CASE REPORT

Eleni Vrettou . Prodromos Hytiroglou . Nikolaos Sikas · Ioannis Soultoyannis · Zachary D. Goodman

Hepatic adenocarcinoma expressing inhibin in a young patient on oral contraceptives

Received: 12 January 2005 / Accepted: 24 February 2005 / Published online: 7 April 2005 C Springer-Verlag 2005

Abstract A case of primary hepatic carcinoma is reported, which occurred in a 24-year-old woman with a 10-year history of oral contraceptive use, and demonstrated unique morphologic and immunohistochemical features. The tumor was located in the left hepatic lobe, measured 14 cm at its widest, and showed histologic heterogeneity. The neoplastic cells were mostly arranged in trabecular and pseudoglan- dular growth patterns simulating hepatocellular carcinoma; however, in focal areas, small cystic, organoid and tubular patterns predominated. Immunohistochemical stains showed a phenotype consistent with biliary differentiation (positive staining for cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 19, carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 antigen). The tumor cells were neg- ative for markers that would be suggestive of hepatocytic or neuroendocrine differentiation. Interestingly, they were positive for inhibin, a protein that is known to be expressed in sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary, trophoblastic neo- plasms and adrenal cortical tumors, but not in hepatic tu- mors. However, no definite evidence of gonadal stromal, trophoblastic, or adrenocortical differentiation was identi- fied on extensive immunohistochemical work-up. In con- clusion, this unique case may represent a rare variant of cholangiocarcinoma expressing inhibin.

Keywords Adenocarcinoma · Cholangiocarcinoma · Inhibin · Liver

E. Vrettou · P. Hytiroglou ☒ · I. Soultoyannis

Department of Pathology, Aristotle University Medical School, 540 06 Thessaloniki, Greece

e-mail: phitir@med.auth.gr Tel .: +30-2310-999218 Fax: +30-2310-999229

N. Sikas The Interbalkan Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece

Z. D. Goodman The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, USA

Introduction

Adenocarcinomas of the liver (intrahepatic cholangiocar- cinomas) represent approximately 10% of primary carci- nomas of this organ, and are thought to be derived from biliary epithelial cells. These tumors are known to be etiolog- ically associated with parasitosis of the bile ducts, hepato- lithiasis, congenital anomalies of the biliary tree, primary sclerosing cholangitis and Thorotrast exposure [2, 4]. Oral contraceptive steroids have also been suggested as possible etiologic agents of both intrahepatic and extrahepatic chol- angiocarcinoma [1, 8]. In western countries, the majority of cholangiocarcinomas occur in patients without obvious pre- disposing factors.

While the commonest histologic appearance of cholan- giocarcinoma is that of a tubular adenocarcinoma with abun- dant fibrous stroma, other architectural patterns may also be observed, including trabecular and papillary structures [2, 4]. Immunohistochemical stains typically show positivity for “biliary-type” cytokeratins (cytokeratins 7 and 19), carcino- embryonic antigen, epithelial membrane antigen, and an- tigen CA 19-9. Expression of inhibin is not a feature of either cholangiocarcinoma or any other primary hepatic tumor. This protein is commonly detected in gonadal stro- mal tumors and, occasionally, in other ovarian, trophoblas- tic and adrenal cortical neoplasms [3, 5-7, 9].

We report a unique case of hepatic adenocarcinoma with unusual histologic features, which expressed inhibin and occurred in a young patient on oral contraceptives.

Clinical history

A 24-year-old white woman presented with a 15-day his- tory of nausea, vomiting and abdominal discomfort. Phys- ical examination was remarkable for a palpable mass in the mid-upper abdomen. There were no other findings on com- plete systemic examination. The patient’s past medical history was unremarkable. She was a non-smoker and occa- sionally consumed very small amounts of alcohol. She had

been on oral contraceptives (combination of 0.02 mg ethi- nylestradiol and 0.15 mg desogestrel) for 10 years.

Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed a well-circumscribed mass, located in the left hepatic lobe and occupying the inferior and lateral borders. On admin- istration of intravenous contrast, the lesion showed inho- mogeneous enhancement, which was more intense on late images (Fig. 1a). On magnetic resonance images, the mass appeared well defined and measured 16.7×16.2 cm. It was multilobulated and inhomogeneous, with cystic changes, and showed enhancement after intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast material (Fig. 1b). Biochemistry and hematology results were within normal limits. The serum levels of tumor markers, including carcinoembryon- ic antigen, CA 19-9 antigen and CA 125 antigen, were also within normal limits. A full hormonal screen, including follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolac- tin, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, dehydroepiandros- terone-S and thyroid-stimulating hormone, did not reveal any abnormality.

At laparotomy, the tumor mass was found to involve hepatic segments II and III and appeared to have a “push- ing” rather than infiltrating border. A left lobectomy was performed. The lesion was excised intact, together with a 3-cm rim of hepatic parenchyma. The patient had an un-

Fig. 1 Radiographic findings: a Abdominal CT scan showing a well-circumscribed tumor mass in the left hepatic lobe. b MRI of the abdomen: on fat saturation images, the tumor appears multilobulated and inhomogeneous, with focal cystic changes

a

SIND

K

1

1

KY 120

PÅ 90

Auto PÅ:LU

Large

b

IMAGE 132

SER 1 6

R

2

[13dv_il 15

SP

40.3

1

SL

2.5

2 SAT FS

Fov 285”380

TR

4.2

111 =2560

TE

1.9/1

Cor

TA

AC

00:20

1

W

48

21

Table 1 Summary of immunohistochemical stains. HepPar-1 hepa- tocyte specific antigen; CEA carcinoembryonic antigen; hCG human chorionic gonadotropin; NSE neuron-specific enolase; ER estrogen receptor; PR progesterone receptor; PAP prostatic acid phosphatase
AntigenSource of antibodyCloneResult
PancytokeratinDAKOAE1/AE3Moderately positive
Cytokeratin 8/18Becton Dickinsoncam5.2Moderately positive
Cytokeratin 7DAKOOV TL 12/30Strongly positive
Cytokeratin 19DAKORCK108Strongly positive
Cytokeratin 20DAKOKs 20.8Negative
HepPar-1DAKOOCH1E5Negative
pCEADAKOPolyclonalPositive
(cytoplasmic and membranous)
mCEADAKO11-7Negative
EMADAKOE29Negative
CA 19-9DAKO116-NS-19-9Focally positive
CA 125NovocastraNCL-CA125Negative
«-FetoproteinSignetPolyclonalNegative
hCGBiocarePolyclonalNegative
NSEBiocareDT01-BC10Negative
ChromograninSanbioPolyclonalNegative
SynaptophysinVentanaPolyclonalNegative
SomatostatinChemiconPolyclonalNegative
InsulinDAKOPolyclonalNegative
ThyroglobulinDAKODAK-Tg6Negative
CalcitoninBiogenexPolyclonalNegative
VimentinBiocareV-9Negative
InhibinDAKOR1Strongly positive
ER proteinDAKO1D5Negative
PR proteinNovocastra1A6Negative
PAPDAKOPASE/4LJNegative
S-100 proteinDAKOPolyclonalRare positive cells
HMB-45DAKOHMB-45Negative
CD10Novocastra56C6Negative
CD34BiogenexQbend/10Negative
CD56NovocastraERIC-1Moderately positive
CD117 (c-kit)BiotechnologyC-19Negative
Ki-67ImmunotechMIB15-10% of nuclei positive
p53DAKOD0-7Negative

eventful postoperative course and was discharged home 7 days following surgery. Since then (almost 3 years ago), she has been on follow-up with physical examination and tumor markers every 3 months, abdominal ultrasound scan every 6 months, and CT scan of thorax and abdomen every year. She has remained free of recurrence. No further treatment has been given.

Materials and methods

Multiple sections of tumor and non-tumorous hepatic pa- renchyma were routinely processed for paraffin sections. Sections 4 um thick were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and mucicarmine. Additional paraffin sections were used for immunohistochemical stains with a standard streptavi-

din-biotin staining protocol. The primary antibodies uti- lized and their sources are shown in Table 1.

Results

The surgical specimen weighted 940 g and measured 15× 14×7.5 cm. On sectioning, the specimen was almost com-

Fig. 2 Microscopic features. a Low-power view of the tumor shows areas of trabecular (bottom) and microcystic (top) architecture. b The trabeculae vary in thickness and are lined by endothelial cells. c High- power view shows cuboidal or columnar neoplastic cells with moderate nuclear pleomor- phism. d In some areas, the cells form prominent pseudoglandu- lar structures. e Occasional clusters of tumor cells with hepatocytoid features are pres- ent. f, g Focally, the tumor cells are arranged in organoid struc- tures. h In a different area, the tumor cells form tubular struc- tures within a loose fibrous stroma. (Original magnifica- tions: a: ×20; b, d, h: ×100; c: ×200; e, g: ×400; f: ×40)

a

b

C

d

e

g

h

pletely occupied by a well-demarcated tumor, measuring 14 cm at its widest. The cut surface was tan, solid, with focal areas of microcystic change and extensive areas of hemorrhage.

Microscopic examination showed a carcinoma with pre- dominantly trabecular architecture (Fig. 2a, b). The tumor

cells were columnar or cuboidal, with roundish, hyperchro- matic nuclei and moderate amounts of eosinophilic or am- phophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 2c). Mitotic activity was mild. The trabeculae were several cells thick, and were lined by endothelial cells. The neoplastic cells within the trabeculae were often arranged in pseudoglandular structures, some-

Fig. 3 Immunohistochemical findings: the tumor cells are positive for cytokeratin 7 (a) and cytokeratin 19 (b). Stains for carcinoembryonic antigen demonstrate cytoplas- mic and membranous positivity with polyclonal (c), but not with monoclonal antibodies (d). The tumor cells are also positive for CA 19-9 (e), CD56 antigen (f) and inhibin (g). No positivity for HepPar-1 is seen in the neoplasm, as contrasted to nearby hepatocytes (h). (Origi- nal magnifications: a-f: ×100; g, h: ×200)

a

b

C

d

e

f

g

h

times containing amorphous eosinophilic material in the lumina (Fig. 2d). No bile production was seen. Mucicarmin stain was negative for mucin. In the central portion of some trabeculae, the tumor cells contained increased amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm, resembling hepatocytes (Fig. 2e). In some areas, the neoplastic cells lined small cystic spaces (Fig. 2a, f) or formed organoid structures (Fig. 2f, g). In a small area close to the tumor edge, the tumor cells formed tubular structures, surrounded by a loose fibroconnective tissue stroma (Fig. 2h). The tumor contained foci of he- mosiderin deposition, small foci of necrosis and occasional microcalcifications. The surrounding hepatic parenchyma appeared compressed, without evidence of pre-existing dis- ease. The surgical margins of resection were free of tumor.

Due to the unusual histologic features of the tumor, exten- sive immunohistochemical stains were performed (Table 1). The neoplastic cells were positive for “biliary-type” cyto- keratins (cytokeratins 7 and 19), carcinoembryonic antigen (cytoplasmic and membranous staining with polyclonal, but not with monoclonal antibodies), CA 19-9 antigen and CD56 antigen (Fig. 3a-f). They were also positive for in- hibin (Fig. 3g). The tumor cells were negative for a variety of other markers, including those which would be sug- gestive of hepatocytic or endocrine differentiation (Table 1, Fig. 3h).

Discussion

Several aspects of the case reported herein are unusual. In the absence of chronic liver disease, hepatic carcinomas are rare in the 3rd decade of life, and, as a rule, represent he- patocellular carcinomas of the fibrolamellar variant. Our case did not demonstrate histologic features characteristic of fibrolamellar carcinoma. Since our patient did not have any other predisposing factor for tumor development, at- tention must be focused on the 10-year-long history of oral contraceptive use. In an analysis of possible etiologic fac- tors in a series of 42 patients with intrahepatic cholangio- carcinoma, Altaee et al. found that 35% of the women had used oral contraceptives [1]. In a different study, a sta- tistically significant association between the use of contra- ceptives and extrahepatic bile duct cancer was observed among women under 60 years of age [8].

The histologic features of our case are also unusual. In most areas, the predominant growth patterns were trabec- ular and pseudoglandular, simulating hepatocellular carci- noma. In several trabeculae, a neoplastic cell subpopulation with features suggestive of hepatocellular differentiation was also found. However, the tumor cell immunophenotype (cytokeratin 7 and 19 positive, carcinoembryonic antigen positive, CA 19-9 positive, hepatocyte specific antigen neg- ative, «-fetoprotein negative) was consistent with a biliary tumor. Immunopositivity for CD56 antigen may also be supportive of biliary differentiation [10]. Because of the tendency of the neoplastic cells to form organoid structures, a variety of markers of endocrine differentiation were as- sessed, but were found to be negative.

The most unusual feature of this case was the strongly positive immunostaining for inhibin. This glycoprotein is known to be synthesized by granulosa cells, luteinized the- cal cells, and hilus cells of the normal ovary, and to regu- late reproductive functions in conjunction with activin [3]. Inhibin is widely accepted as a marker for sex cord tumors, especially for granulosa cell tumors, and appears to be helpful in the differential diagnosis of such tumors from other neoplasms affecting the ovary [5]. In addition, inhibin is expressed by syncytial trophoblastic cells and in neoplasms of trophoblastic origin, such as hydatidi- form moles, placental site nodule, placental trophoblastic tumors, and choriocarcinoma [3, 7]. This protein is also expressed by the majority of adrenocortical adenomas and carcinomas [6, 9].

Inhibin expression is not considered a feature of primary hepatic neoplasms. On immunohistochemical studies, both hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma have been found to be negative for this protein, with the ex- ception of a single case of high-grade pleomorphic hepa- tocellular carcinoma [11-13]. In the absence of histologic and immunohistochemical evidence of gonadal stromal, trophoblastic or adrenocortical differentiation in the tumor we are reporting, we must conclude that this neoplasm represents a unique case of cholangiocarcinoma expressing inhibin. A possible association with oral contraceptive use may be suggested, but cannot be proven at the present time.

References

1. Altaee MY, Johnson PJ, Farrant JM, Williams R (1991) Etiologic and clinical characteristics of peripheral and hilar cholangiocar- cinoma. Cancer 68:2051-2055

2. Anthony PP (2002) Tumours and tumour-like lesions of the liver and biliary tract: aetiology, epidemiology and pathology. In: MacSween RNM, Burt AD, Portmann BC, Ishak KG, Scheuer PJ, Anthony PP (eds) Pathology of the liver, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 711-775

3. Azumi N, Czernobilsky B (2002) Immunohistochemistry. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1251- 1276

4. Ishak KG, Goodman ZD, Stocker JT (2001) Tumors of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts. In: Atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd series, Fascicle 31. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Wash- ington, pp 185-198

5. Kommoss F, Oliva E, Bhan AK, Young RH, Scully RE (1998) Inhibin expression in ovarian tumors and tumor-like lesions: an immunohistochemical study. Mod Path 11:656-664

6. Pelkey TJ, Frierson HF Jr, Mills SE, Stoler MH (1998) The alpha subunit of inhibin in adrenal cortical neoplasia. Mod Path 11:516-524

7. Shih IM, Kurman RJ (1999) Immunohistochemical localization of inhibin-alpha in the placenta and gestational trophoblastic lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 18:144-150

8. Yen S, Hsieh CC, MacMahon B (1987) Extrahepatic bile duct cancer and smoking, beverage consumption, past medical his- tory, and oral contraceptive use. Cancer 59:2112-2116

9. Zhang PJ, Genega EM, Tomaszewski JE, Pasha TL, LiVolsi VA (2003) The role of calretinin, inhibin, melan-A, BCL-2, and C-kit in differentiating adrenal cortical and medullary tu- mors: an immunohistochemical study. Mod Path 16:591-597

10. Van Den Heuvel MC, Sloof MJH, Visser L, Muller M, De Jong KP, Poppema S, Gouw ASH (2001) Expression of anti-OV6 antibody and anti-N-CAM antibody along the biliary line of normal and diseased human livers. Hepatology 33:1387-1393

11. Renshaw AA, Granter SR (1998) A comparison of A103 and inhibin reactivity in adrenal cortical tumors: distinction from hepatocellular carcinoma and renal tumors. Mod Path 11:1160- 1164

12. Iezzoni JC, Mills SE, Pelkey TJ, Stoler MH (1999) Inhibin is not an immunohistochemical marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. An example of the potential pitfall in diagnostic immunohis- tochemistry caused by endogenous biotin. Am J Clin Pathol 111:229-234

13. Lau SK, Prakash S, Geller SA, Alsabeh A (2002) Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, chol- angiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 33:1175-1181