RESEARCH
Check for updates
CDK1 serves as a therapeutic target of adrenocortical carcinoma via regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition, G2/M phase transition, and PANoptosis
Liwen Ren1,2, Yihui Yang1,2, Wan Li1,2, Xiangjin Zheng1,2, Jinyi Liu1,2, Sha Li1,2, Hong Yang1,2, Yizhi Zhang1,2, Binbin Ge1,2, Sen Zhang1,2, Weiqi Fu1,2, Dexin Dong3, Guanhua Du1,2 and Jinhua Wang1,2*[D
Abstract
Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an extremely rare, aggressive tumor with few effective therapeutic options or drugs. Mitotane (Mtn), which is the only authorized therapeutic drug, came out in 1970 and is still the only first-line treatment for ACC in spite of serious adverse reaction and a high recurrence rate.
Methods: By in silico analysis of the ACC dataset in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA), we determined that high expression levels of cyclin-dependent kinase-1 (CDK1) were significantly related to the adverse clinical outcomes of ACC. In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to evaluate the role of CDK1 in ACC progression through gain and loss of function assays in ACC cells. CDK1 inhibitors were screened to identify potential candidates for the treat- ment of ACC. RNA sequencing, co-immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence assays were used to elucidate the mechanism.
Results: Overexpression of CDK1 in ACC cell lines promoted proliferation and induced the epithelial-to-mesenchy- mal transition (EMT), whereas knockdown of CDK1 expression inhibited growth of ACC cell lines. The CDK1 inhibitor, cucurbitacin E (CurE), had the best inhibitory effect with good time-and dose-dependent activity both in vitro and in vivo. CurE had a greater inhibitory effect on ACC xenografts in nude mice than mitotane, without obvious adverse effects. Most importantly, combined treatment with CurE and mitotane almost totally eliminated ACC tumors. With respect to mechanism, CDK1 facilitated the EMT of ACC cells via Slug and Twist and locked ACC cells into the G2/M checkpoint through interaction with UBE2C and AURKA/B. CDK1 also regulated pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis) of ACC cells through binding with the PANoptosome in a ZBP1-dependent way.
Conclusions: CDK1 could be exploited as an essential therapeutic target of ACC via regulating the EMT, the G2/M checkpoint, and PANoptosis. Thus, CurE may be a potential candidate drug for ACC therapy with good safety and efficacy, which will meet the great need of patients with ACC.
Keywords: Adrenocortical carcinoma, CDK1, Cucurbitacin E, Mitotane, EMT, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, PANoptosis
*Correspondence: wjh@imm.ac.cn
1 The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Background
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an extremely infre- quent neoplasm and makes up only a small percentage of adrenal tumors that are initiated in the adrenal cortex [1].
☒ BMC
@ The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativeco mmons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
The neoplasm has high heterogeneity with poor progno- sis and lacks effective pharmaceutical treatment options [2]. Apart from radical surgery, there are few therapeu- tic options. Mitotane (Mtn), which is the only author- ized drug for treatment, appeared in 1970 after approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and is still the only first-line treatment for ACC [3]. Because of endocrine metabolic disturbances and metastatic tumor growth, ACC patients frequently suffer serious illness [4]. Therefore, exploring novel targets and treatments for patients with ACC is urgently necessary.
By analyzing the survival-related genes of ACC patients, we found that the expression of cyclin-depend- ent kinase-1 (CDK1) was significantly correlated with the survival of ACC patients and is likely to be a thera- peutic target for ACC. CDK1 is involved in the switch- ing between the G2 phase and cell mitosis and enhanced CDK1 activity is often seen in neoplastic cells. Therefore, CDK1 was recognized as a likely target for the treatment of cancer [5]. Several CDK1 inhibitors such as Rigosertib (phase II/III) [6] and Zotiraciclib have entered the phase I clinical research stage for the treatment of pancre- atic cancer and glioma [7]. Inhibition of CDK1 has been related to effective therapeutic outcomes for breast can- cer therapy whether used alone or in combination with other drugs [8]. CDK1 could elevate the development of melanoma via interacting with Sox2 [9]. Despite the rarity of the disease, there is an urgent need to develop safe and effective therapeutic drugs for ACC. CDK1 is a classic therapeutic target and with many advantages for the rapid development of ACC drug candidates. Unfor- tunately, the specific roles and mechanisms of CDK1 in ACC are unclear, and there are still many unknowns about the therapeutic and prognostic significance of CDK1 in ACC that require investigation.
The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the original process in tumor metastasis in which epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics [10]. The EMT is closely related to tumor initiation, metastasis, inva- sion and drug resistance, which plays an important role in cancer progression [11]. The expression of E-cadherin is downregulated and the expression of N-cadherin and metalloproteinases (MMPs) are increased when the EMT process is activated. The EMT is regulated by several transcription factors, such as those of the SNAIL and TWIST family [12]. However, there have been few stud- ies on the relationship between CDK1 and tumor metas- tasis or EMT.
Programmed cell death (PCD), which is mediated via an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway, plays an essential part in antitumor drug discovery [13]. A novel pathway identified for PCD, called PANoptosis, is mediated through a PANoptosome which is a newly
recognized multimeric cytoplasmic protein complex [14]. PANoptosis is a type of synchronized cell death involving co-regulation and crosstalk among pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis [15]. The PANoptosome involves three crucial effectors of PCD PANoptosis operating in paral- lel. Z-DNA binding protein-1 (ZBP1) activates inflam- matory cell death and PANoptosis and is an essential regulator in the formation of the PANoptosome [16]. So far, there has been no relevant research on PANoptosis in ACC or its relationship with CDK1.
In our research, it was discovered that abnormally ele- vated CDK1 expression was strongly related to the unfa- vorable prognosis of ACC patients. In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that overexpression of CDK1 pro- moted proliferation and EMT of ACC cell lines whereas knockdown of CDK1 expression inhibited these functions in ACC cell lines. Through screening of CDK1 inhibi- tors in ACC cell lines, it was identified that cucurbitacin E (CurE) had the best inhibitory effect with good time- and dose-dependent responses both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, CurE was better at inhibiting ACC tumors in a nude mouse xenograft model than mitotane. Whether used alone or in combination with mitotane, CurE showed no obvious adverse effects. CDK1 facilitated the EMT of ACC cells via Slug and Twist and regulated the G2/M phase transition of ACC cells through interactions with UBE2C and AURKA/B. CDK1 regulated the apop- tosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis) of ACC cells through binding with the PANoptosome in a ZBP1- dependent way. Taken together, the above results indicate that CDK1 could serve as an effective antitumor target for ACC with prognostic and therapeutic value, and CurE is a likely candidate with good safety and efficacy for the treatment of ACC.
Methods
Bioinformatics exploration
CDK1 expression in normal and tumor group was inves- tigated in the following databases: http://gepia.cancer- pku.cn/ [17], http://gdac.broadinstitute.org/ [18] and https://www.oncomine.org/ [19]. The mRNA level of CDK1 in ACC was analyzed on the website, http://gepia. cancer-pku.cn/, http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/index.html [20]. The prognostic value of CDK1 for ACC was ana- lyzed on the website, http://sangerbox.com/Index.
Cell culture
The human ACC cell lines, NCI-H295R and SW-13, were acquired from Procell Life Science &Technology (Wuhan, China). SW-13 cells were maintained in Leibo- vitz’s L-15, with 10% FBS and 1% P/S (Procell, CM-0451). NCI-H295R cells were maintained in DMEM/F12, with 6.25 µg/mL insulin, 6.25 ng/ml selenium, 6.25 µg/mL
transferrin, 5.35 µg/mL linoleic acid, 10% FBS and 1% P/S (Procell, CM-0399).
Stable-cell line establishment via lentiviral transfection
For stable CDK1 overexpression in SW-13 cells (SW13 CDK1), the pSLenti-SFH-EGFP-P2A-Puro-CMV-CDK1- 3xFLAG-WPRE and corresponding control lentivirus were obtained from Hanbio (Shanghai, China). After transfection into SW-13 for 72 h, 2 µg/mL puromycin was added to the culture medium screen for stable clon- ing. Two shRNAs were used to construct a stable CDK1- knockdown NCI-H295R cell line (NCI-H295R_shCDK1). The sequences of the two shRNAs were as follows: 5’-GTGGAATCTTTACAGGACTAT-3’ and 5’-GAT TCAGAAATTGATCAACTC-3’. Puromycin (2 µg/mL) was added to cultures to obtain stable CDK1 knockdown in NCI-H295R cells.
CDK1 inhibitors and other chemical reagents
The inhibitors used in the pharmacological activity test for ACC were obtained from MedChemExpress (New Jersey, USA). The CDK1 inhibitors were prazosin hydrochloride, HY-B0193A, 19237-84-4; cucurbitacin
E (CurE), HY-N0417, 18444-66-1; Ro-3306, HY-12529, 872573-93-8; and AZD-5438, HY-10012, 602306-29-6; the GSK3 inhibitors were IX, HY-10580, 667463-62-9 and mitotane, HY-13690, 53-19-0; the pan-caspase inhib- itor was Z-VAD-FMK (VAD), HY-16658B, 161401-82-7; the inhibitor of autophagy was 3-methyladenine (3-MA), HY-19312, 5142-23-4; and the necroptosis inhibitor was necrosulfonamide (Nec), HY-100573, 1360614-48- 7. Additional reagents were cisplatin (Pt), HY-17394, 15663-27-1; paclitaxel (Ptx), HY-B0015, 33069-62-4; and cycloheximide (CHX), HY-12320, 66-81-9.
In vitro cell viability assay
Cell proliferation was measured by CCK8 kit (Dojindo, Kumanmoto, Japan). SW-13_CDK1, NCI-H295R shCDK1 and corresponding control cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 3 × 103 cells per well and cultured for 24, 48 and 72 h. Subsequently, CCK8 reagent was added (10 µL/well) and after incubation for 1 h, the absorb- ance at 450 nm was measured. To calculate the IC50 of CDK1 inhibitors, cells were cultured in 96-well plates with 3 x 103 cells per well at 37 ℃ with different concen- tration of the CDK1 inhibitor, CurE (0-10 umol/L). After
| Characteristic | Level | Low expression of CDK1 | High expression of CDK1 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 39 | 40 | ||
| T stage, n (%) | T1 | 7 (9.1%) | 2 (2.6%) | <0.001 |
| T2 | 28 (36.4%) | 14 (18.2%) | ||
| T3 | 2 (2.6%) | 6 (7.8%) | ||
| T4 | 2 (2.6%) | 16 (20.8%) | ||
| N stage, n (%) | N0 | 36 (46.8%) | 32 (41.6%) | 0.310 |
| N1 | 3 (3.9%) | 6 (7.8%) | ||
| M stage, n (%) | M0 | 36 (46.8%) | 26 (33.8%) | 0.018 |
| M1 | 3 (3.9%) | 12 (15.6%) | ||
| Pathologic stage, n (%) | Stage I | 7 (9.1%) | 2 (2.6%) | <0.001 |
| Stage II | 25 (32.5%) | 12 (15.6%) | ||
| Stage III | 4 (5.2%) | 12 (15.6%) | ||
| Stage IV | 3 (3.9%) | 12 (15.6%) | ||
| Tumor status, n (%) | Tumor free | 29 (37.7%) | 10 (13%) | <0.001 |
| With tumor | 10 (13%) | 28 (36.4%) | ||
| Primary therapy outcome, n (%) | PD | 3 (4.5%) | 15 (22.4%) | <0.001 |
| SD | 2 (3%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| PR | 1 (1.5%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| CR | 32 (47.8%) | 14 (20.9%) | ||
| OS event, n (%) | Alive | 35 (44.3%) | 16 (20.3%) | <0.001 |
| Dead | 4 (5.1%) | 24 (30.4%) | ||
| DSS event, n (%) | Alive | 35 (45.5%) | 16 (20.8%) | <0.001 |
| Dead | 4 (5.2%) | 22 (28.6%) | ||
| PFI event, n (%) | Alive | 27 (34.2%) | 11 (13.9%) | <0.001 |
| Dead | 12 (15.2%) | 29 (36.7%) |
culturing for 24, 48 and 72 h, 10 µL of CCK8 reagent was added per well. After incubation for 1 h, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured.
NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells were pretreated with different inhibitors including Z-VAD-FMK (50 µmol/L), 3-MA (2 mmol/L), and necrosulfonamide (2 pmol/L) for 2 h. Afterwards, the SW-13 cells were incubated with 0.1 umol/L CurE and NCI-H295R cells were treated with 1 umol/L CurE for 24 h. The cell viability was measured according to the above method.
DNA synthesis assay
The EdU kit was used according to the manufacture’s protocol. SW-13_CDK1, NCI-H295R_shCDK1, and the corresponding control cells were cultured for 24 h. Afterwards, the EdU reagent (50 umol/L final) was added to each and incubation at 37 ℃ was continued for another 24 h, after which the cells were fixed, per- meabilized and stained with Hoechst 33342 and Apollo 567.
Cell membrane integrity assessed by LDH release
A lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) detection kit (Dojindo, Japan) was used to measure the level of LDH released from cells. Cells were seeded at 3 x 103/well in 96-well plates and treated with CurE for 24 h and 48 h. After incubation with CurE, the medium was discarded and 100 uL of working reagent was added to each well. Thirty minutes later, the reaction was ended with the stop solution and the activity was measured at 490 nm.
Invasion and migration assay
The roles of CDK1 and CurE in invasion and migration of NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells were evaluated using a 6.5 mm transwell (#3422, Corning Costar, NY, USA). For the migration assay, 2 x 104 cells were put into the upper chamber. For the invasion assay, the transwell chamber was coated with Matrigel dissolved in Biocoat (Corning USA). The Matrigel was diluted with FBS- free medium at a ratio of 1:6 and then 1 x 105 cells were added into the transwell chamber. After incubation, the cells that crossed the insert were fixed, stained with 1% crystal violet, photographed, and counted under a visible light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-U, Tokyo, Japan).
Annexin V-FITC assay with propidium iodide (PI) staining
Cell apoptosis was determined using the annexin V-FITC/ PI detection kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). SW-13 cells were incubated with 0, 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 umol/L CurE and NCI- H295R cells with 0, 0.3, 1 and 3 umol/L CurE for 24 and 48 h. After incubation, the cells were harvested and stained with annexin V-FITC and PI for 10 min. Flow cytometry (FAC- SVERSE, BD Biosciences, New Jersey, USA) was used to determine the percentage of early apoptotic cells, late apop- totic cells, pyroptotic cells and necrotic cells. The data on apoptosis rate was quantified by FlowJo software (v10). ACC cells were pretreated with necrosulfonamide (2 umol/L) for 2 h and then treated with CurE for 24 h. The percentages of early apoptotic, late apoptotic, pyroptotic and necrotic cells were calculated using the above method.
Cell cycle analysis
SW-13 cells were incubated with 0, 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 umol/L CurE and NCI-H295R cells with 0, 0.3, 1 and 3 umol/L CurE for 24 and 48 h. Then cells were harvested by centrifugation and fixed in 75% ethanol for 24 h at 4 ℃. After centrifuga- tion, cells were stained with PI for 20 min, fluorescence was measured, and data was processed with FlowJo software (v10).
RNA sequencing
SW-13_CDK1 cells, SW-13 cells administrated with 0.1 umol/L CurE for 24 h and corresponding control cells were collected in TRIzol reagent. The next generation sequencing of the prepared isolates was conducted on an Illumina sequencer in Novogene Corporation (Beijing, China). The integrity and concentration of total RNA were qualified by the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Illumina sequencer was used to build and qualify, then pool and sequence for the establishment of the New England Biolabs (NEB) libraries. The Gene ontology (GO) analysis were conducted on the DAVID database (v6.8) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/).
Knockdown of Slug, Twist and ZBP1 expression
To knock down Slug, Twist and ZBP1 expression, 100 nmol/L relative target siRNA and relative control siRNA
(See figure on next page.)
Fig. 1 CDK1 facilitated the proliferation of ACC cells both in vitro and in vivo. a Transfection efficiency of CDK1 overexpression in SW-13 cells. b Upregulation of CDK1 promoted growth of SW-13 cells. c Overexpression of CDK1 increased the colony formation of SW-13 cells in soft agar. d Upregulation of CDK1 facilitated the proliferation of SW-13 cells in 3D Matrigel. e Upregulation of CDK1 facilitated the proliferation of SW-13 cells in vivo. f Transfection efficiency of knockdown of CDK1 expression in NCI-H295R cells. g Downregulation of CDK1 suppressed growth of NCI-H295R cells. h Knockdown of CDK1 expression suppressed soft agar colony formation of NCI-H295R cells. i Downregulation of CDK1 suppressed growth of NCI-H295R cells in 3D Matrigel. j Downregulation of CDK1 suppressed growth of NCI-H295R cells in vivo. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data was presented as mean ± SD. *** P < 0.001 vs. control group
a
b
SW-13
SW-13
500
NC
CDK1
Relative growth ratio (% )
NC
400
CDK1
CDK1
- 34
300
200
ß-actin
- 45
100
0
24
48
72
96
C
SW-13
Time (h)
SW-13
NC
CDK1
Number of colony
500-
400
e
300
200
100
600
SW-13_NC
0
NC
CDK1
Tumor volume (mm3)
500
SW-13_CDK1
400
d
300
200
SW-13
Relative size of spheres
SW-13
100
NC
CDK1
5-
0
4.
9
-100
3.
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
1
2.
Time (Day)
1.
0
NC
CDK1
f
g
NCI-H295R
NCI-H295R
Relative growth ratio (% )
300
shNC
shNC
sh1
sh2
shCDK1-1
shCDK1-2
CDK1
- 34
200
ß-actin
- 45
100
0
24
48
72
96
Time (h)
h
NCI-H295R
shNC
shCDK1-1
shCDK1-2
NCI-H295R
Number of colony
500-
400
j
300
200
800
NCI-H295R_shNC
100-
700
Tumor volume (mm3)
NCI-H295R_shCDK1
0
600-
shNC
shCDK1-1
shCDK1-2
500
400
300
i
NCI-H295R
200
100
shNC
shCDK1-1
shCDK1-2
Relative size of spheres
NCI-H295R
0
1.5-
-100
¢
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
1.0
T
Time (Day)
0.5
0.0
shNC
shCDK1-1
shCDK1-2
Fig. 1 (See legend on previous page.)
(Genechem, Suzhou, China) were transfected into NCI- H295R and SW-13 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent and cultured for 48 h at 37 ℃. After transfection, SW-13 cells were incubated with 0.1 umol/L CurE and NCI-H295R cells were incubated with 1 µmol/L CurE for 24 h.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)
SW-13_CDK1 and SW-13_NC cells were planted in 100 mm dishes, then collected in 500 uL lysis buffer on ice for 30 min. The lysates were centrifugated for 15 min (4 ℃, 12,000 g) and supernatant was collected. Samples was added with 10 µL DDDDK-Agarose (bimake, Shanghai, China) and rotated overnight at 4 ℃. The beads were washed, 20 HL of 2 x SDS- PAGE loading buffer was added to each, and heated at 100 ℃ for 5 min for Western blotting analysis.
The protein lysates of control and CurE treated cells were obtained as described. Equal quantities of proteins were incubated with CDK1 antibodies or IgG control and rotated overnight at 4 ℃. Protein complexes were collected with pro- tein A/G agarose beads (Beyotime Technology) followed by washing 5 times and prepared for Western blotting.
Western blotting
RIPA reagent with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail was used to extract total protein (Applygen, Bei- jing, China) for 30 min on ice. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 ℃ and supernatants were col- lected. Equivalent amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and incubated with primary antibodies (Additional file 8: Table S1) at 4 ℃ for 12 h. The blots were then washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. After washing, the blots were incubated with SuperECL reagent, protein bands were visualized, and image densities were quantitated using a Tanon imaging system.
Xenograft model of nude mice
All animal experiments were carried out following the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Female BALB/c-nu nude mice (16-18 g) were obtained from the Charles River Co. (Beijing, China) and housed at the Insti- tute of Materia Medica animal barrier facility.
In the first part, mice were randomly divided into six per group, and aliquots of 1 x 106 SW-13_NC, SW-13_CDK1, NCI-H295R_shNC, or NCI-H295R_shCDK1 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank (n=6). The tumor volume (mm3) and body weight (g) were meas- ured every 2 days. At the end of experiment, the mice were euthanized, and the tumors were excised, weighed and photographed.
To determine the effect of CDK1 inhibitor treatment, SW-13 cells (1 × 108 cells/mL) were subcutaneously injected into the right sides of the mice. After 14 days, when the tumor volume had reached about 100 mm3, the mice were randomly assigned to five groups (n=6) for the following treatments: (1) no treatment, (2) 40 mg/kg mitotane i.p., (3) 10 mg/kg CurE i.p., (4) 20 mg/kg CurE, i.p., and (5) 10 mg/ kg CurE plus 40 mg/kg mitotane, i.p., once a day for 3 weeks. Body weight (g) and tumor volume (V, mm3) were measured every 2 days. All the mice were euthanized after 3 weeks, and the organs and tumors were collected, weighed and photographed.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) were carried out using kits according to manufacturer’s instructions. The expression of Slug and Twist was detected via IHC staining in the tumor tissues formed from SW-13 NC, SW-13_CDK1, NCI-H295R_shNC, NCI-H295R shCDK1 cells in the xenograft assays. The expression of ZBP1 was detected in tumor tissues from mice treated with 10 mg/kg CurE (low) and 20 mg/kg CurE (high) via IF stain- ing. A Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope was used to image the stained sections.
Statistical analysis
All the results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance among the groups was determined using GraphPad Prism 7.0 with one-way ANOVA, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
CDK1 could be a therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker for ACC
To investigate the expression pattern of CDK1 in ACC, bioinformatic analysis was conducted on the GTEx,
(See figure on next page.)
Fig. 2 CDK1 facilitated the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ACC cells via Slug and Twist. a Overexpression of CDK1 elevated invasion and migration of SW-13 cells. b Knockdown of CDK1 expression reduced migration and invasion of NCI-H295R cells. c CDK1 regulated expression of metastasis-related proteins. d CDK1 interacted with Slug and Twist. e Knockdown of Slug reversed the pro-metastatic effect of CDK1. f Effect of Slug on CDK1-regulated pathways of metastasis. g Knockdown of Twist blocked CDK1’s pro-metastatic activity. h Effect of Twist on CDK1-regulated pathways of metastasis. i CDK1 influenced expression of Slug and Twist in vivo. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data was presented as mean± SD. *** P <0.001 vs. control group
a
SW-13
C
SW-13
NCI-H295R
NC
CDK1
CDK1
+
-
-
shCDK1
+
+
Migration
SPAG5
150
400-
NC
- 135
CDK1
N-cadherin
- 140
Cell numbers
300-
200
MMP2
- 72
Invasion
100-
MMP9
- 92
0
Slug
- 30
Migration
Invasion
Twist
- 26
b
NCI-H295R
shNC
shCDK1_1
shCDK1_2
ß-actin
- 45
Migration
d
250-
shNC
SW-13
200-
Input
Co-IP
Cell numbers
shCDK1_1
shCDK1_2
NC
CDK1
NC
CDK1
150-
CDK1
34
100
Slug
-30
Invasion
50
Twist
- 26
0
Migration
Invasion
1500-
%
e
Cell numbers
SW-13
1000
CDK1
+
+
+
siSlug
+
+
500
Migration
0
CDK1
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
siSlug
+
+
+
+
Migration
Invasion
SW-13
-
f
CDK1
-
+
+
+
Invasion
siSlug
-
-
+
+
Slug
- 30
N-cadhenin
- 140
g
SW-13
MMP2
- 72
CDK1
+
+
+
siTwist
+
+
MMP9
- 92
Migration
ß-actin
- 45
1500-
*
1000
Invasion
Cell numbers
500
0
CDK1
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
siTwist
+
+
-
+
+
Migration
Invasion
h
İ
SW-13
SW-13
NCI-H295R
NC
CDK1
shNC
shCDK1
CDK1
-
+
+
+
siTwist
-
+
+
Twist
Slug
Slug
- 30
N-cadhenin
- 140
MMP2
- 72
Twist
MMP9
- 92
Twist
ß-actin
- 45
50 pm
50 um
Fig. 2 (See legend on previous page.)
TCGA, and Oncomine databases. Results suggested that CDK1 was abnormally elevated in the majority of tumors relative to healthy controls (Additional file 1: Fig. S1 a-b). CDK1 was abnormally elevated in ACC (Additional file 1: Fig. S1c) and the elevated expression of CDK1 closely tracked with the pathological stage (Additional file 1: Fig. S1d) and nodal metastatic status of ACC patients (Additional file 1: Fig. S1e). Correlation analysis results also indicated that CDK1 expression was related to TNM stage (P<0.001), tumor status (P<0.001) and pathologi- cal stage (P<0.001). In addition, the expression level of CDK1 was associated with the outcome of primary ther- apy (P<0.001), overall survival (OS) (P<0.001), disease- specific survival (DSS) (P<0.001) and progression-free interval (PFI) (P<0.001) (Table 1). The Kaplan-Meier analysis also indicated a relationship between CDK1 expression and OS (P<0.0001), DSS (P<0.0001) and PFI (P<0.0001) survival probability of ACC patients (Addi- tional file 1: Fig. S1f-h). ROC curve of CDK1 expression and OS, DSS and PFI survival suggested that CDK1 could be used as a prognostic indicator of ACC (Additional file 1: Fig. Sli-k). The above results indicated that CDK1 was abnormally elevated in ACC and that its expression level could serve as a prognostic biomarker as well as a potential therapeutic target for ACC.
CDK1 facilitated the proliferation of ACC cells in vitro and in vivo
To assess the influence of CDK1 on the proliferation of ACC cells, the growth in liquid medium, 3D Matrigel, soft agar, and nude mice was evaluated. Upregulation of CDK1 increased the growth of SW-13 cells in culture medium (Fig. 1a-b), promoted colony formation in soft agar (Fig. 1c), invasiveness in 3D Matrigel (Fig. 1d), and the growth of tumors in nude mice (Fig. 1e). In contrast, downregulation of CDK1 in NCI-H295R cells remark- ably suppressed their growth (Fig. 1f-g), colony forma- tion in soft agar (Fig. 1h), and invasiveness in 3D Matrigel (Fig. 1i). Downregulating CDK1 in NCI-H295R cells also suppressed the growth of these tumor cells in nude mice (Fig. 1j). Thus, CDK1 is significantly associated with
the proliferation of ACC cells and could be utilized as a potential target for ACC therapy.
Differential gene expression and enrichment analysis after upregulation of CDK1 in SW-13 cells
The expression of CDK1 in ACC cell lines was deter- mined by Western blotting, and the results showed that CDK1 expression was lower in SW-13 cells than in NCI- H295R cells (Additional file 2: Fig. S2a). To investigate the underlying mechanism of CDK1’s effects in ACC, the sequences of RNA isolated from cells in the SW-13 CDK1 group were compared to those from the SW-13_ NC group. There were 66 significantly upregulated genes and 104 downregulated genes in the SW-13_CDK1 group (Additional file 2: Fig. S2b). The GO enrichment results of differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) suggested that CDK1 participated in cell-cell adhesion, muscle structure development, angiogenesis and cell proliferation. (Addi- tional file 2: Fig. S2c). KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs also indicated that CDK1 could regulate cell adhe- sion molecules, epithelial cell signaling, and cell cycle pathways (Additional file 2: Fig. S2d). Reactome enrich- ment indicated that CDK1 might play an essential role in GPCR signaling (Additional file 2: Fig. S2e). Based on these RNA-seq results, we speculated that CDK1 played a vital part in the proliferation and metastasis of ACC cells.
CDK1 facilitated the EMT of ACC cells
To further evaluate the role of CDK1 on the metastasis of ACC cells, migration and invasion experiments were conducted. Results showed that upregulation of CDK1 elevated the invasion and migration capability of SW-13 cells (Fig. 2a), while downregulation of CDK1 suppressed the invasion and migration of NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 2b). CDK1 could also influence the EMT process of ACC cells by altering the expression of EMT-related essential pro- teins like SPAG5, N-cadherin, MMP2/7, Slug and Twist (Fig. 2c). Co-IP experiments were performed to investi- gate downstream targets of CDK1 and results were con- sistent with interaction between CDK1 and Slug and
(See figure on next page.)
Fig. 3 CDK1 inhibitor CurE inhibited proliferation of ACC cells in vitro and in vivo. a IC50 values (CCK-8 assay) of CDK1 inhibitors indicated that CurE had the best dose-dependent inhibitory activity in SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. b Chemical structure of CurE. c IC50 values of CurE on SW-13 cells at 24, 48 and 72 h were 0.19, 0.13 and 0.11 umol/L, respectively. IC50 values of CurE on NCI-H295R cells at 24, 48 and 72 h were 1.632, 0.732 and 0.464 umol/L respectively. d CurE dose-dependently suppressed the invasion and migration of SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. e CurE dose-dependently suppressed soft agar colony formation of SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. f Diagram of xenograft experiment in nude mice for assessing antitumor effects of CurE. g Images of xenograft tumors of each group. Animal experiments were grouped as follows: vehicle, Mtn (40 mg/kg), CurE (10 mg/kg), CurE (20 mg/kg) and co-administration of Mtn (40 mg/kg) and CurE (10 mg/kg). h-i CurE dose-dependently reduced tumor weight h and tumor volume i, and its inhibitory effect was greater than that of the positive drug, Mtn; tumors in the drug combination group almost disappeared. j Body weight remained stable during drug administration in each group. k Relative organ weights showed no significant differences between groups. Data was shown as mean ±SD. ** P <0.01 vs. Mtn group, *** P< 0.001, ** P <0.01, *P <0.05 vs. vehicle group
a
b
SW-13 48h
NCI-H295R 48h
O
O
100-
100-
Inhibition Rate (100%)
80
Inhibition Rate (100% )
Prazosin
HO
O
80
Ro_3306
O
I
W& H
60
60
+ Cucurbitacin E
OH
AZD-5438
HO
H
H
40
40-
GSK3 I-IX
E
20
20-
I
A
0
0
O
1
C
-20-
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
4.5
Log[Con.(uM)]
-20-
00
0.5
1.0
1.5
Log[Con.(UM)]
C
d
CucurbitacinE (umol/L)
SW-13 Cucurbitacin E
NCI-H295R Cucurbitacin E
0
0.03
0.1
0.3
120-
Inhibition Rate (100%)
24h
120-
24h
100.
48h
Inhibition Rate (100% )
100
48h
80
72h
80-
72h
SW-13
60-
60
40-
40-
20
20-
0
0
-20-
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
-1
0
1
2
Log[Con.(UM)]
-20-
Log[Con.(UM)]
CucurbitacinE (umol/L)
e
0
0.3
1
3
CucurbitacinE
NCI-H295R
0
0.003
0.01
0.03
umol/L
Migration
SW13
250-
SW-13
500-
NCI-H295R
Invasion
Number of colony
200
Number of colony
400
150-
300
100-
200
50
100
-
CucurbitacinE
0
0
CurE
0
0.03
0.1
0.3
pmol/L
CurE
0
0.3
1
3
pmol/L
0
0.03
0.1
0.3
umol/L
!
Migration
f
X
NCI-H295R
*
100 mm
0
Invasion
1*107 SW-13
14 Days
Mtn (i.p) CurE (i.p)
21 Days
Scarifice
cells injected
g
h
i
Vehicle
-
N
800-
1000-
Vehicle
00
Mtn 40mg/kg
Tumor weight (mg)
Tumor volume (mm3)
800-
Mtn
5
600
CurE_Low
600-
CurE_High
CurE_Low 10 mg/kg
400
Mtn+CurE
00
400
~
200
CurE_High 20 mg/kg
8
200
C
0
0
Mtn (40mg/kg) CurE (10mg/kg)
Vehicle
Mtn
CurE_Low
CurE_High
Mtn+CurE
0
3
6
9
2
5
18
2
Days after treatment
=
-
j
25-
k
Vehicle
8.
Relative organ weight
☐ Vehicle
Body weight (g)
20
Mtn
☐ Mtn
+ CurE_Low
6
☐ CurE_Low
15-
CurE_High
☐ CurE_High
Mtn+CurE
4.
Mtn+CurE
10-
5.
2.
0
0
M
In
3
6
9
12
15
18
Heart
Liver
spleen
lung
kidney
Days after treatment
21
Fig. 3 (See legend on previous page.)
Twist, which are essential proteins in metastatic signaling (Fig. 2d). Knockdown of Slug (Fig. 2e) or Twist (Fig. 2g) reversed the pro-metastatic effect of CDK1 and knock- down of Slug (Fig. 2f) or Twist (Fig. 2h) could inhibit CDK1-regulated pathways of metastasis. IHC experi- ments suggested that CDK1 also influenced the expres- sion of Slug and Twist in vivo (Fig. 2i). Thus, we conclude that CDK1 could facilitate the EMT in ACC cells by regu- lating Slug and Twist.
CDK1 inhibitor CurE reduced the proliferation of ACC cells in vitro and in vivo
To further evaluate the potential of CDK1 as a therapeu- tic target for ACC, we screened several CDK1 inhibi- tors for antitumor activity on ACC cell lines. Results revealed that CurE had the best inhibitory activity with good dose-dependency on SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 3a). Subsequent experiments verified that CurE (Fig. 3b) could time- and dose-dependently suppress the growth of NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells at nanomolar concentrations (Fig. 3c). CurE also inhibited colony for- mation of SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 3d) in the soft agar assay and suppressed their invasion and migra- tion (Fig. 3e). CurE was tested in a nude mouse xenograft model of ACC (Fig. 3f) and it significantly and dose- dependently suppressed tumor growth in comparison with the vehicle group. The tumor weight and volume were reduced after treatment of CurE, and the therapeu- tic effect of 20 mg/kg of CurE (ip) was significantly better than that of the positive control drug, mitotane, at 40 mg/ kg (ip). More importantly, the tumors were almost gone after 21 days of co-administration of 10 mg/kg CurE and 40 mg/kg mitotane (Fig. 3g-i). The body weight (Fig. 3j), morphological characteristics of organs including liver, heart, kidney, spleen, and lung remained stable (Fig. 3k) under the administration of CurE. No noticeable toxicity was identified through physiological blood tests (Addi- tional file 3: Fig. S3). From the above results, we conclude that CurE can suppress the proliferation of ACC cells without observable toxic effects.
Differential gene expression and enrichment analysis of SW-13 cells after treatment with CurE
To investigate the molecular mechanism of CurE’s anti- tumor effect against ACC, RNA-seq was carried out. We
found 115 downregulated genes and 274 upregulated genes in SW-13 cells treated with CurE (Additional file 4: Fig. S4a). GO enrichment of the DEGs suggested that CurE principally regulated the apoptotic signaling pathway, the G2/M phase transition in the cell cycle, epithelial cell-cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis pathways (Additional file 4: Fig. S4b). The KEGG pathway enrich- ment indicated that CurE could regulate the cell cycle, the synthesis and metabolism of amino acids, cell adhesion molecules, P53 and PPAR signaling pathway, DNA replica- tion, necroptosis and cellular senescence (Additional file 4: Fig. S4c). Reactome enrichment suggested that CurE par- ticipated in the S phase, G2/M checkpoints, MyD88-related pathway, CDK-mediated phosphorylation, antigen process- ing, proteasome degradation, apoptosis and programmed cell death (PCD) (Additional file 4: Fig. S4d). Overall, these results suggested that CurE could inhibit ACC cells by reg- ulating the cell cycle, metastasis, and PCD.
CDK1 could regulate the G2/M phase transition in ACC cells
The Edu assay revealed that CDK1 could enhance DNA synthesis activity in ACC cells (Fig. 4a). Overexpres- sion of CDK1 reduced the percentage of G2/M phase cells and increased the number of SW-13 cells in S phase (Fig. 4b). Knockdown of CDK1 arrested the NCI-H295R cells in G2/M phase (Fig. 4c). Western blotting and co-IP experiments showed that CDK1 could interact with the mitosis-associated proteins, UBE2C and AURKA/B, and regulate their expression (Fig. 4d-e). The protein stabili- ties of UBE2C and AURKA/B were significantly elevated in CDK1-overexpressing cells (Additional file 5: Fig. S5a-d). The effects of CurE on cell cycle in ACC cells were iden- tified by flow cytometry and CurE was shown to reduce DNA synthesis in SW-13 (Fig. 4f) and NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 4g) in a dose-dependent way. CurE could time- and dose-dependently block the G2/M phase of the cell cycle of SW-13 (Fig. 4h) and NCI-H295R (Fig. 4i). In addition, CurE dose-dependently inhibited the expression of UBE- 2Cand AURKA/B. Thus, we concluded that CDK1 regu- lated the G2/M phase in ACC cells by regulating UBE2C and AURKA/B.
CDK1 inhibitor CurE can induce PANoptosis in ACC cells The effect of CurE on morphology was observed in NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells at 3, 6 and 12 h. Spherical
(See figure on next page.)
Fig. 4 CDK1 regulated G2/M phase transition of ACC cells through interaction with UBE2C and AURKA/B. a Overexpression of CDK1 promoted DNA synthesis of SW-13 cells, while CDK1 knockdown suppressed DNA synthesis in NCI-H295R cells. b Overexpression of CDK1 reduced the percentage of G2/M phase cells and increased S phase in SW-13 cells. c Knockdown of CDK1 expression blocked the G2/M transition of NCI-H295R cells. d CDK1 altered the expression of UBE2C and AURKA/B. e CDK1 interacted with UBE2C and AURKA/B. f CurE suppressed DNA synthesis of SW-13 cells. g CurE suppressed DNA synthesis of NCI-H295R cells. h CurE time- and dose-dependently suppressed the G2/M phase in SW-13 cells. i CurE time- and dose-dependently suppressed the G2/M phase of NCI-H295R cells. j CurE blocked phosphorylation of CDK1 and reduced UBE2C and AURKA/B expression. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data was presented as mean ±SD. ** P <0.01, *** P < 0.001 vs. control group
a
SW-13
NCI-H295R
NC
CDK1
shNC
shCDK1_1
shCDK1_2
Merge
Merge
Percentage of Edu positive cells
100-
80.
T
2
SP
P
60
Edu
Edu
&
1
3
5
40.
-
20-
Hoechst33342
Hoechst33342
0
NC CDK1
shNC sh1
sh2
SW-13
NCI-H295R
-
b
SW-13 NC
SW-13 CDK1
SW-13
d
SW-13
NCI-H295R
60
CDK1
+
500
Cell numbers
Cell Proportion (%)
-
NC
400
T
shCDK1
+
400
-
CDK1
+
40
T
UBE2C
- 20
300
300
200
200
20
T
AURKA
48
4
100
100
AURKB
.40
2.
.
0
5
G2/M
Đ
2.0M
40M
·
40M
à
ß-actin
. 45
PI
C
NCI-H295R
SW-13
NCI-H295R shNC
NCI-H295R shCDK1-1
NCI-H295R shCDK1-2
50-
e
Input
Co-IP
500
400
250
Cell Proportion (%)
shNC
40-
T
CDK1
NC
CDK1
Cell numbers
shCDK1-1
NC
400
200
200
30
Y
T
shCDK1-2
CDK1
34
300
150
200
20-
UBE2C
20
200
10
100
AURKA
48
100
0
2
0
1
0
5
G2/M
AURKB
40
0
2.04
0
·
PI
f
CurE (mol/L) 24h
g
Control
CurE (umol/L) 24h
0.03
0.1
0.3
Control
0.3
1
3
Hoechst 33342
Hoechst 33342
Edu
Edu
Merge
Merge
h
120-
SW-13 24h
SW-13 48h
SW-13
Cell Proportion (%)
100
G2/M
120-
0 pmol/L
0.03 umol/L
0.1 umol/L
0.3 pmol/L
S
Cell Proportion (%)
100
G2/M
S
NO
80
G1
G1
800
-
80
200
60
60
24h
40
40
Cell numbers
20
20
CurE
0
Me
0
6ª
pmol/L
CurE
Q
0
0
6ª
6?
umol/L
NCI-H295R 48h
-
-
0
-
NCI-H295R 24h
-
120-
Cell Proportion (%)
100
G2/M
120-
1ª
$
100
T
G2/M
Cell Proportion (%)
s
-
80-
G1
80
G1
48h
60
60
-
-
-
40
=
40
T
20
20.
0
O.
-
-
-
-
-
-
CurE
0
%
,
umol/L
CurE
0
4
3
pmol/L
PI
j
NCI-H295R
0 pmol/L
0.3 umol/L
1 µmol/L
3 umol/L
SW-13 24h
NCI-H295R 24h
-
CurE
0
0.03
0.1
0.3
0
0.3
1
3 umol/L
-
-34
10
-
24h
CDK1
0
Cell numbers
-
p-CDK1(Y15)
-34
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
UBE2C
- 20
00
10ª
Nº
-
48h
AURKA
- 48
-
AURKB
-
- 40
₩
4.
·
-
-
-
-
ß-actin
o
1.84
-
-
1.84
204
- 45
PI
Fig. 4 (See legend on previous page.)
membrane protrusions were observed in NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells (Fig. 5a). CurE time- and dose-depend- ently promoted the release of LDH in SW-13 and NCI- H295R cells (Fig. 5b), corresponding to increased damage to the plasma membrane allowing leakage. The cytotoxic- ity of CurE could be partially rescued by co-administra- tion of the apoptosis/pyroptosis inhibitor, VAD, and the necroptosis inhibitor, Nec, but it could not be reversed by using them alone or using the autophagy inhibitor, 3-MA (Fig. 5c). PI-annexin V staining was used to determine the type of cell death. The early phase of apoptosis was rep- resented by single-positive staining for annexin V, while the late phase of apoptosis or pyroptosis showed double- positive staining [21]. Annexin V-PI double staining sug- gested that CurE time- and dose-dependently increased the percentage of necrotic and pyroptotic/apoptotic cells of SW-13 (Fig. 5d) and NCI-H295R (Fig. 5e).
Western blotting results indicated that the anti-apop- totic protein, Bcl-2, was remarkably reduced after treat- ment with CurE, while the pro-apoptotic proteins, Bax and Bim, were elevated in comparison with the control group. CurE increased the expression level of cleaved caspase 3 (CASP3), cleaved PARP and cleaved caspase 7 (CASP7) in SW-13 (Fig. 5f) and NCI-H295R (Fig. 5i) cells in a time-dependent manner. The characteristics of pyroptosis include gasdermin family-regulated pore generation in the cytomembrane, cell turgescence, and cytomembrane disruption, together with leakage of the proinflammatory cytokines [22]. Caspase 1 could cleave gasdermin D (GSDMD-FL) to produce an N-ter- minal cleavage product (GSDMD-N) under activation, which could induce pyroptosis by generating cytomem- brane pores and leaking inflammatory cytokines [21]. Nuclear factor-KB (NF-KB) chiefly facilitates the produc- tion of proinflammatory effectors, like NLRP3, Myd88 and caspase 1 [23]. The results also indicated that CurE time-dependently elevated the expression of NF-KB and caspase 1 in SW-13 (Fig. 5g) and NCI-H295R (Fig. 5j) cells and significantly upregulated the expression of GSDMD-N. After treatment with CurE, the expression of Myd88 was found to be significantly increased, whereas no significant changes were seen in NLRP3.
Necroptosis is a caspase-independent necrotic cell death, which is mediated by strictly regulated cellular signaling pathways. It is chiefly regulated via receptor- interacting protein 3 (RIP3), RIP1, and mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) [24]. ZBP1 can induce PAN- optosis of cells when it senses the Z-RNA produced during infection with influenza virus [25]. Results of Western blotting suggested that the expression levels of RIP1, RIP3 and MLKL were remarkably elevated after administration of CurE, and that the ZBP1 expression was significantly elevated in comparison with the control group (Fig. 5h, k). Based on the above results, CurE could induce PANoptosis of ACC cells in a caspase-independ- ent way.
CDK1 regulated the PANoptosis of ACC cells through binding with the PANoptosome in a ZBP1-dependent way
To further explore the mechanism of CDK1 in regulating PANoptosis, we evaluate the relationship between CDK1 and the PANoptosome. Co-IP experiments showed that CurE could induce the formation of PANoptosomes and that CDK1 could bind to the PANoptosome in SW-13 cells (Fig. 6a) and NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 6b). Immuno- fluorescence experiments showed that CDK1 co-local- ized with ZBP1 in SW-13 (Fig. 6c) and NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 6d). Silencing ZBP1 could rescue the cell death trig- gered by CurE in SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 6e). And when ZBP1 was knockdown, it could inhibit the marker proteins of apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis which were triggered by CurE (Fig. 6f). In addition, when caspase 3 was knocked down, the percentage of necrotic cells was raised after treatment with CurE, whereas the overall cell survival rate didn’t significantly change in NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells. Similarly, when GSDMD was knocked down, the proportion of necrotic cells was increased, but the overall cell survival didn’t change significantly (Additional file 6: Fig. S6a-h). The above results indicated that when the pathways of apoptosis and pyroptosis were inhibited, CurE was able to suppress the proliferation of ACC cells via triggering cell necroptosis instead. These results also suggested that CurE inhibited
(See figure on next page.)
Fig. 5 CDK1 inhibitor CurE induced apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis) in ACC cells. a Effect of CurE on morphology of NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells at 3, 6 and 12 h. Spherical membranal protrusions were observed in NCI-H295R and SW-13 cells. b CurE caused the release of LDH from SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. c The cytotoxicity of CurE could be partially rescued by combined treatment with Z-VAD-FMK (VAD) and necrosulfonamide (Nec), while it could not be restored by using them alone or using autophagy inhibitor 3-MA. d, e Annexin V-PI double staining showed that CurE increased the percentage of necrotic and apoptotic/pyroptotic SW-13 cells d and NCI-H295R e cells. f, i CurE time-dependently increased the expression of apoptosis marker protein, cleaved caspase 3/7, and altered the expression of other apoptosis-related proteins in SW-13 (f) and NCI-H295R (i) cells. g, j CurE time-dependently increased the expression of pyroptosis marker protein, GSDMD, and altered the expression of other pyroptosis-related proteins in SW-13 (g) and NCI-H295R (j) cells. h, k CurE time-dependently increased the expression of necroptosis marker protein, MLKL, and altered the expression of other necroptosis-related proteins in SW-13 (h) and NCI-H295R (k) cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data was presented as mean ± SD. *** P < 0.001 vs. control group
a
b
SW-13 24h
SW-13 48h
0h
3h
6h
12h
120-
100-
Cytotoxicity(%)
100
Cytotoxicity(%)
80
1
1
80.
T
60
SW-13
60-
1
40
—
40
,
20-
20
2
0
0
-20
-20
C
0
6.05
0ª
03
umol/L
0
0.03
0ª
03
μmollL
-
1
F
1
NCI-H295R 24h
NCI-H295R 48h
1
2
1
10
100-
100
NCI-H295R
S
1
Cytotoxicity(%)
80
Cytotoxicity(% )
80
8
1
1
L
60
60
,
៛
9
1
C
.
6
40
8
40
1
6
20
T
20
3
O
100 pm
8
8
0
0
1
100 pm
-20
-20
J
.
0
03
A
3
umol/L
0
03
4
5
pmol/L
C
Live cell proportions (%)
120-
Live cell proportions (%)
120
120-
Live cell proportions (%)
120
SW-13
T
T
5
T
T
T
Live cell proportions (%)
T
ST
T
T
T
T
T
NCI-H295R
90
T
90
90
T
90
T
T
T
60-
60
60
₸
60
ns
ns
**
T
30-
30
30
T
30
*
0
0
0
0
CurE
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
CurE
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
CurE
+
+
-
-
+
+
CurE
+
+
-
+
+
3-MA
+
VAD
+
+
Nec
+
+
VAD
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
Nec
+
+
+
+
d
SW-13
e
NCI-H295R
0 umol/L
0.03 umol/L
0.1 umol/L
0.3 pmol/L
0 pmol/L
0.3 umol/L
1 pmol/L
3 pmol/L
%
02
133
133
9
A
107
-
·
2.06
91
3ª
195
*
5
91
1
2
M
SIE
15
45.
49
ª
1ª
100
24h
1º
2ª ₾
-
24h
*
“
15
-
®
-
5
2ª
vª
36
”
-
-
1º
2
2
1ª
7
0
6ª
0)
7
.”
82.0
st
1.29
!
9
2.
3
4.20
4
0
«
M.”
1.
93
9
”
·
SPA
1º
19
1
Hp
-
10*
1º
1ª
NO
”
-
Hp”
Hp”
Ha
Na2ª
”
NO
-
107
·
ª
1
HÃ
1ª
102
-
?
12
9º
võ”
p’
a?
w
-
1º
Ng
1º7
N
4
SY
16
9
Út
-
-
NO
0.54
6
1
,
121
1ª
SỐ
1º
1º
”
4ª
!!
48h
199
Na”
«
-
48h
na
O
1
-
1.
NO
4
3ª
4
-
4ª
-
2
”
”
=
3
-
w
82
04
2
.ª 4ª
0
3 8
OD
a’
0.11
0.58
*
NO
n’
2.11
-
93
199
-’
.
Mª
PO
ART
- ”
«
-
+
NO
2
aª
-
07
-
-
**
”
”
8
3
1º
a”
2
3
s+
.
”
9
”
2
”
2ª
”
-
-
-
£
Ne
2
No’
Annexin V-FITC
Annexin V-FITC
+
SW-13 24h
SW-13 48h
NCI-H295R 24h
NCI-H295R 48h
120-
120-
Cell Proportion (%)
Cell Proportion (%)
Necrotic cells
120-
120-
Late apoptotic/ Pyroptotic cells
Necrotic cells
100
00
Cell Proportion (%)
100
Cell Proportion (%)
100
Late apoptotic/ Pyroptotic ce
80
80
Early apoptotic cells
Normal cells
80-
80-
Early apoptotic cells
60
60
Normal cells
60
60
40
40
40
40-
20
20
20
20-
0
0
0
CurE
0
0.03
04
03
μΜ
CurE
0
0.03
04
0
μΜ
Q
CurE
0
03
A
3
μΜ
CurE
0
A
3
UM
f
g
h
SW-13
CurE
SW-13
0
3
6
12
24
48
h
CurE
0
3
6
12
24
SW-13
48
h
Bcl-2
26
NF-KB
- 65
CurE
0
3
6
12
24
48
h
Bax
- 20
ZBP1
- 46
Myd88
-33
Bim
23
RIP1
- 78
Caspase 1
- 48
Cleaved PARP
89
RIP3
60
NLRP3
- 110
Cleaved Caspase 3
MLKL
-17
- 54
- 53
Cleaved Caspase 7
17
GSDMD
ß-actin
- 45
- 30
ß-actin
45
ß-actin
- 45
i
j
k
NCI-H295R
NCI-H295R
CurE
0
3
6
12
24
48
h
CurE
0
3
6
12
24
48
h
NCI-H295R
Bcl-2
- 26
NF-KB
A
- 65
·
CurE
0
3
6
12
24
48
h
Bax
- 20
Myd88
- 33
ZBP1
46
Bim
- 23
Caspase 1
- 48
RIP1
-78
Cleaved PARP
- 89
NLRP3
- 110
RIP3
60
Cleaved Caspase 3
- 17
MLKL
GSDMD-FL
- 53
54
Cleaved Caspase 7
- 17
GSDMD-N
- 30
ß-actin
45
ß-actin
- 45
ß-actin
- 45
Fig. 5 (See legend on previous page.)
the proliferation of ACC cells through triggering PANo- ptosis. Furthermore, immunofluorescence experiments also showed that ZBP1 was upregulated with adminis- tration of CurE in vivo (Fig. 6g). In addition, the experi- mental results showed that knockdown of CDK1 could significantly reverse the inhibitory effect of CurE on ACC cell lines (Additional file 7: Fig. S7a-f), which indicated that the above effects of CurE were due to the CDK1 inhibition. In conclusion, CDK1 regulated the PANopto- sis of ACC cells through binding with the PANoptosome in a ZBP1-dependent way.
Discussion
ACC is an aggressive and extremely rare endocrine neo- plasm with poor prognosis [26]. So far, mitotane is the only approved therapeutic drug for ACC since 1970 despite its suboptimal efficacy [27]. No new drug has been developed for ACC since 1970. Thus, it is critically necessary to identify novel therapeutic targets and drugs for ACC. Our experimental results showed that CDK1 could be an essential prognostic and therapeutic target of ACC via regulation of EMT, G2/M phase and PANopto- sis. Thus, CurE with its good record of safety and efficacy is a likely candidate for ACC therapy, which will provide much-needed help for patients with ACC.
There are few studies on ACC and its therapeutic tar- gets because ACC is such a rare endocrine malignant disease. It was reported that TOP2A was abnormally elevated in ACC and regulated cell growth and metasta- sis of ACC cells [28]. CDK4 was highly expressed in ACC and several CDK4 inhibitors could decrease the growth rate of ACC cell lines in vitro [29]. However, none of these studies have made further progress and the treat- ment situation of ACC is still grim. As CDK1 was abnor- mally elevated in the majority of tumors, we explored its expression pattern in ACC and found that CDK1 expres- sion was significantly elevated. Various bioinformatics analysis studies also pointed out that CDK1 was upregu- lated in ACC with prognostic significance [30-32]. One study suggested that the overexpressed centromere pro- tein F (CENPF)/CDK1 signaling pathway enhanced the progression of ACC via regulating the G2/M-phase cell cycle [33]. Therefore, we proposed that CDK1 might become a promising target for ACC treatment.
Our results demonstrated that CDK1 was significantly overexpressed in ACC and that the expression level of
CDK1 was correlated with the pathological stage and nodal metastasis status of ACC with prognostic signifi- cance. The upregulation of CDK1 facilitated the growth and metastasis of ACC cells, whereas CDK1 knockdown had the opposite effect. RNA sequence and CO-IP exper- iments showed CDK1 interacting with mitosis-associated protein UBE2C [34], AURKA [35] and AURKB, and with Slug and Twist, which are essential proteins in meta- static signaling. In view of these findings, we propose that CDK1 plays a vital part in the growth and metastasis of ACC and therefore should be a promising target for ACC therapy.
Almost five decades ago, mitotane was approved as the only first-line therapeutic drug of ACC. However, the prognosis of ACC patients remains unsatisfactory and new effective drugs for ACC are still in urgent need of development [36]. Targeting CDK1 has been a promising antitumor approach for drug development. Numerous phase II/III and phase I clinical trials have been conducted to test the effect and assess the safety of CDK1 inhibitors. The PLK1 inhibitor, rigosertib, entered the clinical research stage at phase II/III for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and glioma [6, 7]. Through screening CDK1 inhibitors in ACC cell lines, we established that CurE had the best inhibitory effect with clear time- and dose-dependency. Other studies showed that CurE was able to chemo-sensitize colon tumor cells by regulating TFAP4/Wnt/beta-catenin signaling [37] and inhibit the proliferation of pan- creatic adenocarcinoma cells by modulating STAT3 signaling [38]. CurE also suppressed the brain metas- tasis of lung carcinoma cells in vivo by inhibiting the Yes-related signaling pathway [39]. Our results first found that CurE suppressed cell growth and metasta- sis of ACC cells in vitro at nanomolar concentrations, and that it could induce PANoptosis in ACC cells in a ZBP1-dependent and caspase-independent way. In addition, administration of CurE inhibited ACC tumor proliferation in vivo without noticeable toxic effects in a nude mouse xenograft model and showed better therapeutic effect than mitotane, which is the only drug currently approved for ACC treatment. More impor- tantly, the combined treatment of CurE with mitotane nearly eliminated the ACC xenograft tumors. These results support the idea that CurE is a promising drug
(See figure on next page.)
Fig. 6 CDK1 regulated the PANoptosis of ACC cells through binding to the PANoptosome in a ZBP1-dependent way. a Co-IP data showed that CDK1 could bind to the PANoptosome in SW-13 cells, and b in NCI-H295R cells. c Immunofluorescence showed that CDK1 co-localized with ZBP1 in SW-13 cells, and d in NCI-H295R cells. e Silencing ZBP1 could rescue cell death triggered by CurE in SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. f Silencing ZBP1 inhibited the marker proteins of apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. g Immunofluorescence showed that ZBP1 was upregulated by administration of CurE in vivo
CurE
VAD+Nec
a
Ctrl
VAD
Ctrl
CurE
VAD+Nec
Nec
VAD
Nec
NLRP3
- 110
NLRP3
- 110
RIP1
- 78
RIP1
- 78
Lysate
RIP3
- 60
IP: CDK1
RIP3
- 60
ZBP1
- 46
ZBP1
- 46
CAP1
- 48
CAP1
- 48
CDK1
- 34
CDK1
- 34
ß-actin
- 55
lgG
- 55
b
VAD+Nec
Ctrl
CurE
VAD+Nec
VAD
Nec
Ctrl
CurE
VAD
Nec
NLRP3
- 110
NLRP3
- 110
RIP1
- 78
RIP1
- 78
Lysate
RIP3
- 60
IP: CDK1
RIP3
- 60
ZBP1
- 46
ZBP1
- 46
CAP1
- 48
CAP1
- 48
CDK1
- 34
CDK1
- 34
ß-actin
- 55
lgG
- 55
C
SW-13
d
NCI-H295R
ZBP1
CDK1
DAPI
Merge
ZBP1
CDK1
DAPI
Merge
Ctrl
Ctrl
CurE
CurE
EN
3
0
P
15
e
siZBP1 CurE
SW-13
+
+
120-
+
+
Cell Proportion (%)
100
T
Necrotic cells
Late apoptotic/ Pyroptotic cells
HỘI
01
1.38
92
18
01
1º
01
02
Early apoptotic cells
2.62
5.04
92
247
01
25.9
02
1.94
8.76
80
-
1º
2
Normal cells
60
SW-13
no”
10º
1º
40
20-
10”
10*
0
xp?
04
90.5
03
04
1
SiZBP1
-
+
-
+
4.59
2.02
12 3
2.93
19
84.8
93
~
CurE
Npª
182
-
+
+
1º
10ª
107
197
16ª
-
6ª
10?
NCI-H295R
8
01
92
02
10
02
NO”
01
92
120-
4.25
2.01
1.42
10.2
7.50
2.62
Necrotic cells
B
18º
NCI-H295R
Cell Proportion (%)
100
Late apoptotic/ Pyroptotic cells
80
Early apoptotic cells
B”
60
Normal cells
04
-
A
18
40
1º
187
2-34
04
03
18º
04
04
03
20-
62
.ª
6.62
47.4
4.57
6ª
80.9
.00
0
a?
15º
IO
1º
1º
18”
SİZBP1
-
+
.
+
Annexin V-FITC
CurE
·
+
+
f
SW-13
NCI-H295R
g
Vehicle
CurE_Low
CurE_High
siZBP1
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
CurE
+
+
+
+
ZBP1
- 46
ZBP1
Cleaved Caspase 3
- 17
Cleaved Caspase 7
- 17
GSDMD-FL
- 53
GSDMD-N
- 30
DAPI
MLKL
- 54
ß-actin
-45
50 um
Fig. 6 (See legend on previous page.)
O
O
HO
O
p
O
I
MOH
CDK1
HO
H
H
: Cur E
O
Cur E
Slug
PANpotosome
M
Early
Twist
ZBP1
RIPK3
G1
G2
Cell Cycle
RIPK1
NLRP3
S
CASP1
Late
Epithelial
Mesenchymal
UBE2C
AURKA/B
GSDMD
CASP 3/7
MLKL
Migration & Invasion
Pyroptosis
Apoptosis Necroptosis
G2/M Regulation
PANoptosis
Fig. 7 The role of CDK1 in ACC. CDK1 serves as a therapeutic target of adrenocortical carcinoma as a regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, G2/M phase, and PANoptosis. CurE is a probable candidate for the treatment of ACC by inhibiting CDK1
candidate for the treatment of ACC that could be used in combination with mitotane.
Programmed cell death (PCD), which is mediated via an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway, is one of the main targets in the antitumor drug search [13]. A novel identified pathway for PCD called PANoptosis is medi- ated through a PANoptosome, which is a newly recog- nized multimeric cytoplasmic protein complex [14]. The PANoptosome incorporates three crucial effectors of PCD in parallel: pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis [15]. Our results show that CDK1 can interact with the PANo- ptosome and that the CDK1 inhibitor induces PANoptosis of ACC cells in a ZBP1-dependent way. PANoptosis is a new mechanism for antitumor drug activity, and has not yet been reported by other antitumor drug-development researchers. PANoptosis can produce cell death in several different ways, so a tumor cell might not be able to develop resistance to CurE that easily. Also, we found that the therapeutic effect of a combination of CurE and mitotane was significantly greater than either alone, which means that more patients could be benefitted in clinical practice. ACC is a very rare malignant cancer that has received little attention from researchers and CurE may be the solution to meet the crucial needs of patients with ACC throughout the world.
Conclusions
In conclusion, CDK1 facilitated the EMT of ACC cells via Slug and Twist and regulated G2/M phase of ACC cells through regulating UBE2C and AURKA/B. CDK1 also mediated PANoptosis of ACC cells through binding to the PANoptosome in a ZBP1-dependent way. The CDK1 inhibitor CurE was found to significantly inhibit ACC cell proliferation and metastasis at low concentration both in vitro and in vivo with good safety and efficacy. Most importantly, the combined treatment of CurE and mito- tane virtually eliminated ACC tumors in nude mice. We conclude that CDK1 may serve as an essential prognostic and therapeutic target of ACC (Fig. 7). CurE is expected to be approved as the next potential drug for the treat- ment of ACC, especially in combination with mitotane.
Abbreviations
ACC: Adrenocortical carcinoma; Mtn: Mitotane; TCGA: The cancer genome atlas; Co-IP: Co-immunoprecipitation; IF: Immunofluorescence; EMT: Epithelial- mesenchymal transition; CurE: Cucurbitacin E; PANoptosis: The apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis; FDA: Food and Drug Administration; CDK1: Cyclin-dependent kinase 1; MMPs: Metalloproteinases; PCD: Programmed cell death; ZBP1: Z-DNA binding protein 1; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; NEB: New England biolabs; GO: Gene ontology; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; IF: Immu- nofluorescence; SD: Standard deviation; OS: Overall survival; DSS: Disease specific survival; PFI: Progression free interval; CASP3: Cleaved caspase 3; DEGs: Differential expressed genes; CASP7: Cleaved caspase 7; GSDMD: Gasdermin
D; NF-KB: Nuclear factor-KB; RIP3: Receptor-interacting protein 3; MLKL: Mixed lineage kinase domain-like; CHX: Cycloheximide.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi. org/10.1186/s12967-022-03641-y.
Additional file 1: Figure S1. CDK1 is a potential target and prognos- tic biomarker of ACC. a CDK1 was abnormally upregulated in multiple types of tumors as analyzed on the Broad institute website. b CDK1 was abnormally upregulated in multiple types of tumors as analyzed on the Oncomine website. c CDK1 was highly expressed in ACC as analyzed via TCGA database. d CDK1 expression was increased with the clinical grade of ACC. e CDK1 expression increased the higher the nodal metastasis status of ACC, compared to non-metastatic ACC. f-h The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis suggested that CDK1 expression was strongly related to the OS, DSS and PFI survival probability of ACC patients. i-k The ROC curve of CDK1 expression and OS, DSS and PFI survival suggested that CDK1 could be useful as a prognostic indicator of ACC.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Differential gene expression and enrichment analysis of overexpressed CDK1 in SW-13 cells. a CDK1 expression was higher in NCI-H295R than in SW-13 cells. b Volcano plot of DEGs between SW-13_CDK1 and SW-13_NC cells. 104 genes were downregulated and 66 genes were overexpressed in the SW-13_CDK1 group, compared to the SW-13_NC group. c Gene ontology enrichment of DEGs suggested that CDK1 participated in cell-cell adhesion, muscle structure development, angiogenesis and cell proliferation. d KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs suggested that CDK1 regulated the cell adhesion molecules, epithelial cell signaling, and cell cycle pathways. e Reactome pathway enrichment of DEGs indicated that CDK1 could play an essential part in GPCR signaling.
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Analysis of blood physiology parameters of control, vehicle- and CurE-treated mice. The following blood physiology functions were assayed: WBC: white blood cell count; RBC: red blood cell count; HGB: hemoglobin; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; RDW: red blood cell volume distribution width; PLT: platelet; LYM: lymphocyte count; MON: monocyte count; NEUT: neutrophil count. The data were shown as mean ± standard deviation. N = 6 for each group, ** P < 0.01 vs. control group.
Additional file 4: Figure S4. Abnormal expressed gene and functional enrichment analysis of SW-13 cells after treatment of CurE. a Volcano map of differential genes of SW-13 cells after treatment of CurE. There were 115 downregulated genes and 274 upregulated genes identified in CurE treated SW-13 cells. b Gene ontology enrichment of DEGs revealed that CurE mainly affected apoptotic signaling pathway, epithelial cell-cell adhesion and angiogenesis pathways. c KEGG pathway enrichment suggested CurE regulated the cell cycle, the synthesis and metabolism of amino acids, cell adhesion molecules, P53 and PPAR signaling pathway, DNA replication, necroptosis and cellular senescence. d Reactome path- way enrichment suggested that CurE participated in the S phase, G2/M checkpoints, MyD88 related pathway, CDK- mediated phosphorylation, antigen processing, proteasome degradation, apoptosis and programmed cell death.
Additional file 5: Figure S5. Overexpression of CDK1 enhanced protein stabilities of UBE2C and AURKA/B. a Expressions of UBE2C and AURKA/B in SW-13_NC and SW-13_CDK1 cells after treatment with CHX (100 umol/L) at 0, 1, 3, 9, 12 h. b Relative expression of UBE2C, AURKA c and AURKB d in SW-13_NC and SW-13_CDK1 cells after treatment with CHX. Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Additional file 6: Figure S6. Silencing the markers of apoptosis or pyrop- tosis could not rescue CurE-mediated cell death. a Transfection efficacy of knockdown caspase 3 expression in SW-13 cells. b Transfection efficacy of knockdown caspase 3 expression in NCI-H295R cells. c Transfection efficacy of knockdown GSDMD expression in SW-13 cells. b
Transfection efficacy of knockdown GSDMD expression in NCI-H295R cells. e Silencing caspase 3 increased necrotic cells triggered by CurE in SW-13 cells. f Silencing caspase 3 increased necrotic cells triggered by CurE in NCI-H295R cells. g Silencing GSDMD increased necrotic cells triggered by CurE in SW-13 cells. h Silencing GSDMD increased necrotic cells triggered by CurE in NCI-H295R cells.
Additional file 7: Figure S7. Knockdown of CDK1 could significantly reverse the inhibitory effect of CurE on ACC cell lines. a Effect of CurE on morphology of CDK1-knockdown and control SW-13 and b NCI-H295R cells. c Effect of CurE on inhibition rate in CDK1-knockdown and control SW-13 and d NCI-H295R cells. e Effect of CurE on cell cycle in CDK1-knock- down and control SW-13 and f NCI-H295R cells. CDK1-knockdown and control cells were treated with 0.3 umol/L CurE for 24 h in SW-13 cells and 1 µmol/L CurE for 24 h in NCI-H295R cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data was presented as mean ± SD. *** P < 0.001 vs. control group.
Additional file 8: Table S1. Information of antibodies used in this research.
Acknowledgements The Fig. 7 was made by Figdraw.
Author contributions
LR: data operation, writing original paper; YY, WL: confirmation, precise analysis; JL, XZ: methodology; SL, HY: project administration; YZ, SZ: software; DD, BG, WF: data curation; GD: providing suggestion; JW: conceptualization, funding acquisition; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7212157), CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (2021-I2M-1-029, 2022-I2M-JB-011), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803584, 81703536), Tech- nology Major Projects for “Major New Drugs Innovation and Development” (2018ZX09711001-005-025, 2018ZX09711001-012).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy and confidentiality reasons but are available from the correspond- ing author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Consent for publication Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Author details
1The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China. 2Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China. 3Depart- ment of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Received: 23 June 2022 Accepted: 16 September 2022 Published online: 02 October 2022
References
1. Else T, Kim AC, Sabolch A, Raymond VM, Kandathil A, Caoili EM, Jolly S, Miller BS, Giordano TJ, Hammer GD. Adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Rev. 2014;35:282-326.
2. Crona J, Beuschlein F. Adrenocortical carcinoma-towards genomics guided clinical care. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15:548-60.
3. Puglisi S, Calabrese A, Basile V, Pia A, Reimondo G, Perotti P, Terzolo M. New perspectives for mitotane treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34: 101415.
4. Pittaway JFH, Guasti L. Pathobiology and genetics of adrenocortical carci- noma. J Mol Endocrinol. 2019;62:R105-19.
5. Prevo R, Pirovano G, Puliyadi R, Herbert KJ, Rodriguez-Berriguete G, O’Docherty A, Greaves W, McKenna WG, Higgins GS. CDK1 inhibition sensitizes normal cells to DNA damage in a cell cycle dependent manner. Cell Cycle. 2018;17:1513-23.
6. O’Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, et al. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pan- creatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1923-9.
7. Wu J, Yuan Y, Long Priel DA, Fink D, Peer CJ, Sissung TM, Su YT, Pang Y, Yu G, Butler MK, et al. Phase I study of zotiraciclib in combination with temozolo- mide for patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3298-306.
8. Izadi S, Nikkhoo A, Hojat-Farsangi M, Namdar A, Azizi G, Mohammadi H, Yousefi M, Jadidi-Niaragh F. CDK1 in breast cancer: implications for thera- nostic potential. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2020;20:758-67.
9. Ravindran Menon D, Luo Y, Arcaroli JJ, Liu S, KrishnanKutty LN, Osborne DG, Li Y, Samson JM, Bagby S, Tan AC, et al. CDK1 Interacts with Sox2 and pro- motes tumor initiation in human melanoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6561-74.
10. Bakir B, Chiarella AM, Pitarresi JR, Rustgi AK. EMT, MET, plasticity, and tumor metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:764-76.
11. Pastushenko I, Blanpain C. EMT transition states during tumor progression and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29:212-26.
12. Brabletz S, Schuhwerk H, Brabletz T, Stemmler MP. Dynamic EMT: a multi- tool for tumor progression. EMBO J. 2021;40: e 108647.
13. Ke B, Tian M, Li J, Liu B, He G. Targeting programmed cell death using small- molecule compounds to improve potential cancer therapy. Med Res Rev. 2016;36:983-1035.
14. Samir P, Malireddi RKS, Kanneganti TD. The PANoptosome: a deadly protein complex driving pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:238.
15. Zheng M, Kanneganti TD. The regulation of the ZBP1-NLRP3 inflam- masome and its implications in pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Immunol Rev. 2020;297:26-38.
16. Kuriakose T, Kanneganti TD. ZBP1: Innate sensor regulating cell death and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:123-34.
17. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W98-102.
18. Gehlenborg N, Noble MS, Getz G, Chin L, Park PJ. Nozzle: a report genera- tion toolkit for data analysis pipelines. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1089-91.
19. Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, Ghosh D, Barrette T, Pandey A, Chinnaiyan AM. ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia. 2004;6:1-6.
20. Chandrashekar DS, Bashel B, Balasubramanya SAH, Creighton CJ, Ponce- Rodriguez I, Chakravarthi B, Varambally S. UALCAN: a portal for facilitat- ing tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia. 2017;19:649-58.
21. Liu X, Zhang Z, Ruan J, Pan Y, Magupalli VG, Wu H, Lieberman J. Inflamma- some-activated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature. 2016;535:153-8.
22. Fang Y, Tian S, Pan Y, Li W, Wang Q, Tang Y, Yu T, Wu X, Shi Y, Ma P, Shu Y. Pyroptosis: a new frontier in cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121: 109595.
23. Liu Z, Gan L, Xu Y, Luo D, Ren Q, Wu S, Sun C. Melatonin alleviates inflamma- some-induced pyroptosis through inhibiting NF-kappaB/GSDMD signal in mice adipose tissue. J Pineal Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12414.
24. Gong Y, Fan Z, Luo G, Yang C, Huang Q, Fan K, Cheng H, Jin K, Ni Q, Yu X, Liu C. The role of necroptosis in cancer biology and therapy. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:100.
25. Banoth B, Tuladhar S, Karki R, Sharma BR, Briard B, Kesavardhana S, Burton A, Kanneganti TD. ZBP1 promotes fungi-induced inflammasome activation and pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). J Biol Chem. 2020;295:18276-83.
26. Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, Baudin E, Berruti A, de Krijger R, Haak HR, Mihai R, Assie G, Terzolo M. European society of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179:G1-46.
27. Jasim S, Habra MA. Management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21:20.
28. Jain M, Zhang L, He M, Zhang YQ, Shen M, Kebebew E. TOP2A is overex- pressed and is a therapeutic target for adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:361-70.
29. Liang R, Weigand I, Lippert J, Kircher S, Altieri B, Steinhauer S, Hantel C, Rost S, Rosenwald A, Kroiss M, et al. Targeted gene expression profile reveals CDK4 as therapeutic target for selected patients with adrenocortical carci- noma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:219.
30. Guo J, Gu Y, Ma X, Zhang L, Li H, Yan Z, Han Y, Xie L, Guo X. Identification of hub genes and pathways in adrenocortical carcinoma by integrated bioinformatic analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:4428-38.
31. Kulshrestha A, Suman S, Ranjan R. Network analysis reveals potential markers for pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:4569-81.
32. Xiao H, Xu D, Chen P, Zeng G, Wang X, Zhang X. Identification of five genes as a potential biomarker for predicting progress and prognosis in adreno- cortical carcinoma. J Cancer. 2018;9:4484-95.
33. Huang YG, Li D, Wang L, Su XM, Tang XB. CENPF/CDK1 signaling pathway enhances the progression of adrenocortical carcinoma by regulating the G2/M-phase cell cycle. J Transl Med. 2022;20:78.
34. Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y, Du J, Wang X, An J, Hu B, Kong L, Di W, Wang W. UBE2C, directly targeted by miR-548e-5p, increases the cellular growth and invasive abilities of cancer cells interacting with the EMT marker protein zinc finger e-box binding homeobox 1/2 in NSCLC. Theranostics. 2019;9:2036-55.
35. Du R, Huang C, Liu K, Li X, Dong Z. Targeting AURKA in cancer: molecular mechanisms and opportunities for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:15.
36. Altieri B, Ronchi CL, Kroiss M, Fassnacht M. Next-generation therapies for adrenocortical carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34: 101434.
37. Yang P, Liu W, Fu R, Ding GB, Amin S, Li Z. Cucurbitacin E chemosensitizes colorectal cancer cells via mitigating TFAP4/Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J Agric Food Chem. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05551.
38. Sun C, Zhang M, Shan X, Zhou X, Yang J, Wang Y, Li-Ling J, Deng Y. Inhibi- tory effect of cucurbitacin E on pancreatic cancer cells growth via STAT3 signaling. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:603-10.
39. Hsu PC, Tian B, Yang YL, Wang YC, Liu S, Urisman A, Yang CT, Xu Z, Jablons DM, You L. Cucurbitacin E inhibits the yes-associated protein signaling pathway and suppresses brain metastasis of human nonsmall cell lung cancer in a murine model. Oncol Rep. 2019;42:697-707.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ready to submit your research? Choose BMC and benefit from:
· fast, convenient online submission
· thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field
· rapid publication on acceptance
· support for research data, including large and complex data types
· gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations
· maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year
At BMC, research is always in progress.
BMC
Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions