ELSEVIER
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mce
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
.
Synaptophysin and chromogranin A expression analysis in human tumors
Ria Uhlig ª, David Dum ª, Natalia Gorbokon ª, Anne Menza, Franziska Büscheck ª, Andreas M. Luebke ª, Claudia Hube-Magg ª, Andrea Hinsch ª, Doris Höflmayer ª, Christoph Fraune ª, Katharina Möllera, Christian Bernreuther ª, Patrick Lebok ª, Sören Weidemann ª, Maximilian Lennartza, Frank Jacobsen ª, Till S. Clauditza, Guido Sauter ª, Waldemar Wilczaka, Stefan Steurer ª, Eike Burandta, Rainer Krech b, Till Krech a, b, Andreas H. Marx a,c, Ronald Simona,”, Sarah Minner ª
a Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
b Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany
Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
Check for updates
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Synaptophysin Chromogranin A Immunohistochemistry Tissue microarray TMA
ABSTRACT
The expression of the neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A was analyzed by immuno- histochemistry in 14,584 samples from 103 different tumor types and subtypes in a tissue microarray format. At least one of these markers was found to be positive in 96.7% of tumors from various subtypes of neuroendocrine neoplasms. In non-neuroendocrine tumors, synaptophysin and/or chromogranin A staining was seen in 6.3% (n = 584), specifically in 41 of 88 non-neuroendocrine tumor entities. Basal cell carcinomas of the skin (50% positive for chromogranin A alone) and adrenocortical carcinomas (91.7% positive for synaptophysin alone) stood out due to a frequent expression of only one specific marker. A subdivision of non-neuroendocrine neo- plasms revealed “neuroendocrine differentiation” most commonly in adenocarcinomas from the female genital tract (18.9%), from pancreatico-/hepato-/biliary tract (15.8%) and the prostate (14.9%) while it was rare in urothelial (1.0%) and squamous cell carcinomas (0.6%). A comparison with clinico-pathological parameters of tumor aggressiveness did not suggest a clinical significance of neuroendocrine marker expression in 204 endo- metrium cancers, 249 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 233 gastric adenocarcinomas and 1,182 colorectal adeno- carcinomas. Within a cohort of 1,073 breast cancers of no special type, synaptophysin positivity was seen in 4.9% of cases and it was significantly linked to advanced tumor stage (p = 0.0427), high tumor grade (p = 0.0319) and loss of estrogen receptor expression (p = 0.0061) but unrelated to patient outcome. In conclusion, “neuroen- docrine differentiation” can be observed in many different tumor types with non-neuroendocrine morphology. Evidence for a statistically significant association (p < 0.0001) between such a “neuroendocrine differentiation” and tumor aggressiveness could not be found.
1. Introduction
Neuroendocrine differentiation can be defined by its (patho-)physi- ological property of secretion of bioactive substances into the blood- stream or pathologically by distinct architectural and cytological patterns as well as immunohistochemically through detection of char- acteristic neurosecretory proteins such as synaptophysin and chromog- ranin A. Synaptophysin is the most abundant synaptic vesicle protein by mass (Takamori et al., 2006) and regulates endocytosis of synaptic vesicles (Kwon and Chapman, 2011). Synaptophysin is a commonly used
immunohistochemical marker with a high sensitivity and a limited specifity, especially in high grade tumors (Rindi et al., 2022). The sec- ond most commonly used immunohistochemical marker for determining neuroendocrine differentiation is chromogranin A, which is highly specific but less sensitive than synaptphysin (Rindi et al., 2022). Chro- mogranin A is a granin protein located in secretory vesicles of neurons and endocrine cells (Bartolomucci et al., 2011) and is involved in various biological pathways controlling protein (peptides, hormones, neurotransmitters and growth factors) secretion upon stimulation (Arvan et al., 1991). In recent years, INSM1 (Insulinoma-associated
* Corresponding author. Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. E-mail address: R.Simon@uke.de (R. Simon).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2022.111726
Received 25 March 2022; Received in revised form 8 July 2022; Accepted 12 July 2022
Available online 31 July 2022
0303-7207/ 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
protein) has increasingly been proposed as an (additional) nuclear marker for neuroendocrine differentiation in diagnostic pathology. Further studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic utility as a stand-alone or additional marker for identifying neuroendocrine differentiation.
Expression of neuroendocrine features is an important hallmark of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tumors with neuroendocrine features can be basically divided into four main groups: 1.) well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, 2.) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine car- cinomas, 3.) tumors with neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components (MiNEN, mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasm), and 4) tumors with non-neuroendocrine morphology but expression of neuroendocrine markers (reviewed in (Volante et al., 2006)). Terminology and classification systems vary by organ and have changed over time, although this basic division applies to most organs reviewed in (Rindi et al., 2022).
The clinical significance of tumors of the groups 1-3 has been extensively studied and is considerably well known for neoplasms derived from most organs. The clinical significance of neuroendocrine marker expression in non-neuroendocrine appearing tumors is much less clear, however. Proposals for using “neuroendocrine marker expression” for classifying tumors of non-neuroendocrine origin exist for some tumor entities such as breast and prostate cancer but are lacking for many other tumor entities (2019,2016). Moreover, the incidence of carcinomas showing only neuroendocrine differentiation by immunohistochemistry (group 4 mentioned above) is probably underestimated, since immu- nostaining for neuroendocrine markers is not performed routinely.
To better understand the prevalence of “neuroendocrine differenti- ation” in cancer, a comprehensive study analyzing a large number of cancer tissues under highly standardized conditions is needed. There- fore, synaptophysin and chromogranin A were analyzed in more than 14,584 tumor tissue samples from 103 different tumor types and sub- types as well as 76 non-neoplastic tissue categories by immunohisto- chemistry (IHC) in a tissue microarray format in this study.
2. Material and methods
Tissue Microarrays (TMAs). The normal tissue TMA was composed of 8 samples from 8 different donors for each of 76 different normal tissue types (608 samples on one slide). The cancer TMAs contained a total of 14,584 primary tumors from 103 tumor types and subtypes. Detailed histopathological data on grade, pT and pN status (plus estro- gen receptor, progesteron receptor and HER2 status for breast cancer) were available from 259 endometrial, 2,139 breast, 598 pancreatic, 327 gastric and 2,351 colorectal cancers. Clinical follow-up data were only available from 877 breast cancer patients. In these patients the median follow-up time was 43 (range 1-88) months. The composition of both normal and tumor TMAs is described in detail in the results section. All samples were retrieved from the archives of the Institutes of Pathology, University Hospital of Hamburg, Germany, the Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Germany, and Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Germany. Tissues were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and then embedded in paraffin. The TMA manufacturing pro- cess was described earlier in detail (Dancau et al., 2016; Kononen et al., 1998). In brief, one tissue spot (diameter: 0.6 mm) was transmitted from a tumor containing donor block in an empty recipient paraffin block. The use of archived remnants of diagnostic tissues for manufacturing of TMAs and their analysis for research purposes as well as patient data analysis has been approved by local laws (HmbKHG, §12) and by the local ethics committee (Ethics commission Hamburg, WF-049/09). All work has been carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. The TMAs have been used in previous studies (Uhlig et al., 2022; Reis- wich et al., 2021; Menz et al., 2021), although the total number of analyzed tumors varies between different studies since a combination of different TMA blocks is sometimes used.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC). Freshly prepared TMA sections
were manually immunostained on one day in one experiment. Slides were deparaffinized with xylol, rehydrated through a graded alcohol series, and exposed to heat-induced antigen retrieval for 5 min in an autoclave at 121 ℃ in pH 7.8 buffer. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with Dako Peroxidase Blocking Solution™ (Agilent, CA, USA; #52023) for 10 min. Primary antibody specific against synapto- physin (rabbit recombinant, MSVA-462R, MS Validated Antibodies GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was applied at 37 ℃ for 60 min at a dilution of 1:2000 and against chromogranin A (rabbit recombinant, MSVA- 380R, MS Validated Antibodies) was applied at 37 ℃ for 60 min at a dilution of 1:3600. Bound antibody was then visualized using the EnVision Kit™M (Agilent, CA, USA; K5007) according to the manufac- turer’s directions. The sections were counterstained with haemalaun (Dako, EnVison Flex, SM806, Agilent, CA, USA). For tumor tissues, the percentage of marker positive tumor cells was estimated and the stain- ing intensity was semi-quantitatively recorded (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). For statistical analyses, the staining results were categorized into four groups as follows (see also Suppl. Table 1): Negative: no staining at all, weak staining: staining intensity of 1+ in ≤70% or staining intensity of 2+ in ≤30% of tumor cells, moderate staining: staining intensity of 1+ in >70%, staining intensity of 2+ in >30% but in ≤70% or staining intensity of 3+ in ≤30% of tumor cells, strong staining: staining in- tensity of 2+ in >70% or staining intensity of 3+ in >30% of tumor cells.
Statistics. Statistical calculations were performed with JMP 14 software (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). Contingency tables and the chi2- test were performed to search for associations between synaptophysin/ chromogranin A and tumor phenotype. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier. The Log-Rank test was applied to detect significant differences between groups. A p-value of ≤0.05 was defined as significant.
3. Results
Technical issues. The stainings were interpretable in 13,405 (91.9%) tumors for synaptophysin and in 11,218 (76.9%) for chro- mogranin A. A total of 9,697 (66.5%) samples had an interpretable result for both markers and were available for a combined analysis. Non- interpretable samples were due to lack of unequivocal tumor cells or loss of the tissue spot during technical procedures. A sufficient number of samples of each normal tissue type was always evaluable.
Synaptophysin immunostaining in normal tissues. Synaptophy- sin was strongly expressed in cerebrum, cerebellum, islets of Langerhans of the pancreas, the medulla of the adrenal gland, the anterior and posterior lobe of the pituitary gland, and in scattered cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system, which are especially seen in gastrointestinal (including Brunner glands), respiratory, and endocervical epithelium as well as in the skin. A weak to strong immunostaining occurred in axons and ganglion cells of the peripheral nerves in the gastrointestinal wall. Some synaptophysin staining was also seen in adrenal cortical cells, goblet cells and Paneth cells. Images of synaptophysin staining in normal tissues are shown in Fig. 1A-D.
Chromogranin A immunostaining in normal tissues. A strong Chromogranin A immunostaining was seen in the medulla but not in the cortex of the adrenal gland, the parathyroid, the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland, pancreatic islets of Langerhans, as well as in scattered cells of the diffuse neuroendocrine system. A weak to moderate immu- nostaining was also seen in axons and ganglion cells of the peripheral nerves in the gastrointestinal wall. Images of chromogranin A staining in normal tissues are shown in Fig. 1E-H.
Synaptophysin and Chromogranin A immunostaining in neoplastic tissues. A positive immunostaining was seen for synapto- physin in 6.5% of 13,405 cases (180 weak, 150 moderate, 544 strong; Supplementary Table 2) and for chromogranin A in 7.6% of 11,218 cases (220 weak, 273 moderate, 359 strong; Supplementary Table 3). 500 tumors (5.2%) were positive for both markers, 247 (2.5%) for syn- aptophysin only and 282 (2.9%) for chromogranin A only. Both markers
| Tumor entity | on TMA (n) | CGA / SYN immunostaining | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyzable (n) | CGA negative / SYN negative (n;%) | CGA negative / SYN positive (n;%) | CGA positive / SYN negative (n;%) | CGA positive / SYN positive (n;%) | |||
| Tumors of the skin | Pilomatrixoma | 35 | 33 | 33;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 |
| Basal cell carcinoma | 88 | 64 | 32;50 | 0;0 | 32;50 | 0;0 | |
| Benign nevus | 29 | 26 | 26;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin | 90 | 78 | 76;97.4 | 1;1.3 | 1;1.3 | 0;0 | |
| Malignant melanoma | 46 | 43 | 43;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Merkel cell carcinoma | 46 | 44 | 0;0 | 8;18.2 | 1;2.3 | 35;79.5 | |
| Tumors of the head and neck | Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx | 110 | 48 | 48;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 |
| Oral squamous cell carcinoma (floor of the mouth) | 130 | 49 | 49;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Basal cell adenoma of the salivary gland | 15 | 15 | 15;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tumors of the lung, pleura and thymus | Adenocarcinoma of the lung | 196 | 166 | 161;97 | 4;2.4 | 0;0 | 1;0.6 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung | 80 | 64 | 64;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Small cell carcinoma of the lung | 15 | 14 | 2;14.3 | 3;21.4 | 2;14.3 | 7;50 | |
| Mesothelioma, epitheloid | 39 | 19 | 19;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Mesothelioma, other types | 76 | 53 | 52;98.1 | 1;1.9 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Thymoma | 29 | 28 | 28;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tumors of the female genital tract | Squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina | 78 | 35 | 35;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva | 130 | 39 | 39;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix | 129 | 43 | 43;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma | 236 | 192 | 122;63.5 | 3;1.6 | 63;32.8 | 4;2.1 | |
| Endometrial serous carcinoma | 82 | 67 | 61;91 | 1;1.5 | 5;7.5 | 0;0 | |
| Carcinosarcoma of the uterus | 48 | 35 | 30;85.7 | 2;5.7 | 2;5.7 | 1;2.9 | |
| Endometrial carcinoma, high grade, G3 | 13 | 11 | 8;72.7 | 2;18.2 | 1;9.1 | 0;0 | |
| Endometrial clear cell carcinoma | 8 | 5 | 5;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary | 110 | 77 | 65;84.4 | 3;3.9 | 9;11.7 | 0;0 | |
| Serous carcinoma of the ovary | 559 | 302 | 281;93 | 1;0.3 | 16;5.3 | 4;1.3 | |
| Mucinous carcinoma of the ovary | 96 | 65 | 39;60 | 2;3.1 | 11;16.9 | 13;20 | |
| Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary | 50 | 32 | 29;90.6 | 0;0 | 3;9.4 | 0;0 | |
| Carcinosarcoma of the ovary | 47 | 34 | 32;94.1 | 1;2.9 | 1;2.9 | 0;0 | |
| Brenner tumor | 9 | 9 | 9;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tumor entity | on TMA (n) | CGA / SYN immunostaining | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyzable (n) | CGA negative / SYN | CGA negative / SYN positive (n;%) | CGA positive / SYN negative (n;%) | CGA positive / SYN | |||
| negative (n;%) | positive (n;%) | ||||||
| Tumors of the breast | Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type | 1345 | 1114 | 1048;94.1 | 35;3.1 | 13;1.2 | 18;1.6 |
| Lobular carcinoma of the breast | 293 | 190 | 181;95.3 | 8;4.2 | 1;0.5 | 0;0 | |
| Medullary carcinoma of the breast | 26 | 25 | 25;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tubular carcinoma of the breast | 27 | 22 | 21;95.5 | 1;4.5 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Mucinous carcinoma of the breast | 58 | 39 | 29;74.4 | 2;5.1 | 2;5.1 | 6;15.4 | |
| Phyllodes tumor of the breast | 50 | 47 | 47;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tumors of the digestive system | Adenomatous polyp, low-grade dysplasia | 50 | 47 | 47;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 |
| Adenomatous polyp, high-grade dysplasia | 50 | 47 | 45;95.7 | 0;0 | 2;4.3 | 0;0 | |
| Adenocarcinoma of the colon | 1882 | 1247 | 1164;93.3 | 33;2.6 | 34;2.7 | 16;1.3 | |
| Gastric adenocarcinoma, diffuse type | 176 | 100 | 89;89 | 1;1 | 6;6 | 4;4 | |
| Gastric adenocarcinoma, intestinal type | 174 | 138 | 131;94.9 | 4;2.9 | 1;0.7 | 2;1.4 | |
| Gastric adenocarcinoma, mixed type | 62 | 38 | 37;97.4 | 0;0 | 1;2.6 | 0;0 | |
| Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus | 83 | 70 | 62;88.6 | 4;5.7 | 3;4.3 | 1;1.4 | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus | 75 | 66 | 66;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal | 89 | 45 | 45;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Cholangiocarcinoma | 113 | 74 | 74;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | 50 | 49 | 49;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas | 612 | 305 | 250;82 | 20;6.6 | 24;7.9 | 11;3.6 | |
| Pancreatic/Ampullary adenocarcinoma | 89 | 50 | 39;78 | 3;6 | 4;8 | 4;8 | |
| Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas | 16 | 15 | 9;60 | 0;0 | 3;20 | 3;20 | |
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) | 50 | 49 | 48;98 | 0;0 | 1;2 | 0;0 | |
| Tumors of the urinary system | Non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G2 low grade | 177 | 94 | 94;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 |
| Non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G2 high grade | 141 | 66 | 66;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G3 | 187 | 68 | 67;98.5 | 1;1.5 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Urothelial carcinoma, pT2-4 G3 | 1206 | 495 | 490;99 | 3;0.6 | 2;0.4 | 0;0 | |
| Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder | 20 | 19 | 1;5.3 | 9;47.4 | 0;0 | 9;47.4 | |
| Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma | 25 | 8 | 8;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Clear cell renal cell carcinoma | 857 | 629 | 629;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Papillary renal cell carcinoma | 255 | 166 | 166;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Clear cell (tubulo) papillary renal cell carcinoma | 21 | 17 | 17;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma | 131 | 71 | 71;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Oncocytoma | 177 | 97 | 97;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tumor entity | CGA / SYN immunostaining | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| on TMA (n) | analyzable (n) | CGA negative / SYN negative (n;%) | CGA negative / SYN positive (n;%) | CGA positive / SYN negative (n;%) | CGA positive / SYN positive (n;%) | ||
| Tumors of the male genital organs | Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 3+3 | 83 | 82 | 81;98.8 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 1;1.2 |
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 4+4 | 80 | 74 | 64;86.5 | 3;4.1 | 3;4.1 | 4;5.4 | |
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 5+5 | 85 | 84 | 70;83.3 | 3;3.6 | 9;10.7 | 2;2.4 | |
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (recurrence) | 258 | 168 | 136;81 | 10;6 | 13;7.7 | 9;5.4 | |
| Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate | 19 | 17 | 2;11.8 | 5;29.4 | 1;5.9 | 9;52.9 | |
| Seminoma | 621 | 526 | 526;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Tumors of endocrine organs and neuroendocrine neoplasms | 94;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |||
| Adenoma of the thyroid gland | 114 | 94 | |||||
| Papillary thyroid carcinoma | 392 | 202 | 200;99 | 1;0.5 | 1;0.5 | 0;0 | |
| Follicular thyroid carcinoma | 154 | 103 | 103;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Medullary thyroid carcinoma | 111 | 96 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 4;4.2 | 92;95.8 | |
| Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma | 45 | 37 | 37;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Adrenal cortical adenoma | 50 | 50 | 22;44 | 24;48 | 3;6 | 1;2 | |
| Adrenal cortical carcinoma | 26 | 24 | 2;8.3 | 22;91.7 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Paraganglioma | 41 | 39 | 0;0 | 4;10.3 | 0;0 | 35;89.7 | |
| Phaeochromocytoma | 50 | 48 | 0;0 | 1;2.1 | 0;0 | 47;97.9 | |
| Appendix, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) | 21 | 10 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 10;100 | |
| Colorectal, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) | 12 | 9 | 0;0 | 1;11.1 | 0;0 | 8;88.9 | |
| lleum, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) | 49 | 38 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 38;100 | |
| Lung, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) | 19 | 15 | 0;0 | 1;6.7 | 0;0 | 14;93.3 | |
| Pancreas, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) | 95 | 85 | 1;1.2 | 3;3.5 | 4;4.7 | 77;90.6 | |
| Colorectal, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) | 12 | 5 | 0;0 | 2;40 | 0;0 | 3;60 | |
| Gallbladder, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) | 4 | 1 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 1;100 | |
| Pancreas, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) | 13 | 13 | 0;0 | 2;15.4 | 0;0 | 11;84.6 | |
| Tumors of soft tissue and bone | Tenosynovial giant cell tumor | 45 | 44 | 44;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 |
| Granular cell tumor | 53 | 11 | 11;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Leiomyoma | 50 | 46 | 46;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Leiomyosarcoma | 87 | 82 | 78;95.1 | 4;4.9 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Liposarcoma | 132 | 61 | 61;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) | 13 | 10 | 10;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Myofibrosarcoma | 26 | 23 | 23;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Angiosarcoma | 73 | 20 | 20;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Angiomyolipoma | 91 | 57 | 57;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans | 21 | 12 | 12;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Ganglioneuroma | 14 | 9 | 7;77.8 | 1;11.1 | 0;0 | 1;11.1 | |
| Neurofibroma | 117 | 96 | 96;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Sarcoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) | 74 | 58 | 58;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Ewing sarcoma | 23 | 7 | 6;85.7 | 1;14.3 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma | 6 | 5 | 5;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Schwannoma | 121 | 109 | 107;98.2 | 2;1.8 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Synovial sarcoma | 12 | 8 | 7;87.5 | 1;12.5 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Osteosarcoma | 43 | 11 | 11;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
| Chondrosarcoma | 38 | 4 | 4;100 | 0;0 | 0;0 | 0;0 | |
Synaptophysin
A
B
C
D
Chromogranin A E
F
G
H
were most commonly positive in neuroendocrine neoplasms including neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix, colorectum, ileum, pancreas and lung, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the colorectum, the gall bladder and the pancreas, medullary thyroid carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, paraganglioma, phaeochromocytoma, and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder, the prostate and the lung. Among these tu- mors, 96.7% (of n = 460) showed a positive staining for synaptophysin and/or chromogranin.
Among the remaining non-neuroendocrine tumor entities, only 6.3% of n = 9,237 of tumors with available data on both markers were syn- aptophysin and/or chromogranin A positive including 3.4% of cases with synaptophysin staining (120 weak, 97 moderate, 97 strong), 4.1% with chromogranin A staining (141 weak, 189 moderate, 46 strong), and 1.1% (106 tumors) with staining for both markers. A total of 41 of 88 analyzed non-neuroendocrine tumor entities contained at least one case with either chromogranin A or synaptophysin immunostaining and 22 tumor entities included at least one case with strong positivity of at least one of these markers (Table 1).
Representative images of synaptophysin and chromogranin A posi- tive tumors are shown in Figs. 2-4. It is of note, that many tumors classified as weakly positive only contained few scattered cancer cells with strong expression of synaptophysin and/or chromogranin. This was particularly common in adenocarcinoma of the prostate, mucinous carcinoma of the ovary, invasive breast carcinoma of no special type, ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, gastric adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the colon (Fig. 3). A graphical representation of the
prevalence of synaptophysin and/or chromogranin A positivity among tumors is given in Fig. 5. In this ranking order, various types of neuro- endocrine neoplasms are followed by adrenocortical tumors and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. These latter tumor entities stood out because basal cell carcinomas expressed only chromogranin A and adrenocor- tical tumors only synaptophysin. A subdivision of non-neuroendocrine neoplasms revealed “neuroendocrine differentiation” most commonly in adenocarcinomas from the female genital tract (18.9% of 750), pan- creatico-/hepato-/biliary origin (15.8% of 497), the prostate (14.9% of 408), the upper gastrointestinal tract (8.9% of 349), lower gastrointes- tinal tract (6.8% of 1249), breast (6.3% of 1393), and the lung (3.0% of 166) while it was particularly rare in urothelial carcinomas (1.0% of 724) and squamous cell carcinomas (0.6% of 469).
Synaptophysin and chromogranin A expression, tumor pheno- type and prognosis. Synaptophysin and chromogranin A immuno- staining was not associated with parameters of disease aggressiveness in 204 evaluable endometrium cancers, 249 evaluable pancreatic adeno- carcinomas, 233 evaluable gastric adenocarcinomas and 1,182 evalu- able colorectal adenocarcinomas. In a cohort of 1,073 breast carcinomas of no special type, synaptophysin positivity was seen in 4.9% of cases and was linked to advanced tumor stage (p = 0.0427), high tumor grade (p = 0.0319) and loss of estrogen receptor expression (p = 0.0061). In the same cohort of breast cancers chromogranin A was only linked to loss of estrogen receptor expression (p = 0.0213). There was no asso- ciation with overall survival.
Synaptophysin
A
B
C
O
D
A
Chromogranin A
E
F
G
H
Synaptophysin
A
B
C
Chromogranin A
D
E
F
D
HE
Synaptophysin
Chromogranin A
4. Discussion
The successful immunhistochemical analysis of 9,697 tumors iden- tified neuroendocrine marker expression in 10.6% (n = 1,029) of tu- mors. While about half of tumors with synaptophysin or/and chromogranin A positivity belonged to neuroendocrine tumor entities, neuroendocrine markers were also seen in 6.3% (n = 584) of 9,237 tu- mors from non-neuroendocrine entities. Basal cell carcinomas and adrenocortical tumors were the most frequently positive non- neuroendocrine tumors in our study. These tumors are unique because unlike all other neoplasms with neuroendocrine features, basal cell carcinomas expressed only chromogranin A (in 50.0% of our 64 analyzable cases) and adrenocortical carcinomas expressed only syn- aptophysin (in 91.7% of our 24 analyzable cases). These observations fit with previous data and may argue for a specific function of the respec- tive proteins in these tumors rather than reflecting “neuroendocrine differentiation”. Previous studies showed chromogranin A positivity in basal cell carcinoma between 27 and 72% (Houcine et al., 2017; Terada, 2013) and synaptophysin positivity in 67%-85% of adrenal cortical neoplasms (Weissferdt et al., 2014; Sangoi and McKenney, 2010; Kom- minoth et al., 1995; Miettinen, 1992). Synaptophysin or chromogranin A expression can lead to diagnostic difficulties in these tumors. For example, chromogranin A positive basal cell carcinoma may be confused
with Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin or metastatic small cell carci- noma, especially on small biopsies (Pollock et al., 2019). Because of its high positivity rate in adrenocortical cells, synaptophysin staining should not be used in the differential diagnosis with phaeochromocy- toma (2017).
Features of neuroendocrine differentiation were identified in tumors from 41 of 88 different non-neuroendocrine entities analyzed in this study. These findings are consistent with the existing literature as low fractions of cases with “neuroendocrine differentiation” have been described in many different tumor entities. Tumors particularly well known for occasional expression of neuroendocrine markers include for example prostate cancer (reviewed in (Puca et al., 2019)), breast cancer (reviewed in (Tsang and Tse, 2021)), colon cancer (reviewed in (Kleist and Poetsch, 2015)), ovarian carcinoma (Taube et al., 2015; Sasaki et al., 1989) and endometrial carcinomas (Moritz et al., 2019), as well as non-epithelial tumors, such as Ewing sarcoma (Machado et al., 2021). That chromogranin A and synaptophysin positivity was largely unre- lated to histopathological features of cancer aggressiveness in endome- trium cancers, pancreatic adenocarcinomas, gastric adenocarcinomas and colorectal adenocarcinomas in this study further argues against a clinical importance of neuroendocrine differentiation as long as a tumor retains its typical morphology.
In prostate cancer, neuroendocrine differentiation is being viewed as
CGA+SYN positive
SYN only
CGA only
| Fraction of | cancers (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 80.0 100.0 | ||
| Colorectal, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (n=9) | ||||||
| lleum, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (n=38) | ||||||
| Lung, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (n=15) | ||||||
| Colorectal, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n=5) | ||||||
| Gallbladder, neuro endocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n=1) | ||||||
| Paraganglioma (n=39) | ||||||
| Medullary thyroid carcinoma (n=96) | ||||||
| Pancreas, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n=13) | ||||||
| Phaeochromo cytoma (n=48) | ||||||
| Merkel cell carcinoma (n=44) | ||||||
| Pancreas, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (n=85) | ||||||
| Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder (n=19) | ||||||
| Adrenal cortical carcinoma (n=24) | ||||||
| Appendix, neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (n=11) | ||||||
| Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate (n=17) | ||||||
| Small cell carcinoma of the lung (n=14) | ||||||
| Adrenal cortical adenoma (n=50) | ||||||
| Basal cell carcinoma (n=64) | ||||||
| Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas (n=15) | ||||||
| Mucinous carcinoma of the ovary (n=65) | ||||||
| Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (n=192) | ||||||
| Endometrial carcinoma, high grade, G3 (n=11) | ||||||
| Mucinous carcinoma of the breast (n=39) | ||||||
| Ganglioneuroma (n=9) | ||||||
| Pancreatic/Ampullary adenocarcinoma (n=50) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (recurrence) (n=168) | ||||||
| Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (n=305) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 5+5 (n=84) | ||||||
| Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary (n=77) | ||||||
| Carcinosarcoma of the uterus (n=35) | ||||||
| Ewing sarcoma (n=7) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 4+4 (n=74) | ||||||
| Synovial sarcoma (n=8) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (n=70) | ||||||
| Gastric adenocarcinoma, diffuse type (n=100) | ||||||
| Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (n=32) | ||||||
| Endometrial serous carcinoma (n=67) | ||||||
| Serous carcinoma of the ovary (n=302) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the colon (n=1247) | ||||||
| Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (n=1114) | ||||||
| Carcinosarcoma of the ovary (n=34) | ||||||
| Gastric adenocarcinoma, intestinal type (n=138) | ||||||
| Leiomyosarcoma (n=82) | ||||||
| Lobular carcinoma of the breast (n=190) | ||||||
| Tubular carcinoma of the breast (n=22) | ||||||
| Adenomatous polyp, high-grade dysplasia (n=47) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the lung (n=166) | ||||||
| Gastric adenocarcinoma, mixed type (n=38) | ||||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (n=78) | ||||||
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (n=49) | ||||||
| Mesothelioma, other types (n=53) | ||||||
| Schwannoma (n=109) | ||||||
| Non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G3 (n=68) | ||||||
| Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 3+3 (n=82) | ||||||
| Urothelial carcinoma, p T2-4 G3 (n=495) | ||||||
| Papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=202) | ||||||
Fig. 5. Bar chart of the frequency distribution of synaptophysin and chromogranin A staining in tumors. (Blue bar: only synaptophysin (SYN) staining. Orange bar: only chromogranin A (CGA) staining. Striped bar: synaptophysin and chromogranin staining.).
a marker of disease progression, especially in response to androgen deprivation (Hirano et al., 2004; Berruti et al., 2007; Mucci et al., 2000). Consistent with this notion, a higher percentage of neuroendocrine differentiation was found among recurring adenocarcinoma of the prostate (19.0% of n = 168) and cancers with Gleason 5 + 5 (16.7% of n = 84) compared to hormone-naïve cancers Gleason 3 + 3 and Gleason 4 + 4 tumors (7.1% of n = 156). However, that only 19.0% of cancers recurring under anti-androgen therapy expressed neuroendocrine markers demonstrates that this feature is not a very sensitive marker for prostate cancer progression. Given that 7.1% of our untreated 3 + 3 and
4 + 4 cancers also expressed neuroendocrine markers shows that this feature also lacks specificity for progressive disease. Since most studies evaluating clinical endpoints failed to find any clinical significance of neuroendocrine marker expression in hormone-naïve tumors, the immunohistochemical analysis of neuroendocrine markers has not been recommended for general use of acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate in the current WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs (2022).
That single cell neuroendocrine marker positivity was particularly frequent in colorectal cancer fits with data from previous studies
describing neuroendocrine marker-positive cells in up to 40% of colo- rectal adenocarcinomas (Ogimi et al., 2019; Foley et al., 1998). The same phenomenon has been described in several other cancers including esophageal (Hamilton et al., 2000) and gastric adenocarcinoma (Wang et al., 2013). It is of note that 11% of our 100 gastric adenocarcinomas of the diffuse type showed a moderate to strong staining for synaptophysin and/or chromogranin A. This is consistent with a development of at least a fraction of these tumors from enterochromaffine-like (ECL) cells, another neuroendocrine cell-type (Prinz et al., 2003). An ECL origin of these tumors has been suggested by several authors based on RNA and protein expression data (Waldum and Mjones, 2020; Bartley et al., 2011; Fujiyoshi and Eimoto, 2008; Bakkelund et al., 2006). From a diagnostic point of view, it is important, that single neuroendocrine marker-positive cells within the tumor glands are not confused with a mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN), which is mostly made of a poorly differentiated NEC component, together with an adenocarcinoma component.
Given the size of our study, it is not surprising that positive cases were also found in various tumor entities for which neuroendocrine differentiation has so far not been described. For example, uterine leiomyosarcoma showed unexpected neuroendocrine differentiation in 4.9% of 82 analyzed cases. Although studies on synaptophysin or chromogranin expression in leiomyosarcomas do not exist, our data are consistent with frequent expression of the much less specific “neuroen- docrine marker” CD56 in most uterine smooth muscle tumors (Karpa- thiou et al., 2021). The fact that in many tumor entities neuroendocrine marker positivity was only found in a single case may suggest, that synaptophysin or chromogranin A positivity can - in principle - occur in every tumor entity. Whether or not such findings reflect a biologically relevant neuroendocrine differentiation of tumor cells is uncertain.
It is the pivotal strength of our study that TMAs were used since this approach enables the analysis of an unprecedented number of tumors and offers maximum standardization of analysis. Standardization not only affects the staining procedures, but also the quantity of tissue analyzed per patient and the time between cutting and staining a section (section storage time). Studies have shown that section storage time of only two weeks results in substantial reduction of immunostaining (Mirlacher et al., 2004; Jacobs et al., 1996). It would be very difficult to carry out a study with over 10,000 tumors with identical staining pro- cedures for each case. It is of note, that the age of the tissue blocks is much less or probably not related to immunostaining success as long as identical fixation procedures/reagents have been used (Litlekalsoy et al., 2007). Analysis of tissue microarrays sometimes raises concerns about representativity, especially with regard to tumor heterogeneity due to the small size of tissue cores (0.6 mm). However, tumor heterogeneity is always an issue independent of the size of the analyzed tissue, consid- ering that a typical whole section (3 x 2 cm; thickness 3 um) has a tiny volume of 0.0018 cm3 in comparison to a large tumor mass measuring 5 cm in diameter (65 cm3). While it is true that the fraction of positive cases increases with the quantity of tissue analyzed (Camp et al., 2000; Hoos et al., 2001; Rubin et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2003) it does not automatically mean additional positive cases are biologically signifi- cant. This is underlined by a study from Torhorst et al. (Torhorst et al., 2001) analyzing a large number of tumors with clinical follow-up on TMA and large sections. In this study twice as many p53-positive cases were found on large sections compared to TMAs but interestingly sig- nificant associations with clinical outcome were only detected for the results obtained on the TMAs. The authors concluded that on large sections more artificial or biological irrelevant findings were found.
Moreover, the amount of tissue analyzed on a TMA is comparable to the amount of tissue analyzed on a small biopsy, the typical material for a primary diagnosis of a neuroendocrine neoplasms. The major limita- tion of our TMA study is, that although we analyzed over 14,000 tumors, some tumor entities are underrepresented.
In summary, our extensive analysis of over 103 different tumor types and subtypes show that “neuroendocrine differentiation” is more
common than expected. Evidence for a strong link between “neuroen- docrine differentiation” and tumor aggressiveness could not be found.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
David Dum: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Natalia Gorbokon: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis. Anne Menz: Data curation, Formal analysis. Franziska Büscheck: Data curation, Resources, Validation. Andreas M. Luebke: Data curation, Resources, Validation. Andrea Hinsch: Data curation, Resources, Validation. Doris Höflmayer: Data curation, Re- sources, Validation. Christoph Fraune: Data curation, Resources, Validation. Katharina Möller: Data curation, Validation. Christian Bernreuther: Data curation, Visualization. Patrick Lebok: Conceptu- alization. Sören Weidemann: Conceptualization. Frank Jacobsen: Conceptualization. Till S. Clauditz: Conceptualization. Stefan Steurer: Conceptualization. Rainer Krech: Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interest
The synaptophysin antibody (clone MSVA-462R) and the chromog- ranin A antibody (clone MSVA-380R) were provided from MS Validated Antibodies GmbH (owned by a family member of GS).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Melanie Witt, Inge Brandt, Maren Eisenberg, and Sünje Seekamp for excellent technical assistance.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. org/10.1016/j.mce.2022.111726.
References
Arvan, P., Kuliawat, R., Prabakaran, D., Zavacki, A.M., Elahi, D., Wang, S., Pilkey, D., 1991. Protein discharge from immature secretory granules displays both regulated and constitutive characteristics. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14171-14174.
Bakkelund, K., Fossmark, R., Nordrum, I., Waldum, H., 2006. Signet ring cells in gastric carcinomas are derived from neuroendocrine cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 54, 615-621.
Bartley, A.N., Rashid, A., Fournier, K.F., Abraham, S.C., 2011. Neuroendocrine and mucinous differentiation in signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: evidence for a common cell of origin in composite tumors. Hum. Pathol. 42, 1420-1429.
Bartolomucci, A., Possenti, R., Mahata, S.K., Fischer-Colbrie, R., Loh, Y.P., Salton, S.R., 2011. The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications. Endocr. Rev. 32, 755-797.
Berruti, A., Mosca, A., Porpiglia, F., Bollito, E., Tucci, M., Vana, F., Cracco, C., Torta, M., Russo, L., Cappia, S., Saini, A., Angeli, A., Papotti, M., Scarpa, R.M., Dogliotti, L., 2007. Chromogranin A expression in patients with hormone naive prostate cancer predicts the development of hormone refractory disease. J. Urol. 178, 838-843 quiz 1129.
Camp, R.L., Charette, L.A., Rimm, D.L., 2000. Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma. Lab. Invest. 80, 1943-1949.
Dancau, A.M., Simon, R., Mirlacher, M., Sauter, G., 2016. Tissue microarrays. Methods Mol. Biol. 1381, 53-65.
Foley, E.F., Gaffey, M.J., Frierson Jr., H.F., 1998. The frequency and clinical significance of neuroendocrine cells within stage III adenocarcinomas of the colon. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 122, 912-914.
Fujiyoshi, Y., Eimoto, T., 2008. Chromogranin A expression correlates with tumour cell type and prognosis in signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Histopathology 52, 305-313.
Hamilton, K., Chiappori, A., Olson, S., Sawyers, J., Johnson, D., Washington, K., 2000. Prevalence and prognostic significance of neuroendocrine cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 13, 475-481.
Hirano, D., Okada, Y., Minei, S., Takimoto, Y., Nemoto, N., 2004. Neuroendocrine differentiation in hormone refractory prostate cancer following androgen deprivation therapy. Eur. Urol. 45, 586-592. ; discussion 592.
Hoos, A., Urist, M.J., Stojadinovic, A., Mastorides, S., Dudas, M.E., Leung, D.H., Kuo, D., Brennan, M.F., Lewis, J.J., Cordon-Cardo, C., 2001. Validation of tissue microarrays for immunohistochemical profiling of cancer specimens using the example of human fibroblastic tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 1245-1251.
Houcine, Y., Chelly, I., Zehani, A., Belhaj Kacem, L., Azzouz, H., Rekik, W., C, H., Haouet, S., Kchir, N., 2017. Neuroendocrine differentiation in basal cell carcinoma. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 38, 487-493.
Jacobs, T.W., Prioleau, J.E., Stillman, I.E., Schnitt, S.J., 1996. Loss of tumor marker- immunostaining intensity on stored paraffin slides of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88, 1054-1059.
Karpathiou, G., Chauleur, C., Papoudou-Bai, A., Dagher, S., Peoc’h, M., 2021. CD56 is expressed in uterine smooth muscle tumors. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 40, 315-323. Kleist, B., Poetsch, M., 2015. Neuroendocrine differentiation: the mysterious fellow of colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 21, 11740-11747.
Komminoth, P., Roth, J., Schroder, S., Saremaslani, P., Heitz, P.U., 1995. Overlapping expression of immunohistochemical markers and synaptophysin mRNA in pheochromocytomas and adrenocortical carcinomas. Implications for the differential diagnosis of adrenal gland tumors. Lab. Invest. 72, 424-431.
Kononen, J., Bubendorf, L., Kallioniemi, A., Barlund, M., Schraml, P., Leighton, S., Torhorst, J., Mihatsch, M.J., Sauter, G., Kallioniemi, O.P., 1998. Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat. Med. 4, 844-847. Kwon, S.E., Chapman, E.R., 2011. Synaptophysin regulates the kinetics of synaptic vesicle endocytosis in central neurons. Neuron 70, 847-854.
Litlekalsoy, J., Vatne, V., Hostmark, J.G., Laerum, O.D., 2007. Immunohistochemical markers in urinary bladder carcinomas from paraffin-embedded archival tissue after storage for 5-70 years. BJU Int. 99, 1013-1019.
Machado, I., Navarro, S., Lopez-Guerrero, J.A., Verdini, L., Picci, P., Giner, F., Llombart- Bosch, A., 2021. Neuroendocrine differentiation in a large series of genetically- confirmed Ewing’s sarcoma family tumor: does it provide any diagnostic or prognostic information? Pathol. Res. Pract. 219, 153362.
Menz, A., Bauer, R., Kluth, M., Marie von Bargen, C., Gorbokon, N., Viehweger, F., Lennartz, M., Volkl, C., Fraune, C., Uhlig, R., Hube-Magg, C., De Wispelaere, N., Minner, S., Sauter, G., Kind, S., Simon, R., Burandt, E., Clauditz, T., Lebok, P., Jacobsen, F., Steurer, S., Wilczak, W., Krech, T., Marx, A.H., Bernreuther, C., 2021. Diagnostic and prognostic impact of cytokeratin 19 expression analysis in human tumors: a tissue microarray study of 13,172 tumors. Hum. Pathol. 115, 19-36.
Miettinen, M., 1992. Neuroendocrine differentiation in adrenocortical carcinoma. New immunohistochemical findings supported by electron microscopy. Lab. Invest. 66, 169-174.
Mirlacher, M., Kasper, M., Storz, M., Knecht, Y., Durmuller, U., Simon, R., Mihatsch, M. J., Sauter, G., 2004. Influence of slide aging on results of translational research studies using immunohistochemistry. Mod. Pathol. 17, 1414-1420.
Moritz, A.W., Schlumbrecht, M.P., Nadji, M., Pinto, A., 2019. Expression of neuroendocrine markers in non-neuroendocrine endometrial carcinomas. Pathology 51, 369-374.
Mucci, N.R., Akdas, G., Manely, S., Rubin, M.A., 2000. Neuroendocrine expression in metastatic prostate cancer: evaluation of high throughput tissue microarrays to detect heterogeneous protein expression. Hum. Pathol. 31, 406-414.
Ogimi, T., Sadahiro, S., Kamei, Y., Chan, L.F., Miyakita, H., Saito, G., Okada, K., Suzuki, T., Kajiwara, H., 2019. Distribution of neuroendocrine marker-positive cells in colorectal cancer tissue and normal mucosal tissue: consideration of histogenesis of neuroendocrine cancer. Oncology 97, 294-300.
Pollock, S.E., Yousef, M., Pallavi, R., Pollock, J., 2019. Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma mimicking small cell carcinoma. Clin. Case Rep. 7, 1276-1279.
Prinz, C., Zanner, R., Gratzl, M., 2003. Physiology of gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65, 371-382.
Puca, L., Vlachostergios, P.J., Beltran, H., 2019. Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: emerging biology, models, and therapies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 9.
Reiswich, V., Gorbokon, N., Luebke, A.M., Burandt, E., Menz, A., Kluth, M., Hube- Magg, C., Wittmer, C., Weidemann, S., Fraune, C., Moller, K., Lebok, P., Sauter, G., Simon, R., Uhlig, R., Wilczak, W., Jacobsen, F., Minner, S., Krech, R., Bernreuther, C., Marx, A., Steurer, S., Clauditz, T., Krech, T., 2021. Pattern of placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) expression in human tumors: a tissue microarray study on 12,381 tumors. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 7, 577-589.
Rindi, G., Mete, O., Uccella, S., Basturk, O., La Rosa, S., Brosens, L.A.A., Ezzat, S., de Herder, W.W., Klimstra, D.S., Papotti, M., Asa, S.L., 2022. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr. Pathol. 33, 115-154. Rubin, M.A., Dunn, R., Strawderman, M., Pienta, K.J., 2002. Tissue microarray sampling strategy for prostate cancer biomarker analysis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 26, 312-319. Sangoi, A.R., McKenney, J.K., 2010. A tissue microarray-based comparative analysis of novel and traditional immunohistochemical markers in the distinction between adrenal cortical lesions and pheochromocytoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 34, 423-432.
Sasaki, E., Sasano, N., Kimura, N., Andoh, N., Yajima, A., 1989. Demonstration of neuroendocrine cells in ovarian mucinous tumors. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 8, 189-200.
Takamori, S., Holt, M., Stenius, K., Lemke, E.A., Gronborg, M., Riedel, D., Urlaub, H., Schenck, S., Brugger, B., Ringler, P., Muller, S.A., Rammner, B., Grater, F., Hub, J.S., De Groot, B.L., Mieskes, G., Moriyama, Y., Klingauf, J., Grubmuller, H., Heuser, J., Wieland, F., Jahn, R., 2006. Molecular anatomy of a trafficking organelle. Cell 127, 831-846.
Taube, E.T., Denkert, C., Pietzner, K., Dietel, M., Sehouli, J., Darb-Esfahani, S., 2015. Prognostic impact of neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 466, 333-342.
Terada, T., 2013. Expression of NCAM (CD56), chromogranin A, synaptophysin, c-KIT (CD117) and PDGFRA in normal non-neoplastic skin and basal cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 66 consecutive cases. Med. Oncol. 30, 444.
Torhorst, J., Bucher, C., Kononen, J., Haas, P., Zuber, M., Kochli, O.R., Mross, F., Dieterich, H., Moch, H., Mihatsch, M., Kallioniemi, O.P., Sauter, G., 2001. Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints. Am. J. Pathol. 159, 2249-2256.
Tsang, J.Y., Tse, G.M., 2021. Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation: an update based on the latest WHO classification. Mod. Pathol. 34, 1062-1073.
Uhlig, R., Contreras, H., Weidemann, S., Gorbokon, N., Menz, A., Buscheck, F., Luebke, A.M., Kluth, M., Hube-Magg, C., Hinsch, A., Hoflmayer, D., Fraune, C., Moller, K., Bernreuther, C., Lebok, P., Sauter, G., Wilczak, W., Izbicki, J., Perez, D., Schrader, J., Steurer, S., Burandt, E., Krech, R., Dum, D., Krech, T., Marx, A., Simon, R., Minner, S., Jacobsen, F., Clauditz, T.S., 2022. Carboxypeptidase A1 (CPA1) immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) of the pancreas. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 46, 97-104.
Volante, M., Rindi, G., Papotti, M., 2006. The grey zone between pure (neuro)endocrine and non-(neuro)endocrine tumours: a comment on concepts and classification of mixed exocrine-endocrine neoplasms. Virchows Arch. 449, 499-506.
Waldum, H., Mjones, P., 2020. Towards understanding of gastric cancer based upon physiological role of gastrin and ECL cells. Cancers 12.
Wang, L.L., Yao, G.Y., Zhao, Z.S., Wei, X.L., Xu, R.J., 2013. Clonality analysis of neuroendocrine cells in gastric adenocarcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 5340-5346.
Weissferdt, A., Phan, A., Suster, S., Moran, C.A., 2014. Adrenocortical carcinoma: a comprehensive immunohistochemical study of 40 cases. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 22, 24-30.
WHO, 2022. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, fifth ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon.
Zhang, D., Salto-Tellez, M., Putti, T.C., Do, E., Koay, E.S., 2003. Reliability of tissue microarrays in detecting protein expression and gene amplification in breast cancer. Mod. Pathol. 16, 79-84.