Case Report Regular immunohistochemical localization of endothelin-1 and endothelin-B receptor in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human adrenocortical cells

Hiroyuki Hiraki,1 Nobuo Hoshi,1 Hiroshi Hasegawa,1 Toshitaka Tanigawa,2 Iwao Emura,3 Tsutomu Seito,4 Toshifumi Yamaki,1 Takeaki Fukuda,1 Kazuo Watanabe1 and Toshimitsu Suzuki1

“Department of Pathology, Fukushima Medical College, Fukushima, 2Department of Urology, 3Department of Surgical Pathology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata and ^Immunobiological Laboratories, Gunma, Japan

The localization of endothelin (ET)-1/big ET-1, ET-3/big ET-3, ET-A and ET-B receptor was immunohistochemically exam- ined in human adrenal glands composed of 36 normal cases, nine hyperplasia, 70 adenomas and seven carcinomas of cortical cells. In normal adrenals, ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-B receptor were regularly detected in the cortical cells, espe- cially in the zona fasciculata for ET-1 and zona glomerulosa for ET-B receptor but not in the medulla, while ET-A receptor localized occasionally in endothelial cells or rarely in cortical cells and ET-3/big ET-3 was very limited In the cortical cells. In hyperplasia, adenoma and carcinoma, ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-B receptor showed frequent localization, although focal distribution of the ET-B receptor was rather predominant in these groups. ET-A receptor and ET-3/big ET-3 were very Infrequently expressed. Functioning versus non-functioning and hypertensive versus normotensive cases revealed no significant differences in the frequency of positive cells for ET-1/big ET-1, ET-3/big ET-3, ET-A receptor or ET-B receptor. Alternatively, the frequency of Immunoreactivity to ET-1/big ET-1 or ET-B receptor significantly decreased in hyperplasia, adenoma and carcinoma, when compared with that of normal adrenal cortex.

The present study, therefore, indicates that ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-B receptor are a prevalent ligand-receptor system in normal and hyperplastic/neoplastic adrenocortical cells, even with a malignant profile, and may contribute in maintaining adrenocortical cell function or cell viability but not cell growth or systemic hypertension.

Key words: adrenocortical cells, endothelin, endothelin recep- tor, immunohistochemistry

Correspondence: Toshimitsu Suzuki, MD, Department of Pathology, Fukushima Medical College, 1-Hikariga-oka, Fukushima 960-12, Japan.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent vasoconstrictive peptide com- posed of 21 amino acid residues originally isolated from the supernatant of cultured porcine endothelian cells.1 From subsequent cDNA cloning from human genomic library there have emerged three distinct isopeptides termed ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3.2 In addition, cDNA cloning from murine intestine has revealed a similar peptide named vasoactive intestinal contractor.3 These peptides are a member of the ET family. Similar to other hormones, ET is synthesized in a pre-proform, which is metabolized to an intermediate ‘big endothelin’. It is then cleaved by a specific ET-converting enzyme that yields the mature peptide. Although ET was initially described as endothelial cells from a large vessel, it is now appreciated that ET is widely distributed among different organs and localized in various cell types including human brain, lung, kidney, jejunum and placenta for ET-1 mRNA,4,5 renal medulla and jejunum for ET-2 mRNA, and adrenal, jejunum, brain and renal medulla for ET-3 mRNA.5 Recently human adrenal cortex and adrenocortical adenoma have been reported to contain ET-1, ET-3 and ET receptor subtypes concomitantly at each mRNA level.6 Moreover, ET-1 distribution in normal and neoplastic adrenal glands has been described.7

Two kinds of receptors for ET have been found, namely ET-A receptor and ET-B receptor.8-11 ET-A receptor is ET-1 specific and expressed in lung, aorta, atrium, liver, muscle, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, kidney, adrenal, duodenum, colon and placenta at the mRNA or cDNA level, while ET-B receptor lacks isopeptide specificity and is found in liver, lung, placenta, kidney, heart and brain.8-10,12 Cellular locali- zation of ET-receptors in these organs or tissues, however, has not been elucidated, although stromal cells, but not epithelial cells of the breast, express ET-1 receptor in vitro. 13

The present immunohistochemical study reports frequent localization of immunoreactive ET-1 and ET-B receptors in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human adrenocortical cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissues

Eighty-six formalin-fixed (10%), paraffin-embedded speci- mens of adrenals with hyperplasia, adenoma or carcinoma, which were obtained by surgery, were employed in the present study. Sex- and age-matched normal 36 adrenals of autopsy cases from normotensive and hypertensive groups were also sampled. The duration of hypertension as esti- mated by clinical records was 23.2 ± 11.5 years in males and 24.8 ± 11.0 years in females. Every specimen was his- tologically re-evaluated for diagnosis. The adrenocortical carcinoma was diagnosed according to the criteria by Weiss14 and reconfirmed thereafter.15 The number of cases exam- ined, endocrinological state and presence or absence of hypertension are summarized in Table 1.

Antibodies

Antibodies against ET-1, ET-3, big ET-1, ET-A receptor and ET-B receptor were raised in rabbits by subcutaneous injec- tions of each immunogen coupled with thyroglobulin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Each antigen was used as follows: ET-1 itself, sept-mer peptide of ET-1 (positions 15-21 amino acid residues, ET-1 (15-21)), 17-mer peptide of big ET-1 (posi- tions 22-38 amino acid residues, big ET-1 (22-38)), ET-3 itself, 11-mer peptide of human ET-A receptor (positions 59-69 amino acid residues, ET-AR (59-69))ª and 14-mer peptide of human ET-B receptor (positions 420-433 amino acid residues, ET-BR (420-433)).11 Every antiserum obtained was fractionated to IgG through protein A AvideGel (Bio Probe International, Tustin, CA, USA) and specifically purified

Table 1 List of cases examined
Category (n)Symptom of endocrinology (n)Hypertension (n)
Normal adrenal (36)* Adrenocortical hyperplasia (9) AdrenocorticalNone (36) Primary aldosteronism (9)Present (19)
Present (9)
adenoma (70)Primary aldosteronism (38) Cushing's syndrome (26)+ None (6)Present (38) Present (18) Present (1)
Adrenocortical carcinoma (7)Cushing's syndrome (2) Primary aldosteronism (1) None (4)
Present (2) Present (1) Present (1)

*Autopsy case. +A case with mixed tumor of pheochromocyte and adrenocortical cell is included.

through antigen-bound activated thiol AvideGel F affinity column chromatography (Bio Probe International). Specificity of the antibody except for the receptor antibodies was deter- mined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method in which each antigen, including vasoactive intestinal contractor (Peptide Inst., Osaka, Japan), 50 ng/well in amount, was immunobilized in the ELISA plate. After incubation with the antibody, anti-rabbit IgG coupled with horseradish per- oxidase was applied to the plate, after which peroxidase reaction product was visualized by o-phenylenediamine sub- strate (Sigma). Optical density of the product was detected by Bio Rad immunoreader (Nippon Bio Rad Lab., Tokyo, Japan).

Mouse antityrosine hydroxylase monoclonal antibody (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA) and antichro- mogranin A polycional antibody (Dakopatts, Copenhagen, Denmark) were also used.

Western blotting

Normal adrenal glands obtained at autopsy were subjected to western blotting. Briefly, the adrenal cortices were sonicated for 5 min in lysis buffer (0.1% sucrose monolaurate, 0.01% ethylene diamine tetra-aceticacid, 2 mmol/L phenylmethyl- sulfonyl fluoride and 0.25% sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After sonication, the samples were centrifuged at 15000xg for 30 min and the resultant supernatant was admixed with sample buffer (1 mol/L Tris-hydrochloric acid pH7.8, 18.75 mL; 2-mercaptoethanol, 15mL; glycerol, 30mL; sodium dodecyl sulfate, 6.9 g; 0.1% bromophenol blue, 3 mL; distilled water, to 100 ml) at 2:1 ratio. Protein concentration was determined for the sodium dodecyl extract. Various amounts of protein were loaded on SDS-PAGE and then blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. After the testing 20 µg protein was finally applied to each lane. The membrane blots were incubated with either anti-ET-AR (59-69) or anti-ET-BR (420-433) antibody followed by anti-rabbit goat IgG conju- gated with horseradish peroxidase. The peroxidase reaction product was visualized by Konika Immunostain HRP1S-50B (Konika, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry

The working dilution of the primary antibody was 2 µg lgG/ mL for ET-1, and 5µg IgG/mL for ET-3, ET-A receptor and ET-B receptor. Antibodies against ET-1 (15-21) and big ET-1 (22-38) were not used in this study because of broad cross- reactivity with other antigens of ET-1 (15-21) antibody (Table

Table 2 Cross-reactivities of anti-endothelin antibodies produced
AntigenAnti-ET-1 (%)Anti-ET-1 (15-21) (%)Anti-ET-1 (22-38) (%)Anti-ET-3 (%)
ET-110010000
ET-2110000
ET-30.410000
Big ET-1100<0.11000.8
Big ET-20.2<0.1<0.10.8
Big ET-30.4<0.1<0.1100
VIC0.210000.1

VIC, vasoactive intestinal contractor; ET, endothelin.

2) or poor avidity of big ET-1 (22-38) antibody to the tissue antigen of the section.

Antityrosine hydroxylase monoclonal antibody and anti- chromogranin A antibody were applied to the sections at working dilutions of 1:100 or 1:500, respectively. Endog- enous peroxidase activity in each tissue section was blocked by methanol-hydrogen peroxide for 20 min and then the slides were treated with 5% skimmed milk (Yukijirushi, Sap- poro, Japan) in PBS for 30 min to avoid non-specific adsorp- tion of IgG. After incubation with each antibody overnight at 4℃, the slides were incubated with biotin-labeled anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse Ig (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan), and then streptavidin-conjugated peroxidase (Nichirei) for 20 min at room temperature. Peroxidase reaction product was visual- ized by Graham-Karnovsky solution16 containing 65 mg NaN,/dL to block endogenous peroxidase activity again. Cellular nuclei were counterstained with 1% methyl green. Specificity of the immunostaining was confirmed as follows: omission of the primary antibody and application of the pre- absorbed antibody with 5 µg homologous antigen in the first step of immunostaining in cases where the antibodies were produced by us. In addition, vascular endothelial cells for ET-1, lung for ET-A receptor, placenta for ET-3 and vascular smooth muscle cells for ET-B receptor were evaluated in the immunohistochemistry as positive control tissues.

Evaluation of the immunohistochemistry

The frequency of the positively immunolabeled cells was scored as follows: diffuse, more than 50%; focal, less than 50% to more than 10%; and scattered, less than 10%.

Statistics

The frequency of positivity expressed by percent was statis- tically analyzed using Chi-squared test or Fisher’s t-test.

RESULTS

Specificity of antibodies produced

Cross-reactivity of each antibody determined by the ELISA method is summarized in Table 2. Anti-ET-1 antibody reacts with ET-1 and big ET-1 but not with ET-2, ET-3, big ET-2, big ET-3 and vasoactive intestinal contractor (VIC), while anti- ET-1 (15-21) antibody binds with ET-1, ET-2, ET-3 and VIC but not with any big ET. Anti-ET-3 antibody shows reactivity with ET-3 and big ET-3 but not with the other ET-related antigens examined. Anti-big ET-1 (22-38) antibody recog- nizes big ET-1 alone. As described previously, anti-ET-1 and anti-ET-3 antibodies were used in this study and the immuno- histochemical results were evaluated as ET-1/big ET-1 or ET- 3/big ET-3 positivity from the cross-reactivity of these two antibodies.

On western blotting, anti-ET-AR (59-69) and anti-ET-BR (420-433) antibodies revealed single broad bands at 49 kDa and 51 kDa in molecular weight, respectively (Fig. 1). These molecular weights are compatible with those of the respec- tive receptors.8.11

Immunohistochemistry

ET-1/big ET-1-positive cells were diffusely detected in normal adrenal cortex mainly in the zona fasciculata to zona reticu- laris (Fig. 2a), while pre-absorbed antibody with the homolo- gous ET-1 antigen failed to label the cortical cells (Fig. 2b).

Figure 1 Western blotting reveals a single but rather broad band detected by anti-ET-A receptor antibody at about 49 kDa in molecular weight and by anti-ET-B receptor antibody at about 51 kDa in molecular weight, respectively.

STANDARD

ET-AR(2)

STANDARD

ET-BR(2)

97.4-+

66.2+

45.0-+

kD

Figure 2 (a) ET-1/big ET-1-positive cells are found in the zona fasciculata to zona reticularis and (b) the preabsorbed ET-1 antibody with the homologous antigen fails to label the cortical cells. (c) ET-3/big ET-3-labeled cells are distributed in the deep zona fasciculata of normal adrenal gland. (d) ET-B receptor-positive cells are in the zone glomerulosa to zona fasciculata and (e) a negative result is obtained by the preabsorbed ET-B receptor antibody. (f) Higher magnification discloses membranous, cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining with ET-B receptor antibody. (g) A faintly labeled cortical cell (arrowhead) and (h) intensely-stained vascular endothelial cells with anti ET-A receptor antibody. (C) indicates capsule of the normal adrenal gland.

a

b

C

(C)

(c)

C

g

d

e

h

Occasional labeling of endothelial cells with anti-ET-1 anti- body was found in large and/or capillary blood vessels of adrenal glands used (not shown). ET-3/big ET-3-stained cells were rarely and limitedly found in the deep zona fasciculata or zona reticularis (Fig. 2c). Cells with ET-BR (420-433) localized mainly in the zona glomeralosa to upper fasciculata and pre-absorbed ET-BR (420-433) antibody gave a nega- tive result (Fig. 2e). Staining was observed in the cell mem- brane, cytoplasm and/or nucleus of the cortical cells (Fig. 2f). ET-1/big ET-1 or ET-BR (420-433)-labeled cells were rarely distributed in the medulla but these were heterotopic cortical cells as they were negative for tyrosine hydroxylase or chromogranin A (data not shown). In contrast, ET-AR (59-69) was hardly found in the adrenal gland cells (Fig. 2g), although occasional labeling of vascular endothelial cells were en- countered in the deep cortex or in the medulla (Fig. 2h). The frequency and the expression pattern of both ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-BR (420-433) were not different between the normo- tensive and hypertensive group (P<0.5; Table 3).

Adrenocortical cell hyperplasia, adenoma or carcinoma disclosed ET-1/big ET-1 mainly in the diffuse pattern (Fig. 3a,d). In adenoma, clear cells showed dotted, granular posi- tivity, while compact cells revealed dense homogenous prod- ucts in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3b). On the other hand, ET-BR (420-433) was present diffusely in the hyperplasia (Fig. 3e) but mainly focally in the adenoma (Fig. 3f) or carcinoma (Fig. 3g). In adenocortical hyperplasia, the pattern of ET-1/

big ET-1 and ET-BR (420-433) expression seemed to be similar between the diffuse and nodular type. One case with mixed tumor of pheochromocyte and adrenocortical cell revealed ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-B receptor immunoreactivity only in the adrenocortical cell component and lacked immuno- reactivity to ET-3/big ET-3 or ET-A receptor (data not shown). ET-3/big ET-3 and ET-AR (59-69) were infrequently and very limitedly detected in the hyperplasia, adenoma (Fig. 4a,b) or carcinoma (Fig. 4c). One case of carcinoma, however, was focally populated with a number of ET-3/big ET-3-laden tumor cells (Fig. 4d). These data are summarized in Table 4. The frequency of diffuse expression of ET-1/big ET-1 seemed to be higher in functioning adrenocortices, especially in primary aldosteronism, than that in non-functioning ones, but the difference is not significant (P<0.13; Table 5). The fre- quency of diffuse expression of ET-BR (420-433) was almost equal between the functioning and non-functioning groups, and although the frequency was very low, ET-3/big ET-3 and ET-AR (59-69) expression between these two groups also were almost equal (Table 5).

In the hyperplasia, adenoma and carcinoma group, the diffuse distribution pattern of ET-1/big ET-1 was slightly but not significantly higher in the hypertensive cases than in the normotensive cases (P<0.06), the same as for ET-3/big ET-3 and ET-B receptor irrespective of the very low frequency of positivity, while for ET-B receptor the two cases were almost similar (Table 6).

Table 3 Result of immunochemistry of normal adrenal glands
Blood pressureET-1/big ET-1ET-3/big ET-3ET-A receptorET-B receptor
Diffuse (%)Focal (%)Diffuse (%)Scattered (%)Diffuse (%)Scattered (%)Diffuse (%)Focal (%)
Normotensive n=1717/17 (100)0/17 (0)0/17 (0)1/17 (6)0/17 (0)2/17 (12)17/17 (100)0/17 (0)
Hypertensive n=1919/19 (100)0/19 (0)1/19 (5)1/19 (5)0/19 (0)3/19 (16)16/19 (84)3/19 (16)

ET, endothelin.

Table 4 Result of immunohistochemistry of proliferative adrenocortical disease
CategoryET-1/big ET-1ET-3/big ET-3ET-A receptorET-B receptor
Diffuse(%)Focal (%)Diffuse (%)Scattered(%)Diffuse(%)Scattered(%)Diffuse (%)Focal(%)
Adrenocortical hyperplasia n=9*7/9(78)2/9(22)0/92/9(11)0/93/9(33)5/9 (56)4/9(44)
Adenoma
Primary aldosteronism n=3831/38(82)7/35(18)0/38 (0)6/38(16)0/38(0)5/38(13)6/38 (16)31/38(82)
Cushing's syndrome n=27+16/27(59)11/27(41)0/27 (0)10/27(37)0/27(0)4/27(15)16/27 (59)11/27(41)
None n=63/6(50)3/6(50)0/6 (0)0/6(0)0/6(0)0/6(1/6 (17)5/6(83)
Carcinoman=74/7(57)3/7(43)0/7 (0)3/7(43)0/7(0)1/7(14)3/7 (43)4/7(57)
Cushing's syndrome n=22/2(100)0/2(0)0/2 (0)1/2(50)0/2(0)0/2(0)0/2 (0)2/2(100)
Primary aldosteronism n= 10/1(0)1/1(100)0/1 (0)0/1(0)0/1(0)0/1(0)0/1 (0)1/1(100)
None n=42/4(50)2/4(50)0/42/4(50)0/4(0)1/4(25)3/4 (75)1/4(25)

*Aldosterone-producing.

+27 adenomas examined.

ET, endothelin.

Figure 3 (a) Intense and diffuse staining in adenoma cells of compact-cell type and (b) dotted, granular products in adenoma cells of clear- cell type with ET-1/big ET-1 antibody. (c) Histology of the carcinoma stained by hematoxylin and eosin (arrowheads: mitotic figures) and (d) ET-1/big ET-1 positive cells in adrenocortical carcinoma. (e) ET-B receptor-positivity is found diffusely in hyperplasia, (f) focally in adenoma or (g) carcinoma.

C

a

b

6

e

f

g

The frequency of diffuse expression of ET-1/big ET-1 in normal adrenals was significantly higher than that of prolifera- tive adrenocortices (P<0.002), including normal versus hyperplasia (P<0.0038), normal versus adenoma (P<0.0001) and normal versus adrenocortical carcinoma (P<0.0028; Table 7). This was the same or more conspicuous in the

frequency of ET-B receptor between normal and proliferative adrenal cortices (P<0.001), showing normal versus hyper- plasia (P<0.015), normal versus adenoma (P<0.0001) and normal versus carcinoma (P<0.0047; Table 7). The frequency of ET-3/big ET-3 in proliferative adrenal cortices was higher than that of normal adrenal cortices (P<0.0085) indicating

Table 5 Expression of ET and ET receptor in functioning versus non-functioning cortices
CategoryET-1/big ET-1ET-3/big ET-3 Scattered (%)ET-B receptorET-A receptor Scattered (%)
Diffuse (%)Focal (%)Diffuse (%)Focal (%)
Functioning n=7756/77 (73)21/77 (27)19/77 (25)27/77 (35)49/77 (64)12/77 (16)
Primary aldosteronism n=4838/48 (79)10/48 (21)8/48 (17)11/48 (23)36/48 (75)8/48 (17)
Cushing's syndrome n=29*18/29 (62)11/29 (38)1/29 (38)16/29 (55)13/29 (45)4/29 (14)
Non-functioning n=105/10 (50)5/10 (50)2/10 (20)4/10 (40)6/10 (60)1/10 (10)

*29 adrenal glands examined. ET, endothelin.

Table 6 Expression of ET and ET receptor in hypertensive versus normotensive cases
HypertensionET-1/big ET-1ET-3/big ET-3 Scattered (%)ET-B receptorET-A receptor Scattered
Diffuse (%)Focal (%)Diffuse (%)Focal (%)
Present n=69*53/69 (77)16/69 (23)14/69 (20)25/69 (36)43/69 (62)9/60 (15)
Absent n=126/12 (50)6/12 (50)1/12 (8)4/12 (33)8/12 (67)0/12 (0)

*One borderline case is omitted. ET, endothelin.

Table 7 Frequency of ET and ET receptor expression in normal versus hyperplastic/neoplastic adrenal cortex
CategoryET-1/big ET-1 Diffuse (%)ET-3/big ET-3 Scattered (%)ET-A receptor Scattered (%)ET-B receptor Diffuse (%)
Normal n=3636/36 (100)2/36 (6)5/36 (14)33/36 (92)
Proliferative n= 8761/87 (70)21/87 (24)13/87 (15)34/87 (39)
Hyperplasia n=97/9 (78)2/9 (11)3/9 (33)5/9 (56)
Adenoma n=7150/71 (70)16/71 (23)9/71 (13)26/71 (37)
Carcinoma n=74/7 (57)3/7 (43)1/7 (14)3/7 (43)

ET, endothelin.

Figure 4 (a) One ET-3/big ET-3-labeled cell and (b) a few ET-A receptor positive cells in adenoma. (c) Clustered ET-A receptor-laden cells and (d) number of ET3/big ET-3-immunostained cells in carcinoma.

C

a

a

b

normal versus adenoma (P<0.016) and normal versus car- cinoma (P<0.015), but that of ET-AR (59-69) remained unchanged in these two categories (Table 7).

DISCUSSION

In the present study the ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-BR were regularly demonstrated in normal and hyperplastic or neo- plastic adrenocortical cells, as expected from the recent report that mentioned concomitant occurrence of mRNA for ET-1, ET-3 and ET receptors in human adrenal cortex.6 Moreover, both of them show similar distribution patterns, while ET-3/big ET-3 and ET-AR are exceptionally and limit- edly detected in the adrenocortical cells in the aforemen- tioned categories. In addition, adrenomedullary cells are negative for ET-1/big ET-1, ET-3/big ET-3 and ET receptors, although Amico et al. have described that some of the normal cells in adrenal medulla were labeled by anti-ET-1 antibody.17 They did not confirm these cells to be adrenomedullary cells by catecholamine or chromogranin-positivity. From results of the present study, these cells seem to be heterotopic cortical cells in the normal adrenal medulla. For ET-1, Li et al. also have described that normal adrenomedullary cells were negative, and they have reported that immunohistochemical products of ET-1 in adrenocortical cells, normal and neoplas- tic, showed the form of vacuoles, grains or cell membranes.7 Our results were almost similar, but diffusely stained cells in the cytoplasm were also frequently found, especially in the compact cells of adenoma. The reason for this minor differ- ence is not clear but the difference of the antibody used and/ or enhancement procedure (glucose oxidase-DAB-nickel method) of the immunoreactive products employed by them may be a contributing factor. Staining fashion of the ET-B receptor in adrenocortical cells, on the other hand, revealed to be membranous and diffuse in the cytoplasm and/or nuclear in both the normal and proliferative state. Nuclear localization of ET-receptor immunoreactivity may be feasible as ET-1 binds both the cell membrane and nuclear fraction of rat liver cells. 18

ET-1/big ET-1 expression seems to be higher, but not significantly, in the group with endocrinological symptoms than that of the silent group with adenoma or carcinoma, although exogenous ET-1 stimulates cortisol and/or aldoster- one genesis and secretion in the cultured rat or human adrenal cortex in vitro.19-21 The hypertensive group with or without adrenocortical diseases showed no differences in frequency in ET-1 expression compared to the normotensive group of the respective category. From these observations, ET-1 may not contribute to the cause and/or maintenance of high blood pressure but to the regulation and/or mainte- nance of the normal state of adrenocortical cells.

In addition to long-lasting vasoconstriction, ET has potent hyperplastic-hypertrophic effects that have been implicated in normal growth and development,22-30 and proliferation associated with neoplasia.31-34 Cell growth by ET-1 has been reported to be mediated through its receptor ET-A.35 In adrenal cortex analysed by Ki-67 labeling, normal zona fas- ciculata and adenoma have been reported to show a similar labeling index, while that of carcinoma is significantly higher.36 ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-BR system in the adrenocortical cells, either normal or hyperplastic/neoplastic, found in the present study may not work as an auto- or paracrine growth stimula- tion system, because normal adrenocortical cells are more intensely and frequently positive than adrenocortical cells in hyperplasia, adenoma and carcinoma. Conversely, carcinoma revealed rather low frequency of labeling with ET-1/ET-B receptor. These observations are basically compatible with the report of Nelson et al.37 They described decreased ET- BR expression in advanced prostatic cancer, while ET-1 and ET-AR expression were retained. In adrenocortical cells, ET- 1 and ET-AR system, however, also seem not to be associ- ated with cell growth, as ET-AR expression was very limitedly detected in normal and hyperplastic/neoplastic adrenocorti- cal cells. ET-3/big ET-3-immunoreactive cells were more frequently detected in diseased adrenocortices than in nor- mal. The contribution of ET-3/big ET-3 to cell growth of the former category seems to be unlikely because the frequency or distribution was very low or very limited.

In conclusion, ET-1/big ET-1 and ET-BR system, of which true biological significance waits for further investigation, is regularly present in normal and neoplastic adrenocortical cells, and these molecules, therefore, are a reliable cell marker of adrenocortical cells, normal or neoplastic, even in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens, in addition to vimentin in adrenocortical tumor cells described by Schröder et al. 38

REFERENCES

1 Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S et al. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature 1988; 332: 411-415.

2 Inoue A, Yanagisawa M, Kimura S et al. The human endothelin family: Three structurally and pharmacologically distinct isopep- tides predicted by three separate genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1989; 86: 2863-2867.

3 Saida K, Mitsui Y, Ishida N. A novel peptide, vasoactive intestinal contractor, of a new (endothelin) peptide family. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 14 613-14 616.

4 Nunez DJR, Brown MJ, Davenport AP, Neylon CB, Schofield JP, Wyse RK. Endothelin-1 mRNA is widely expressed in por- cine and human tissues. J. Clin. Invest. 1990; 85: 1537-1541.

5 Yanagisawa M, Inoue A, Imai T, Matsushita Y, Masaki T. cDNA cloning and differential expression of human endothelin-2 and endothelin-3 (abstract). Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1990; 52 (Suppl. 1): 112.

6 Imai T, Hirata Y, Eguchi S et al. Concomitant expression of receptor subtype and isopeptide of endothelin by human adre- nal gland. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992; 182: 1114-1121.

7 Li Q, Grimelius L, Gröndal S, Höog A, Johansson H. Immuno- histochemical localization of endothelin-1 in non-neoplastic and neoplastic adrenal gland tissue. Virchows Archiv. 1994; 425: 259-264.

8 Hosoda K, Nakao K, Arai H et al. Cloning and expression of human endothelin-1 receptor cDNA. FEBS Lett. 1991; 287: 23-26.

9 Arai H, Hori S, Aramori I, Ohkubo H, Nakanishi S. Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor. Nature 1990; 348: 730-732.

10 Sakurai T, Yanagisawa M, Takuwa Y et al. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature 1990; 348: 732-735.

11 Nakamuta M, Takayanagi R, Sakai Y et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of a cDNA encoding human non-selective type of endothelin receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991; 177: 34-39.

12 Elshourbagy NA, Korman DR, Wu H-L et al. Molecular charac- terization and regulation of the human endothelin receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1993; 268: 3873-3879.

13 Baley PA, Resnik TJ, Eppenberger U, Hahn AWA. Endothelin messenger RNA and receptors are differentially expressed in cultured human breast epithelial and stromal cells. J. Clin. Invest. 1990; 85: 1320-1323.

14 Weiss LM. Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasizing and non-metastasizing adrenocortical tumors. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1984; 8: 163-169.

15 Medeiros LJ, Weiss LM. New developments in the pathologic diagnosis of adrenal cortical neoplasms. A review. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1992; 97: 73-83.

16 Graham RC Jr, Karnovsky MH. The early stage of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in proximal tubules of mouse kidney ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1966; 14: 291-302.

17 Amico JA, Clarke MR, Watson CG et al. Endothelin-1 gene expression in human pheochromocytoma. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1993; 122: 667-672.

18 Hocher B, Rubens C, Hensen J, Gross P, Bauer C. Intracellular distribution of endothelin-1 receptors in rat liver cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992; 184: 498-503.

19 Mazzocchi G, Malendowicz LK, Meneghelli V, Nussdorfer GG. Endothelin-1 stimulates mitotic activity in the zona glomerulosa of the rat adrenal cortex. Cytobios 1992; 69: 91-96.

20 Hinson JP, Vinson GP, Kapas S, Teja R. The role of endothelin in the control of adrenocortical function: stimulation of endo- thelin release by ACTH and the effects of endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 on steroid genesis in rat and human adrenocortical cells. J. Endocrinol. 1991; 128: 275-280.

21 Zeng Z-P, Naruse M, Guan B-J et al. Endothelin stimulates aldosterone secretion in vitro from normal adrenocortical tissue, but not adenoma tissue, in primary aldosteronism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1992; 74: 874-878.

22 Takuwa N, Takuwa Y, Yanagisawa M, Yanashita K, Masaki T. A novel vasoactive peptide endothelin stimulates mitogenesis through inositol lipid turnover in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 7856-7861.

23 Kusuhara M, Yamaguchi K, Ohnishi A et al. Endothelin poten- tiates growth factor-stimulated DNA synthesis in Swiss 3T3 cells. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1989; 80: 302-305.

24 Komuro I, Kurihara H, Sugiyama T, Takaku F, Yazaki Y. Endoth- elin stimulates c-fos and c-myc expression and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1988; 238: 249-252.

25 Hirata Y, Takagi Y, Fukuda Y, Marumo F. Endothelin is a potent mitogen for rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 1989; 78: 225-228.

26 Hasson PM, Thappa V, Landman MJ, Fanburg BL. Endothelin- 1: Mitogenic activity on pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells and release from hypoxic endothelial cells. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1992; 199: 165-170.

27 Bobik A, Grooms A, Millar JA, Mitchell A, Grinpukel S. Growth factor activity of endothelin on vascular smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 1990; 258: C408-415.

28 Simonson MS, Wann S, Mene P et al. Endothelin stimulates phospholipase C, Na/H exchange c-fos expression and mito- genesis in rat mesengial cells. J. Clin. Invest. 1989; 83: 708-712.

29 Takagi Y, Fukase M, Takata KS, Yoshimi H, Tokunaga O, Fujita T. Autocrine effect of endothelin on DNA synthesis in human vascular endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990; 168: 527-543.

30 Vigne P, Marsault R, Breittmayer JP, Frelin C. Endothelin stimu- lates phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and DNA synthesis in brain capillary endothelial cells. Biochem. J. 1990; 266: 415-420.

31 Shichiri M, Hirata Y, Nakajima T et al. Endothelin-1 is an auto- crine/paracrine growth factor for human cancer cell lines. J. Clin. Invest. 1991; 87: 1867-1871.

32 Giaid A, Hamid QA, Springall DR et al. Detection of endothelin immunoreactivity and mRNA in pulmonary tumours. J. Pathol. 1990; 162: 15-22.

33 Suzuki N, Matsumoto H, Kitada C, Kimura N, Fujino M. Produc- tion of endothelin-1 and big endothelin-1 by tumor cells with epithelial-like morphology. J. Biochem. 1989; 106: 736-741.

34 Kusuhara M, Yamaguchi K, Nagasaki K et al. Production of endothelin in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1990; 50: 3257-3261.

35 Ohstein EH, Arleth A, Bryan H, Eliott JD, Sung CP. The selective endothelin EtA receptor antagonist BQ123 antagonizes endo- thelin-1 mediated mitogenesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharma- col. 1993; 225: 347-350.

36 Sasano H, Imatani A, Shizawa S, Suzuki T, Nagura H. Cell proliferation and apoptosis in normal and pathologic human adrenal. Mod. Pathol. 1995; 8: 11-17.

37 Nelson JB, Chan-Tack K, Hedican SP et al. Endothelin-1 pro- duction and decreased endothelin B receptor expression in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 663-668.

38 Schröder S, Padberg B-C, Achilles E, Holl K, Dralle H, Klöppel G. Immunocytochemistry in adrenocortical tumours: a clinico- pathological study of 72 neoplasms. Virchows Archiv. A. Pathol. Anat. Histopathol. 1992; 420: 65-70.