A hypothesis-driven approach identifies CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors as candidate drugs for treatments of adrenocortical carcinomas
Djihad Hadjadj1, Su-Jung Kim1, Thomas Denecker1, Laura Ben Driss1, Jean-Charles Cadoret1, Chrystelle Maric1, Giuseppe Baldacci1, Fabien Fauchereau1,2
1Pathologies de la Réplication de l’ADN, Université Paris-Diderot - Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS UMR7592, Institut Jacques-Monod, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France
2ePôle de Génoinformatique, Université Paris-Diderot - Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS UMR7592, Institut Jacques-Monod, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France
Correspondence to: Fabien Fauchereau, Giuseppe Baldacci; email: fabien.fauchereau@ijm.fr, giuseppe.baldacci@ijm.fr
Keywords: cancer, CDK6, adrenocortical, palbociclib, ribociclib
Received: March 31, 2017 Accepted: December 17, 2017 Published: December 26, 2017
Copyright: Hadjadj et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
ABSTRACT
High proliferation rate and high mutation density are both indicators of poor prognosis in adrenocortical carcinomas. We performed a hypothesis-driven association study between clinical features in adrenocortical carcinomas and the expression levels of 136 genes involved in DNA metabolism and G1/S phase transition. In 79 samples downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas portal, high Cyclin Dependent Kinase 6 (CDK6) mRNA levels gave the most significant association with shorter time to relapse and poorer survival of patients. A hierarchical clustering approach assembled most tumors with high levels of CDK6 mRNA into one group. These tumors tend to cumulate mutations activating the Wnt/B-catenin pathway and show reduced MIR506 expression. Actually, the level of MIR506 RNA is inversely correlated with the levels of both CDK6 and CTNNB1 (encoding -catenin). Together these results indicate that high CDK6 expression is found in aggressive tumors with activated Wnt/B-catenin pathway. Thus we tested the impact of Food and Drug Administration-approved CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors, namely palbociclib and ribociclib, on SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells. While both drugs reduced viability and induced senescence in SW-13 cells, only palbociclib was effective on the retinoblastoma protein (pRB)-negative NCI-H295R cells, by inducing apoptosis. In NCI-H295R cells, palbociclib induced an increase of the active form of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3} (GSK3B) responsible for the reduced amount of active B-catenin, and altered the amount of AXIN2 mRNA. Taken together, these data underline the impact of CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors in treating adrenocortical carcinomas.
INTRODUCTION
Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACCs) are rare (annual incidence 0.5 to 2 patients per million individuals) but deadly cancers (the overall five-year survival of patients has been estimated below 35% in most studies) with limited opportunities of treatment [1,2]. In ACCs, indicators of high proliferation rate, such as an ab- normal number of mitoses (>5 mitoses per 50 high power fields) and a high Ki-67 labeling index, consti-
tute potent markers of poor prognosis [3-6]. This tendency has been confirmed by transcriptomic approaches that segregated ACCs into two groups. An overall overexpression of genes associated with cell proliferation has been observed in the group of most aggressive ACCs [7-9]. Abnormal expression of genes involved in DNA metabolism may also contribute to a higher mutation rate and thus to the acquisition of new cellular abilities, such as resistance to drugs, and the ability to relapse and to metastasize. In ACCs, mutation
density has recently been associated with clinicopathological parameters such as overall survival time and time to recurrence [10].
Considering the central role of DNA metabolism in the evolution of cancers, we have tested the association of clinical parameters with the expression levels of 136 genes involved in the G1/S phase transition, DNA replication and response to DNA damage. This study was performed on transcriptomic data of 79 ACC patients shared by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) consortium [10]. The most significant association was obtained with the Cyclin Dependent Kinase 6 (CDK6) gene, whose overexpression is associated with short time before tumor relapse and death of patients. We found that CDK6 mRNA is overexpressed in a group of aggressive ACCs enriched in mutations in genes of the Wnt/B-catenin pathway.
Based on these results, we considered CDK6 inhibitors as potential candidates for therapy of ACCs. Palbociclib (PD-0332991, IBRANCE®, Pfizer), and ribociclib (LEE011, Kisqali®, Novartis) are both CDK4 and CDK6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Palbociclib is efficient in combination with letrozole (Femara®, Novartis) or fulvestrant (FASLODEX®, AstraZeneca) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)-advanced breast cancers. It has recently been approved in the United States of America and the European Union in these combinations [11-14]. Ribociclib, in combination with letrozole, was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a frontline treatment for HR+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-)-advanced or metastatic breast cancers [15,16]. We thus characterized the impacts of these two FDA- approved CDK4/6 inhibitors on the cell cycle and survival of SW-13 and NCI-H295R cell lines as a first step to test their potential therapeutic properties against ACCs.
RESULTS
A hierarchical clustering of G1/S transition and DNA replication / repair genes identifies four transcriptional clusters
As a first step of our study on transcriptomic data related to the G1/S transition and DNA replication genes in ACCs, we established a list of 136 genes involved in these processes, based on ontology annotations in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [17] and bibliographic data (Supplementary Table 1). These genes could be classified into six groups based on their biological functions, namely G1/S transition, DNA polymerases, DNA replication, S phase checkpoint, stalled replication
fork restart / double strand break repair, and dNTP synthesis. We added the expression levels of the Marker of Proliferation Ki-67 (MKI67) gene, as its expression is a keystone marker of proliferation widely used in adrenal cancer prognosis. For these 137 genes (including MKI67), RNAseq data of ACCs from 79 patients were then downloaded from the TCGA portal.
To identify clusters of co-expressed genes, we first estimated the Pearson correlation coefficient of these 137 genes with each other, based on mRNA levels (Supplementary Figure 1). We then performed a hierar- chical clustering of genes, in which the dissimilarity between gene clusters was calculated with the Pearson correlation values. Genes clustered into one group tended to have correlated mRNA levels. Hierarchical clustering produced four clusters of genes. Clusters 3 and 4 contain 56 (including MKI67) and 33 genes, respectively. The Pearson correlation test showed that the expression levels of each of the 55 genes of cluster 3 and 28 genes of cluster 4 (out of 33) are significantly correlated with the expression of MKI67 and are associated with this classical marker of proliferation rate (Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1). These 83 genes are implicated in the six afore- mentioned functional processes. In particular, they include the genes encoding the replicative DNA poly- merases a, 8 and &, with the exception of the POLD4 gene, which encodes the p12 accessory subunit of polymerase 8. Clusters 1 and 2 contain 23 and 25 genes, respectively. While the expression values in ACCs of 40 genes showed no significant correlation with MKI67, 9 genes in cluster 1 were inversely correlated with this proliferation marker. Among these is POLD4. The other inversely correlated genes include genes of negative cell cycle regulators (CDKN1C, CCND2 and RBL2) and DNA repair genes (ATM, RAD50, MCM9, RMI1 and TOP3A).
CDK6 expression shows significant prognostic value in ACCs
We then studied the association of the expression of the 137 genes with the overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS) of patients (Supplementary Table 1). Association was tested using the Log-rank test, which is routinely used to compare survival distribu- tions of two groups of patients. Among the genes tested, the expression level of 114 genes was significantly correlated with OS, and that of 68 genes with RFS. Since proliferation is widely used in medical oncology, we focused our attention on the 28 genes associated with OS and/or RFS, but unrelated to MKI67 (Table 1). Higher mRNA levels of genes encoding translesion DNA polymerases, namely POLB, POLL, REV1 and REV3L, and lower expression of POLK, indicated poor
prognosis (Table 1). Increased expression associated with poor prognosis was also observed for genes involved in E2F-dependent G1/S transition (CDK6, CCND1, E2F3-5 and TFDP2), in DNA replication initiation (ORC2L, ORC4L and ORC5L), in S phase checkpoint (TIPIN, TP53) and stalled fork restart and double-strand break repair (SMARCAL1 and MUS81). In contrast, associated with poor prognosis, we observed reduced gene expression of inhibitors of the E2F pathway (CDKN2B, HDAC1, RB1), of genes involved in DNA replication (GINS3 and TOP1), in S phase checkpoint (RAD17, NBN and TP53BP1), and in dNTP synthesis (RRM2B). The gene with the most significant Log-rank test for RFS is CDK6 (cutoff value > 10.63, n=25 out of 79 patients, adjusted p value = 6,97 x 106). Its expression is also significantly associated with OS (cutoff value > 10.74, n=24 out
of 79 patients, adjusted p value = 4.05 x 10-5). CDK6 and 9 other genes unrelated to proliferation, namely E2F3, E2F5, ORC2L, ORC4L, ORC5L, CDKN2B, POLG2, REV3L and SMARCAL1, belong to the expression cluster 2 (Supplementary Figure 1) and thus have similar expression profiles in ACC patients. The Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrate a shorter time of OS and RFS of patients associated with high CDK6 expression (Figure 1). We confirmed the association between the CDK6 transcription level and shorter time to relapse and death using the Log-rank test on previously published data from a French cohort [18]. In this sample, patients with levels higher than the cutoff values again showed shorter times to relapse (p value = 0.041, cutoff value > 5.067, n=38 out of 44 patients) and death (p value = 1.51 x 10-6, cutoff value > 6.027, n=19 out of 44 patients).
| Correlation with MKI-67 | Relapse Free survival | Overall Survival | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Cellular process | coef. Correl. | P-value | Risk group | Cutoff | Percentile | P- value | Adj. P-val. | Risk group | Cutoff | Percentile | P- value | Adj. P- val. |
| DNA polymerases | |||||||||||||
| POLB | Replication / repair | 0.0238 | 0.8268 | - | 7.692 | 9.3 | 0.1461 | 0.1629 | High | 8.705 | 77.2 | 0.0010 | 0.0018 |
| POLG2 | Mitochondrial DNA replication | 0.1385 | 0.201 | High | 7.394 | 88.9 | 0.0058 | 0.0234 | Low | 7.27 | 87.3 | 0.0240 | 0.0303 |
| POLL | Replication / repair | -0.06111 | 0.5738 | High | 9.842 | 81.5 | 0.0128 | 0.0352 | - | 9.327 | 45.6 | 0.1071 | 0.1165 |
| REV3L | Translesion DNA synthesis | 0.149 | 0.1685 | - | 8.224 | 29.6 | 0.1252 | 0.1408 | High | 9.295 | 86.1 | 0.0024 | 0.0039 |
| REV1 | Translesion DNA synthesis | 0.2021 | 0.06062 | High | 9.479 | 44.4 | 0.0122 | 0.0352 | High | 10.22 | 77.2 | 7.64E- 06 | 1.89E-05 |
| POLK | Translesion DNA synthesis | -0.1658 | 0.125 | Low | 9.145 | 29.6 | 0.0008 | 0.0075 | Low | 8.899 | 26.6 | 1.26E- 05 | 2.90E-05 |
| G1/S checkpoint | |||||||||||||
| CDK6 | CDK and their regulators | 0.1239 | 0.2529 | High | 10.63 | 79.6 | 5.12E- 08 | 6.97E- 06 | High | 10.74 | 69.6 | 1.79E- 05 | 4.05E-05 |
| CDKN2B | CDK and their regulators | 0.1209 | 0.2645 | Low | 7.09 | 29.6 | 0.0031 | 0.0169 | High | 8.264 | 75.9 | 0.0025 | 0.0039 |
| CCND1 | CDK and their regulators | 0.02788 | 0.7976 | - | 12.53 | 87.0 | 0.0266 | 0.0510 | High | 12.66 | 81.0 | 0.0038 | 0.0056 |
| HDAC1 | pRB pathway | 0.1997 | 0.06391 | Low | 11.03 | 48.1 | 0.0164 | 0.0399 | Low | 10.31 | 12.7 | 0.0102 | 0.0140 |
| RB1 | pRB pathway | -0.1955 | 0.06975 | Low | 9.334 | 13.0 | 0.0076 | 0.0285 | - | 9.899 | 29.1 | 0.0556 | 0.0652 |
| E2F3 | pRB pathway | 0.1764 | 0.1024 | High | 9.201 | 87.0 | 0.0130 | 0.0352 | - | 7.804 | 11.4 | 0.1264 | 0.1364 |
| E2F4 | pRB pathway | 0.1165 | 0.2827 | Low | 10.96 | 61.1 | 0.0217 | 0.0440 | - | 10.77 | 40.5 | 0.1294 | 0.1375 |
| E2F5 | pRB pathway | 0.08457 | 0.436 | High | 5.532 | 20.4 | 0.0411 | 0.0636 | High | 7.213 | 84.8 | 0.0107 | 0.0146 |
| TFDP2 | pRB pathway | - 0.007805 | 0.9428 | High | 8.354 | 72.2 | 0.0049 | 0.0209 | - | 7.35 | 13.9 | 0.1284 | 0.1375 |
| DNA replication | |||||||||||||
| ORC2L | Pre-replication complex | 0.137 | 0.2056 | High | 8.245 | 77.8 | 0.0040 | 0.0190 | High | 8.577 | 84.8 | 2.69E- 05 | 5.91E-05 |
| ORC4L | Pre-replication complex | -0.05241 | 0.6296 | High | 8.576 | 29.6 | 0.0104 | 0.0352 | - | 9.099 | 75.9 | 0.0518 | 0.0612 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORC5L | Pre-replication complex | 0.1365 | 0.2076 | - | 8.235 | 16.7 | 0.2891 | 0.2912 | High | 9.51 | 88.6 | 0.0043 | 0.0063 |
| GINS3 | Initiation of DNA replication | 0.01906 | 0.8609 | - | 9.355 | 57.4 | 0.0819 | 0.1032 | Low | 8.902 | 41.8 | 0.0024 | 0.0038 |
| TOP1 | Topoisomerase | -0.03081 | 0.7769 | Low | 10.86 | 25.9 | 0.0090 | 0.0314 | Low | 10.55 | 19.0 | 0.0146 | 0.0195 |
| S phase checkpoint | |||||||||||||
| RAD17 | ATR + Rad17- 9-1-1 DNA damage sensors | -0.132 | 0.2229 | - | 9.195 | 25.9 | 0.0477 | 0.0684 | Low | 9.471 | 49.4 | 0.0005 | 0.0008 |
| NBN | ATM - MRN DNA damage sensors | -0.04222 | 0.6977 | Low | 9.129 | 9.3 | 0.0034 | 0.0179 | Low | 10.39 | 79.7 | 0.0175 | 0.0225 |
| TIPIN | ATM/ATR pathways mediators | 0.1816 | 0.09256 | - | 5.981 | 40.7 | 0.2053 | 0.2181 | High | 6.53 | 70.9 | 0.0054 | 0.0077 |
| TP53 | ATM and ATR pathways effector | -0.06086 | 0.5754 | High | 10.02 | 79.6 | 0.0002 | 0.0040 | High | 10.13 | 84.8 | 0.0019 | 0.0032 |
| TP53BP1 | ATM and ATR pathways effector | -0.09276 | 0.3927 | - | 9.333 | 11.1 | 0.1691 | 0.1855 | Low | 10.16 | 57.0 | 0.0168 | 0.0217 |
| Stalled forks restart by remodeling / DSB repair | |||||||||||||
| SMARCAL1 | Helicase | 0.146 | 0.1773 | High | 8.843 | 35.2 | 0.0205 | 0.0428 | High | 9.37 | 81.0 | 0.0152 | 0.0200 |
| MUS81 | Holliday junction resolution | 0.1526 | 0.1582 | High | 8.886 | 66.7 | 0.0834 | 0.1040 | High | 8.951 | 59.5 | 4.94E- 06 | 1.27E- 05 |
| dNTP synthesis | |||||||||||||
| RRM2B | Ribonucleotide reductase | -0.1183 | 0.2751 | 10.89 | 70.4 | 0.0296 | 0.0523 | Low | 9.512 | 17.8 | 0.0004 | 0.0007 |
RNAseq and clinical data of n=54 and n=79 ACC samples were downloaded from the TCGA website and used for the Log-rank correlation tests for RFS and OS, respectively. The Log-rank test was used to compare survival distribution of two groups of patients, considering that their gene expression values were higher or lower than a cutoff. For each gene, a succession of Log-rank tests was performed with all possible cutoff values, given gene expression levels in tumors. The cutoff value chosen to segregate the “high” and “low” expression groups of patients was the one that maximized the significance of Log-rank tests. The percentile is the proportion of individuals below the cutoff value. “Adj. P-val.” are the p values of the Log-rank tests that have been adjusted following the Benjamini Hochberg method (in bold when significant). Coeff. correl. is the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient estimated between the expression level of each gene with MKI67. The risk group is given when the association with RFS and/or OS was significant. High and Low risk groups indicate the group with the worst prognosis, based on their expression level, higher or lower than the cutoff, respectively.
Molecular and clinical features of patients with high expression of CDK6
Since our cell cycle / DNA metabolism approach highlighted the association of high CDK6 expression with short times to relapse and death, we looked for other clinical and molecular features shared by patients
showing CDK6 overexpression. Hierarchical clustering based on mRNA levels of the 500 most variant genes in ACCs led to the constitution of clusters designated 1, 2 and 3. These clusters as a whole reflect the mRNA- based classification (Clusters of Clusters) recently published by TCGA [10] (Figure 2a). Cluster 2 includes 23 out of the 25 “CDK6-high” samples. The average
expression level of CDK6 is higher in cluster 2 than in cluster 1 or 3 (cluster 2 vs 1, p value = 1.75 x 10-20, cluster 2 vs 3, p value =4.08 x 10-28) (Figure 2b). Cluster 2 tumors contain the majority of Cluster 1A (C1A) previously classified samples with a high production of steroids. A clinical feature significantly associated with the CDK6 mRNA level is the synthesis of hormones, that are known to be an indication of poor prognosis in ACC patients [19] (Table 2). Cluster 2 also includes the majority of mutations and copy number variations that activate the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway. The microRNA-based clustering recently published by TCGA has led to a new classification in six groups [10]. Since the data involved microRNA506 (MIR506) in the regulation of both CDK6 and CTNNB1 (encoding ß-catenin), we analyzed its expression level in the 79 ACC samples. The expression of microRNA 506 was significantly lower in cluster 2 compared to clusters 1 and 3 (cluster 2 vs 1, p value = 6.55 x 10-11, cluster 2 vs 3, p value = 9.49 x 10-18) (Figure 2b). Correlation analyses revealed an inversed ratio between the CDK6 and MIR506 expression levels (Figure 2c, test for correlation based on Pearson’s product moment coefficient, coefficient = - 0.442, p value = 4.50 x 10-3). The anti-correlation between MIR506 and CTNNB1 RNAs has been previously described by TCGA [10]. Thus, a low MIR506 expression level could contribute to higher levels of both CDK6 and CTNNB1 mRNAs in ACCs.
Palbociclib and ribociclib lower cell viability of the SW-13 and NCI-H295R cell lines
Palbociclib and ribociclib inhibit CDK4/6 and are used for the treatment of breast cancer [11,12,15,16]. We tested the effects on cell viability of CDK4/6 inhibitors either with or without mitotane, a well-known adreno- lytic drug that is currently used to treat ACCs. Viability was measured using SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells.
Mitotane was first tested alone. It decreased SW-13 and NCI-H295R viability with an IC50 (concentration needed to reduce viability to 50%) of 68.38 µM and 33.16 µM, respectively (Figure 3a). As previously shown, SW-13 cells are less sensitive to mitotane than NCI-H295R cells [20]. We then combined increasing concentrations of mitotane with either 1 uM of palbociclib or 1 uM of ribo- ciclib on SW-13 and 10 uM of palbociclib or ribociclib on NCI-H295R cells (concentration of ribociclib or palbociclib inducing a 20% reduction of viability when they are used alone). In SW-13 cells, both drugs showed an additive effect with mitotane, with a 50% combination index of 0.997 for mitotane with palbociclib and of 1.043 for mitotane with ribociclib (Figure 3a). However, in NCI-H295R cells, mitotane showed an additive effect only with palbociclib with a combination index of 1.021 (Figure 3a). Mitotane combined with ribociclib showed no difference on cell viability compared to the effect of mitotane alone (Figure 3a).
1.0
1.0
0.8
(n=54)
0.8
Relapse free survival
(n=55)
0.6
Overall survival
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
(n=25)
0.2
- (n=24)
< 10.63
< 10.74
0.0
> 10.63
log-rank p-value = 6.97e-06
0.0
> 10.74
log-rank p-value = 4.05e-05
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Analysis time (days)
Analysis time (days)
a
b
CDK6 expression
CTNNB1 expression
p= 1.11 x 10-17
p= 4.08 x 10-28
5
p= 1.75 x 10-2
Gene expression
2
0
.
5
mRNA expression
4
2
0
cluster 1
cluster 2
cluster 3
p= 1.11 x 10-17
5
p= 8.75 x 10”
p= 1.87 × 10-20
Gene expression
2
5
0
cluster 1
cluster 2
cluster 3
Molecular features
Clusters of clusters C1A / C1B
Expression subtype Copy Number subtype MiRNA subtype mir-506 expression CTNNB1 expression Wnt/ß-catenin TP53
C
Correlation between mir-506 and CDK6 expressions
Clinical features symbols (top)
?
cor = - 0.442
Death, recurrence and hormone secretion
☒ Yes
☐ No
☐ Unknown
Gender
☐ Female
☒ Male
Clinical stage ☐ 1
☐ 2
☒
☐ Unknown
CDK6 expression
High
☐ Low
Molecular features symbols (bottom)
Clusters of clusters
☒ CoC I
☐ CoC II
☐ CoC III ☐ Unknown
C1A / C1B
☒ C1A
☐ C1B
:
Expression subtype
☒ Steroid-low + prolif
☒ Steroid-low
☒ Steroid-high + prolif
☒ Steroid-high
Copy Number subtype ☒ Chromosomal
☐ Noisy
☒ Quiet
☐ Unknown
₼
MiRNA subtype
☒ 1
☒ 2
☒ 3
☒ 4
☐ 5
☒ 6
Mutations in Wnt/ß-catenin pathway and TP53 ☐ ☐ Unknown No ☒ Yes
0.80
11.50
CTNNB1 expression (Log2 scale)
-
2
4
6
8
10
mir-506 expression
0
-2
-4
mir-506 expression
p= 6.89 x 10-14
5
p= 9.49 x 10-18
p= 6.55 x 10-11
Gene expression
0
5
0
cluster 1
cluster 2
cluster 3
P-value = 4.50 10°
~
=
CDK6 expression
mir-506 expression (Log2 scale)
₥
11.13
15.94
Clinical features
Death Recurrence Gender Clinical stage Hormones CDK6 expresion
cluster 1
cluster 2
cluster 3
☒ 3
4
| High CDK6 | Low CDK6 | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 47.6 [40.2;55.0] | 46.2 [42.2;50.2] | 0.747 |
| Tumor Size | 139 [108;169] | 125 [96;154] | 0.531 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 6 | 25 | 0.132 |
| Female | 18 | 30 | |
| Hormonal Secretion | |||
| Yes | 19 | 29 | 0.038 |
| No | 4 | 22 | |
| Laterality | |||
| Right | 9 | 26 | 0.468 |
| Left | 15 | 29 | |
| Clinical stage | |||
| I | 0 | 9 | 0.056 |
| II | 10 | 26 | |
| III | 7 | 9 | |
| IV | 7 | 8 | |
| Weiss score | |||
| <4 | 4 | 10 | 0.491 |
| 4-5 | 7 | 9 | |
| 6-7 | 3 | 13 | |
| >7 | 5 | 9 | |
| Recurrence | |||
| Yes | 7 | 7 | 6.97 x 10-6 |
| No | 2 | 37 | |
| Time to recurrence | 689 [ 297;1080] | 1435 [1117;1753] | |
| Death | |||
| Yes | 16 | 10 | 4.05 x 10-5 |
| No | 8 | 42 | |
| Time to death | 1059 [746;1372] | 1495 [1210;1779] |
The “High” and “Low” CDK6 expression groups are based on the results of the Log-rank test for relapse-free survival. Fisher’s exact test was used to test the independence of discrete clinical features (gender, hormonal secretion, laterality and clinical stage) from expression level. Independence was rejected only for hormonal secretion, with an enrichment of hormone secretion among the “High” CDK6 expression group (true odds ratio = 3.5454, 95% confidence interval [0.981;16.385]). p values given for Recurrence and Death traits are those of the Log-rank test. Time to recurrence and death are the average values estimated from “High” CDK6 and “Low” CDK6 groups.
The effects of palbociclib and ribociclib alone on both the SW-13 and NCI-H295R cell lines were also tested. Both drugs decreased cell viability in the SW-13 cell line, with an IC50 = 15.50 µM for palbociclib and an IC50 = 19.08 UM for ribociclib (Figure 3b). In NCI- H295R cells only palbociclib had an effect on cell viability with an IC50 = 14.06 uM (Figure 3b). After treatment with 20 uM palbociclib cell viability was estimated to be close to 0%. Hence, palbociclib is the only drug active on both cancer cell lines and it strongly affects cell viability of NCI-H295R cells.
Palbociclib induces cell cycle arrest and senescence in SW-13 and NCI-H295R cell lines
To better characterize the effects of the two CDK4/6 inhibitors on the viability of the SW-13 and NCI- H295R cells, the cell cycle of both cell lines upon treatment with either palbociclib or ribociclib was investigated. In SW-13 cells, 1 and 5 uM of both inhibi- tors induced cell cycle arrest, with a smaller proportion of cells in the S phase and an increased proportion of cells in the G1 and G2 phases, when compared with
mock-treated cells (Figure 4a and Supplementary Figure 2a). The cycle of NCI-H295R cells was also affected by drug treatments (Figure 4a and Supplementary Figure 2a). 10 uM Palbociclib increased the proportion of cells in G2 phase, whereas 10 uM ribociclib increased the proportion of cells in S phase.
We tested whether reduced cell viability was associated with senescence. In SW-13 cells treated with palbociclib or ribociclib, we observed a significant increase in the percentage of cells harboring ß-galacto- sidase activity, an indicator of senescence (Figure 4b and Supplementary Figure 2b). Both treatments also induced higher cell granularity and increased cell size in flow cytometry analyses (Figures 4c and d).
Induction of vesicle formation and increased flatness were also observed with bright-field microscopy (Figure 4g). Reversibility of the cell cycle arrest was tested by clonogenic assay. Ribociclib (1 and 5 uM, p values = 0.001 and 0.011, respectively), and palbociclib (1 and 5 uM, p values = 0.022 and 0.6 x 10-3, respectively) significantly decreased the ability of SW-13 to form clones, with clonogenic ability close to 0 after treatment with 5 uM palbociclib (Figures 4e and f). Taken together, these observations indicate induction of senescence in SW-13 cells after treatment with either palbociclib or ribociclib. In NCI-H295R cells, only palbociclib induced a significant increase of ß-galacto- sidase activity (Figure 4b) when compared to mock- treated cells. In contrast with our observations using
a
110 %
100 %
SW13
Mitotane
Mitotane + Ribociclib (1 μM)
Cell viability (reported to mock)
90 %
Mitotane + Palbociclib (1 µM)
80 %
70 %
60 %
50 %
40 %
30 %
20 %
10 %
0 %
1 μM
5 µM
10 μΜ
20 μΜ
30 μΜ
33 μΜ
36 μΜ
40 μΜ
50 μΜ
60 μΜ
70 μΜ
80 μΜ
90 μΜ
100 μΜ
Mitotane concentration
110 %
100 %
NCI-H295R
Mitotane
90 %
Mitotane + Ribociclib (10 µM)
Cell viability (reported to mock)
Mitotane + Palbociclib (10 μM)
80 %
70 %
60 %
50 %
40 9 %
30 %
20 %
10 %
0 %
1 μM
5 μΜ
10 μΜ
20 μΜ
30 μΜ
33 μΜ
36 μΜ
40 μΜ
50 μΜ
60 μΜ
70 μΜ
80 μΜ
90 μΜ
100 μΜ
b
Mitotane concentration
110 %
SW13
Ribociclib
110 %
NCI-H295R
Ribociclib
100 %
Palbociclib
100 %
Palbociclib
Cell viability (reported to mock)
90 %
*
*
*
*
Cell viability (reported to mock)
90 %
80 %
80 %
70 %
70
60
%
60 %
50 %
50 %
40 %
40 %
30 %
30 %
20 %
20 %
10 %
10 %
0 %
0.05μΜ
0.10μM
0.50μM
1.00μΜ
5.00μM
10.00μM
15.00μΜ
20.00μΜ
0 %
0.05μM
0.10μM
0.50μΜ
1.00μΜ
5.00μΜ
10.00μM
15.00µM
20.00μΜ
Drug concentration
Drug concentration
a
b
=G1
S
=G2
=G1
S
=G2
6
**
**
**
**
**
**
Cell cycle proportions %
ß-galactosidase positive cells (Fold change)
**
**
100%
**
I
I
4
80%
1
60%
40%
2
20%
0%
1μΜ
5μ.Μ
1μ.Μ
5uM
10μΜ
10μΜ
0
1μ.Μ
5μΜ
1μ.Μ
5μΜ
5uM
10μΜ
5μΜ
10μΜ
Eth
Palbociclib
DMSO
Ribociclib
Eth
Palbociclib
DMSO
Ribociclib
Mock
Palbociclib
Ribocliclib
Mock
Palbociclib
Ribociclib
SW13
NCI-H295R
SW13
NCI-H295R
C
d
DMSO
DMSO
Ethanol
1500
[Ribociclib]
1500
Ethanol
[Ribociclib]
[Palbociclib]
[Palbociclib]
Number of cells
Number of cells
1000
ㅎ1000
500
500
0
0
0
20K
40K
60K
0
20K
40K
60K
0
20K
40K
60K
0
20K
40K
60K
Granularity (SSline :: SS)
Granularity (SSline :: SS)
Cell size (FSline :: FS)
Cell size (FSline :: FS)
SW13
NCI-H295R
SW13
NCI-H295R
e
f
100%
120%
Cell colony percentage (reported to mock)
Cell colony percentage (reported to mock)
100%
Ethanol
DMSO
Ethanol
DMSO
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
[Palbociclib] = 1µM
[Ribociclib] = 1µM
[Palbociclib] = 5uM
[Ribociclib] = 5uM
40%
20%
20%
0%
0
1μΜ
5uM
1μΜ
5μ.Μ
5μ.Μ
10μΜ
5μ.Μ
10μΜ
[Palbociclib] = 5μ.Μ
[Ribociclib] = 5uM
[Palbociclib] = 10μM
[Ribociclib] = 10μM
Mock
Palbociclib
Ribocliclib
Mock
Palbociclib
Ribociclib
SW13
NCI-H295R
SW13
NCI-H295R
g
h
50 μm
50 μm
50 pm
50 pm
DMSO
Ethanol
DMSO
Ethanol
50 pm
50 μm
50 pm
50 um
[Ribociclib] = 5μ.Μ
[Palbociclib] = 5μ.Μ
[Ribociclib] = 10μ.Μ
[Palbociclib] = 10μ.Μ
SW13
NCI-H295R
| Cell lines | SW13 | NCI-H295R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds | Palbociclib | Ribociclib | Palbociclib | Ribociclib |
| Senescence phenotype | +++ | +++ | + | |
| Cell cycle arrest | +++ | +++ | + | |
| ß-galactosidase activity | +++ | +++ | + | |
| Granularity and size shifts | +++ | +++ | + | |
| Irreversibility | +++ | ++ | + | |
| Flatness and vesicles | +++ | +++ | + | |
Figure 4. Senescence features induced by ribociclib and palbociclib. (a) Cumulative bar chart showing the proportion of SW-13 and NCI-H295R treated cells in G1, S and G2/M cell cycle phases. (b) ß-galactosidase activity is used as marker of senescence. The number of cells with ß-galactosidase activity after treatment with ribociclib or palbociclib was counted and related to the number of cells
with ß-galactosidase activity after treatment with the vehicle only (DMSO or ethanol, respectively). Mean ratio and standard deviation were estimated from three independent experiments. (c) Flow cytometry analyses showing granularity of SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells treated with either palbociclib or ribociclib. Granularity is estimated by measuring the Side Scatter values (on the X-axis). (d) Flow cytometry analyses showing cell size of SW-13 and NCI-H295R treated with either palbociclib or ribociclib. Cell size is estimated by measuring the Side Scatter values (on the X-axis). (e) Colonies formed by SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells after coloring with crystal violet during the clonogenic assay. (f) The number of cell colonies formed after treatment with ribociclib or palbociclib was counted and related to the number of colonies formed after treatment with the vehicle only (DMSO or ethanol, respectively). The mean and standard deviation of percentage of colonies (compared to mock treatment) were estimated with three independent experiments. (g) Images in phase contrast showing the change of cell morphology of SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells upon treatment with either palbociclib or ribociclib. (h) Table summarizing the main aspects of senescence in both cell lines when treated with either palbociclib or ribociclib. For (b) and (f), *P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
SW-13 cells, no marked increase of cell size was detected in NCI-H295R cells treated with either palbociclib or ribociclib (Figure 4d). Only a slight shift of cellular granularity was observed when NCI-H295R cells were treated with palbociclib, but not with ribo- ciclib (Figure 4c). Finally, only 10 uM palbociclib induced a significant irreversibility of cell cycle arrest, as tested by clonogenic assay (p value = 0.013). Thus, NCI-H295R cells treated with palbociclib show some features of senescence, but less pronounced than SW-13 cells (Figure 4h).
Since ribociclib and palbociclib inhibit CDK4/6, they could impair the phosphorylation of the Retinoblastoma protein pRB, a crucial step in the G1/S transition. Consequently, we evaluated the levels of CDK4, CDK6, pRB and phosphorylated-pRb (Phospho-Rb) in such drug-treated cells (Figure 5a). In SW-13 cells, the amount of both CDK4 and CDK6 proteins increased after treatment with palbociclib or ribociclib. Such treatments also significantly lowered the amounts of both Phospho-Rb and pRB (Figures 5a and b). These
experiments thus show that CDK4/6 inhibition following palbociclib or ribociclib treatment reduces the amount of Phospho-RB in SW-13 cells, and is associat- ed with a senescence-like phenotype. pRB was not detected in NCI-H295R protein extracts (Figure 5a), which is consistent with the fact that this cell line carries a homozygous deletion of the RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1) gene (COSMIC mutation ID: 19554, c.862_2787del1926) [21]. This deletion could possibly hamper the action of CDK4/6 inhibitors on this cell line, in which only a slight senescence-like phenotype was observed.
Palbociclib targets the Wnt/B-catenin pathway and induces apoptosis in NCI-H295R cells
Since palbociclib induced a significant decrease of viability of pRB negative NCI-H295R cells (Figure 3b), we evaluated its pro-apoptotic activity. SW-13 cells treated with either palbociclib or ribociclib showed no detectable apoptotic activity (Figure 6a). In NCI-H295R cells, an increase of apoptosis was detected after treat-
a
Phospho- Rb
b
**
*
**
**
*
*
a-tubulin
100%
100%
Relative Phospho-Rb quantity
*
pRb
80%
Relative pRb quantity
80%
a-tubulin
60%
60%
CDK6
40%
40%
CDK4
20%
20%
I
1μΜ
5μΜ
1μΜ 5μΜ
1μΜ 5μΜ Ribociclib
1μΜ 5μΜ
DMSO
Ribociclib
Eth
Palbociclib
DMSO
Eth
Palbociclib
0%
0%
NCI-H295R
Mock
1μM
5μΜ
1uM
Ribociclib
5M
Palbociclib
1μM
SW13
Mock
5μΜ
1μΜ
Ribociclib
5μΜ
Palbociclib
ment with 20 uM palbociclib, but not with ribociclib (Figure 6a). This effect, specific of palbociclib, might be explained by the larger spectrum of kinases that it targets, compared with ribociclib. Additional palbo- ciclib targets include GSK3B and its regulator AKT
serine/threonine kinase [22]. Thus, the impact of palbociclib and ribociclib on the phosphorylation of GSK3B, in the SW-13 and NCI-H295R cell lines was also tested (Figures 6b and c). In SW-13 cells, only palbociclib reduced the ratio of Serine9-phosphorylat-
a
b
5
5
*
Active-ß- catenin
*
1
Fold change apoptosis
4
4
Fold change apoptosis
ß-catenin
3
PhosphoSel
9-GSK3-ß
2
GSK3-ß
1
I
I
1
GAPDH
0
0
1μM
5μΜ
1µM
5μ.Μ
15μΜ 20μΜ 15μΜ 20μM
1μΜ 5μ.Μ
1μΜ 5μ.Μ
1uM 5UM
1μΜ
5μ.Μ
Mock
Ribociclib
SW13
Palbociclib
Mock
Ribociclib
NCI-H295R
Palbociclib
DMSO Ribociclib
Eth
Palbociclib
DMSO Ribociclib
Eth
Palbociclib
C
P-GSK3B / GSK3ß-total
P-GSK3B / GSK3ß-total
Active-B-catenin / B-catenin total O
SW13
NCI-H295R
**
**
*
**
**
100%
Active-ß-catenin / @-catenin total
*
*
120%
*
*
80%
150%
120%
100%
100%
80%
60%
100%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
50%
40%
20%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1μ.Μ 5μ.Μ 1μ.Μ 5μ.Μ
5μΜ 10μΜ 5μ.Μ 10μΜ
1μ.Μ
5μ.Μ
1μ.Μ
5μ.Μ
5μ.Μ 10μΜ
5μ.Μ
Mock Ribociclib Palbociclib SW13
Mock Ribociclib Palbociclib NCI-H295R
Mock
Ribociclib
SW13
Palbociclib
10µM
Mock
Ribociclib
NCI-H295R
Palbociclib
e
f
Fold change AXIN2 mRNA
4
Fold change AXIN2 mRNA
4
Relative secretion of cortisol (% of control)
140%
24h
120%
3
3
48h
*
100%
2
2
80%
1
1
60%
0
0
*
5μ.Μ
5μ.Μ
10μΜ
10μΜ
40%
Mock
Ribociclib
Palbociclib
20%
Mock
Ribociclib
Palbociclib
0%
5μΜ
SW13
NCI-H295R
Ribociclib
10μΜ
Ribociclib
1μ.Μ
Palbociclib
5μ.Μ
Palbociclib
10μM
Palbociclib
100μΜ PNŮ
ed-GSK3ß (inactive form) to total GSK3B (inactive pGSK3฿ / total pGSK3B) (Figures 6b and c). In NCI- H295R cells, 5 and 10 uM palbociclib significantly reduced the inactive pGSK3B / total pGSK3ß ratio (Figures 6b and c). Ribociclib showed effects opposite to palbociclib, as it increased this ratio. GSK3ß was previously shown to phosphorylate ß-catenin and consecutively induce its degradation by proteasome. Since loss of ß-catenin-dependent transcription was associated with apoptosis in NCI-H295R cells [23], the effects of palbociclib and ribociclib on the amount of ß- catenin and on the level of AXIN2 transcripts (a ß- catenin-dependent transcription target) were examined (Figures 6b, 6d and 6e). Ribociclib did not significantly modify the amount of ß-catenin in SW-13 and NCI- H295R cells. Nevertheless, the expression of AXIN2 was significantly altered in both cell lines, through ß- catenin-independent regulations. On the con-trary, palbociclib significantly lowered the amount of ß- catenin in both cell lines. Palbociclib treatment also increased the level of AXIN2 transcripts, as expected after inhibition of ß-catenin-dependent transcription [23].
A previous analysis showed that apoptosis induced by PNU-74654 (an inhibitor of the T cell factor (Tcf)/B- catenin complex) was preceded by reduction of steroid secretion. We assayed cortisol concentration in the supernatant of NCI-H295R cells (Figure 6f) treated with either ribociclib (5 or 10 uM) or palbociclib (1, 5 or 10 uM). Assays were performed at the times of treatments that precede apoptosis (24 h and 48 h). PNU-74654 (100 uM) was used as a positive control, as this inhibi-tor of Tef/B-catenin interaction effectively reduced secretion of cortisol and other steroids by NCI-H295R cells [23]. Actually, neither ribociclib nor palbociclib decreased cortisol secretion at concentrations and time-points tested (Figure 6f). Yet, 100 uM PNU-74654 decreased cortisol production by 80% after 24 h treatment (p value = 0.14) and by 72% after 48 h treatment (p value = 6.7 x 104). These effects of PNU-74654 (Figure 6f) are comparable to those previously observed [23]. Thus, Palbociclib- induced apoptosis of NCI-H295R cells is not preceded by a reduction of cortisol secretion.
Together, these results show that palbociclib-induced apoptosis is associated with a remarkable reduction of the amount of ß-catenin and alters ß-catenin-dependent transcription. Treatment with palbociclib could have potential benefits for the treatment of ACCs with an activated Wnt/B-catenin pathway.
DISCUSSION
In this study we first classified 136 genes (Supplementary Table 1) involved in DNA replication/
repair into four groups, according to their mRNA levels. A set of 83 genes overlapping clusters 3 and 4 showed a significant correlation with MKI67, a marker commonly used for proliferation in histology-based diagnosis of ACCs. Cluster 3 also includes the POLQ gene, encoding the translesional DNA polymerase Pole (involved in DNA repair and in DNA replication timing program) [24,25], together with homologous recombination repair (HR) genes (namely BRCA1, FANCD2, BLM and RAD51). Positive correlations between expression levels of POLQ and HR genes have recently been reported in lung, breast and colorectal cancers [26]. The authors suggested that an expression reprogramming involving these genes could prevent genetic instability in a cancer context. Indeed, we observed a similar correlation between POLQ and HR genes in ACCs. These genes are also associated with the MKI67 proliferation marker (Supplementary Figure 1). In ACCs, overexpression of POLQ and HR genes could contribute to genomic stability in highly proliferating tumors, possibly through DNA repair processes. mRNA levels of 28 genes in clusters 1 and 2 are associated with shorter time of relapse-free survival and overall survival, and are also independent of the cell proliferation marker MKI67 cell proliferation. Thus, they may provide additional information in the molecular characterization of ACCs (Table 1). A positive correlation with shorter time to relapse of high mRNA levels of POLB, POLL, REV1 and REV3L, and of low mRNA levels of POLK was noted. These genes encode translesion DNA polymerases, which can perform DNA synthesis despite the presence of DNA lesions. Altered gene expression and mutations affecting translesion polymerases have been observed in a variety of tumors and have been suggested to act as biomarkers in response to treatments [27-31]. The ability of translesion polymerases to perform synthesis despite DNA lesions contributes to resistance to DNA damaging treatments, and previous analyses have shown that their inhibition sensitizes tumors to chemotherapeutic agents [31-36]. Translesion poly- merases are also error-prone, and thus can contribute to mutagenesis in tumors and progression of cancers [37]. Our analyses show that abnormal gene expression of translesion DNA polymerases is indeed a marker of poor prognosis independent of proliferation in ACCs. The development of small molecules targeting translesion DNA synthesis could potentially be beneficial for ACC patients with tumors expressing high levels of mRNAs encoding POLß, POLA, REV1 and REV3L translesion DNA polymerases.
In the second part of this study, we focused our analyses on the CDK6 gene. CDK6 shares with CDK4 the ability to phosphorylate pRB and to induce the transition to S- phase of the cell cycle through the E2F-dependent
transcription program. These cell functions are shared by CDK4 and CDK6 but we observed no correlation between the mRNA levels encoding these two kinases. Indeed, a significant correlation with overall survival and time to relapse has only been observed for the CDK6 mRNA level (Table 1).
Since high expression levels of CDK6 are associated with poor prognosis in ACCs (Figures 1 and 2), the impact of CDK6 inhibitors on the SW-13 and NCI- H295R cell lines was evaluated (Figure 3). While NCI- H295R cells are classically used as ex vivo models of adrenocortical carcinoma, the origin of SW-13 is contested. SW-13 cells were derived from a small cell carcinoma in the adrenal cortex [38]. However, these cells secrete no steroids and it is unclear whether they were derived from a primary tumor in the adrenal cortex or from a metastasis [39]. Keeping in mind the dis- cussions concerning the origin of SW-13 cells, we chose to study the mechanisms reducing cell viability in this cell line in parallel with the pRB negative-NCI- H295R cells. SW-13 cells are highly sensitive to both palbociclib and ribociclib (Figure 3). Both drugs reduced SW-13 cell viability through an irreversible cell cycle arrest with a reduced proportion of cells in S- phase (Figure 4a). We also observed senescence features similar to those previously described in SW-13 cells [40]: ß-galactosidase activity, enlarged and flattened cells and high granularity (Figures 4b, 4c, 4d and 4h). Ribociclib being a highly specific inhibitor of CDK4/6, the senescence phenotype is probably induced by deregulation of their effector proteins, such as pRB that plays a pivotal role, as it regulates both G1/S transition and induction of senescence. Such a hypothesis is consistent with the reduction of Phospho- Rb observed in treated cells (Figure 5). However, the senescence phenotype was more pronounced in palbociclib-treated cells and we could not exclude the involvement of other targets. In contrast with SW-13 cells, NCI-H295R cells showed resistance to ribociclib, and a higher IC50 value for palbociclib when compared to SW-13 cells (Figure 3b). A homozygous deletion in the RB1 gene was previously described [21], and we confirmed the absence of the pRB protein in NCI- H295R extracts (Figure 5). The absence of pRB is probably involved in the NCI-H295R resistance to ribociclib, and also the relative resistance to palbociclib, as was observed in different types of cancers [41-44]. This resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors caused by pRB loss of function would concern 6.8% and 7% of ACC patients, as estimated with the TCGA and the French cohorts of patients respectively [10,18]. Thus, a majority of ACC patients might benefit from CDK4/6 inhibitors.
While only a slight increase of senescence features was observed at low concentrations of palbociclib (Figure 4b), apoptosis explained the reduction in viability in NCI-H295R cell line detected at >10 µM (Figure 6a). In our effort to determine the cellular mechanism causing apoptosis in these pRB negative cells, we tested the impact of treatments on the activity of GSK3B. This kinase and its regulator AKT are targets of palbociclib and GSK3ß phosphorylates ß-catenin, leading to ß- catenin degradation by the proteasome. Indeed, a higher ratio of active GSK3B and a reduction of the ß-catenin active form were observed after treatment with palbociclib (Figures 6b, c and d). Furthermore, the transcriptional activity of ß-catenin, was estimated with the level of AXIN2 mRNA. Actually, increased trans- cription activity was observed after treatment with palbociclib (Figure 6e). Our results are consistent with the higher AXIN2 mRNA level observed in NCI-H295R cells after treatment with PNU-74654, an inhibitor of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling [23]. Moreover, this Wnt/B- catenin signaling inhibitor increased apoptosis in NCI- H295R cell cultures. Taken together, our observations suggest that palbociclib induces a strong reduction of active ß-catenin, leading to aberrant transcription of ß- catenin targets and to apoptosis. Besides its impact on B-catenin-dependent transcription, PNU-74654 also decreased steroid hormone secretion by NCI-H295R cells, as early as after 24 h of treatment, at con- centrations higher than 50 µM [23]. This reduction preceded the decreased of viability (only after 72 h treatment with 50 µM PNU-74654) and was supposed to result partially from the reduction in gene expression of SF1 and CYP21A2 genes. While we confirmed that 100 µM PNU-74654 decreased cortisol secretion, we observed no effect of palbociclib and ribociclib on the concentration of cortisol in the medium, after 24 h and 48 h of treatments (Figure 6f). Actually, PNU-74654 results in direct inhibition of ß-catenin-dependent transcription that might cause the reduction of cortisol secretion as soon as after 24 h [23], comparatively to palbociclib that induces ß-catenin degradation (Figures 6b and 6d). Thus, the reduction in viability caused by palbociclib on NCI-H295R cells is not a consequence of a long steroid hormone deprivation but probably results from loss of ß-catenin-dependent transcription, through pRB-independent processes. Palbociclib concentrations that induced a significant viability reduction of NCI- H295R cells do not fall within a clinically attainable range in the plasma [45]. However, previous assays performed on xenograft mouse tumor tissue showed that higher palbociclib levels could be locally achieved in tumor samples (6h post-dose at 100 mg/kg could be up to 25,163 ng/g), comparatively to plasma levels [46].
a
SW13
b
NCI-H295R
Palbociclib
Palbociclib
Serine/Threonine Kinase
CyclinD1
CDK6
Serine/Threonine Kinase
CyclinD1
CDK6
P
P
P
GSK3-
E2F pRb
P
P
P
GSK3-B
pRb
ß-catenin
E2F
ß-catenin
ß-catenin
E2F
TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROGRAM
TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROGRAM
Anti-apoptosis
Cellular proliferation
Senescence inhibition
Anti-apoptosis
Cellular proliferation
Senescence inhibition
ß-catenin
Wild type ß-catenin
ß-catenin
p.S45P activated ß-catenin
Possible models of palbociclib action on the two cell lines used here are shown in Figure 7. In both cases, palbociclib inhibits phosphorylation of Serine9-GSK3B, that in turn induces a decrease of ß-catenin signaling and changes the transcription level of its targets. These results indicate that palbociclib and ribocilib constitute potential treatments for ACCs, prompting us to test the impact of combination therapy with mitotane, a drug currently used to treat ACCs. However, only additive effects were observed when tested on the SW-13 and NCI-H295R cell lines. Since SW-13 cells have a normal amount of pRB, palbociclib also directly inhibits pRB phosphorylation, resulting in E2F inactivation and in the consequent arrest of the G1/S transition.
In conclusion, we showed that patients with high CDK6 expression levels present a poor prognosis, and are found in a unique gene expression-based cluster. They share common clinical and molecular features, such as secretion of hormones and the tendency to accumulate
mutations in the Wnt/B-catenin pathway. Through its common action on the CDK6 activity and Wnt/B- catenin dependent transcription, palbociclib might be a treatment of choice for patients showing these molecu- lar features. However, clinical assays will be necessary to verify whether ACC patients benefit from this treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Transcriptome and miRNome of adrenocortical carcinomas
Gene expression and miRNA expression in 79 adenocortical carcinomas were initially measured experimentally with Illumina HiSeq 2000 instruments, and treated as previously described [10]. For the present study, TCGA level 3 interpreted gene expression and miRNA expression data were downloaded from the TCGA data portal ( url: https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/
docs/publications/tega/). Level 3 indicates that gene- level expression estimates are given as RSEM (RNA- Seq by Expectation Maximization) normalized counts. Level 3 miRNA expression-interpreted data are the miRNA transcription estimates in log2, as reads per million miRNAs mapped. Expression data from 44 adrenocortical carcinomas of French patients were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO accession: GSE49278) Database. Gene expression levels were measured using the Affymetrix Human Gene 2.0 ST Array. The downloaded values of gene expression were estimated and normalized as previously described [18]. The 137 gene expression data were selected in transcriptome data files using gene symbols with Unix shell homemade scripts.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses and figures were obtained using the R 3.2.2 environment [47]. Hierarchical clustering analyses and drawings of heatmaps were performed with homemade scripts using the gplots [48], vegan [49], RColorBrewer and heatmap3 [50] packages, or the ggplot2 [51] R package. Annotations of graphs were drawn using the pBrackets package. Survival analyses were performed with the stats, OIsurv and maxstat R packages. The cutoff value of expression that segregated the patients into two groups was the one that optimized the pValue of the Log-rank test. This optimi- zation was performed using the maxstat R package.
Reagents
Palbociclib (PD-0332991, IBRANCE®), Ribociclib (LEE-011, Kiskali®), Mitotane and PNU-74654 were purchased from CliniSciences (A8316, A8641, sc- 205754 and sc-258020, respectively). Palbociclib and Ribociclib 1mM stock solutions were prepared in 100% ethanol or DMSO respectively. PNU-74654 stock solution (31.2 mM) was prepared in DMSO. Anti- CDK6 (D4S8S), CDK4 (D9G3E), Phospho-Rb (9308), GSK3-ß (D5C5Z), Phospho-GSK3-ß (D85E12), non- phospho-ß-Catenin (D13A1) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. The anti-ß-Catenin (MA1-301) and GAPDH (GA1R) were purchased from Thermo Fischer Scientific. The anti-a-Tubulin (T9026) was purchased from Sigma.
Cell cultures
The SW-13 (ATCC® CCL-105™M) and NCI-H295R (ATCC® CRL-2128™M) cell lines from ATCC were from LGC-Standards. SW-13 cells were cultured in DMEM with 4.5 g/L D-glucose, L-glutamine and pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life Technologies, 41966-029), supplemented with 12.5% Nu-Serum™
(Corning, 355500), 1:100 ITS Premix (Corning, 354350), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies, 15140122). SW-13 cells were sub-cultured every three days at a 1:8 ratio. NCI-H295R cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) / Nutrient mixture F-12 Ham (1:1), supplemented with GlutaMAX™M-I (Life Technologies, 31331-028), 2.5% Nu-Serum™ (Corning), 1:100 Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium Premix (Corning, 354350), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies, 15140122). The subculture of NCI-H295R was carried out every four days at a 1:4 ratio. SW-13 and NCI-H295R cells were cultured in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. They were seeded at a density of 5500 cells/cm2 and 50,000 cells/cm2 respectively, in 6-well or 96-well plates (TPP) for viability assays, senescence assays and protein extractions, and Petri dishes before quantitative RT- PCR experiments. Twenty-four hours after plating, palbociclib, ribociclib, 100% ethanol or DMSO was added to the cell culture, and 96 h after the addition of palbociclib or ribociclib, senescence assays, protein extracts and quantitative RT-PCR were performed as described below.
Cellular proliferation assay
Cells were plated in 96-well plates (TPP), and incubated for 24 h, before treatment with palbociclib, ribociclib or the corresponding vehicle. After 96 h of treatment, viability was assayed using the CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability kit (Promega), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Luminescence was measured with a SpectraMax i3 Multi-Mode Microplate Detection Platform (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Assays were performed in duplicates, in three independent experiments.
Cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry
Cells were plated in 6-well plates (TPP), and incubated for 24 h, before treatment with palbociclib, ribociclib or the corresponding vehicle. After 94 h of treatment, 10 AM EdU was added to the cell culture media for 2 h. The cells were then collected and washed twice with PBS. Click-it reactions were performed using the Click- iT Plus EdU Alexa Fluor 647 Flow Cytometry Kit (ThermoFischer Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The cells were then counterstained with propidium iodide for 30 min. The cell cycle profile was generated using a CyAn ADP 9C analyser (Beckman Coulter). The analysis was performed with the Flowjo software (LLC). Cell cycle was studied on technical duplicates, in three indepen- dent experiments.
Cortisol assay
200,000 NCI-H295R cells were plated in 24-well plates (TPP) in a volume of 500 uL of culture medium. After 24 hours, cells were treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, PNU-74654 or the corresponding vehicle. Drugs or vehicle were added in 500 uL of culture medium, to a total volume of 1 mL. After 48h of treatment, cortisol concentration was measured in the supernatant of NCI- H295R cells, using the Cortisol ELISA kit of Cayman chemical (ref: 500360), as described by the manufac- turer. Before the assay, all the supernatants (except that with PNU-74654) were diluted 1:10 in fresh culture medium. Assays were performed in technical duplicates on cell media from three independent experiments.
Measurement of apoptosis
To measure apoptosis, the cells were seeded at the previously mentioned concentration used in 96-well plates. They were drugged 24 h later and images were obtained using the Essen IncuCyte® ZOOM Live-Cell Analysis system. For the apoptosis experiments, caspase and cytotoxicity reagents (Essen Bioscience, Ltd, Welwyn, Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK) were added to the medium, resulting in a 1:1000 dilution of each reagent. Cell apoptosis and cytotoxicity of the drug were monitored for 96 h after treatment with 4 acquisitions per well every hour. Each condition was performed in triplicate. Analysis was performed using the software for the IncuCyte® ZOOM Live-Cell Analysis system. Assays were performed in duplicates, in three independent experiments.
Senescence-associated ß-galactosidase assay
After 96 h of cell treatment in 6-well plates (ATCC) with palbociclib, ribociclb or the vehicle, the senescence assay was performed using the Senescence B-Galactosidase Staining Kit (Cell Signaling, #9860), as described by the manufacturer. The cells were rinsed with Dulbecco’s phosphate-Buffered Saline (Invitro- gen), and fixed as described by the manufacturer. They were then incubated in 500 uL per well of X-Gal staining solution mix overnight at 37℃. Pictures of four fields (200X total magnification) of each well were taken with a Nikon Digital Sight DS-Fi1 mounted on a Nikon Eclipse TS100 microscope (Nikon France, Champigny-sur-marne, France). Senescent cells were then counted using the ImageJ program. Assays were performed in experimental duplicates (2 wells), in three independent experiments.
Clonogenic assay
SW-13 (5,500 cells/cm2) or 50,000 NCI-H295R cells/
cm2 were plated in 6-well plates (TPP). Drugs were added to the cell-culture media 24 h later at appropriate concentrations. The cells were incubated with the drugs for 96 h, before new counting and plating at 400 cells/ cm2 (SW-13 cells) or 5,000 cells/cm2 (NCI-H295R) in 6-well plates. Seven days (SW-13 cells) or 10 days (NCI-H295R) later, the cells were fixed with 4% para- formaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature and colored with 0.05% crystal violet (Sigma, C3886) diluted in water for 30 min. The clones from three independent experiments were counted.
Western blot analysis
Cells were grown on 35 mm plates (ATCC) and protein extracted with lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5% NP40 (#492016) (Merck Millipore), 1% Triton X-100 (9002-93-1, Sigma Aldrich), cOmplete™ EDTA- free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma Aldrich), and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail Set II (524625, Merck Millipore). Proteins were separated on NuPAGEtm 4- 12% Bis-Tris gels (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare). Primary antibodies were diluted at a final concentration of 1:1000 in Tris-buffered saline solution with 0.05% TWEEN® 20. Secondary antibodies were used as recommended in the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative quantifications were performed on three different western blot experiments.
Gene expression
RNAs were extracted with the Nucleospin® RNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel), following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA extracts (2 ug) were treated with 0.1 U/uL of DNAse I (Thermo Fischer Scientific), in a total volume of 20 uL at 37°℃ for 30 min. DNase I was then inactivated by heating at 65℃ for 10 min after addition of 2 uL of 50 mM EDTA (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Reverse transcription of 1 µg of DNase I-treated RNA was performed using 15 ng/uL random primers (Invitrogen), 1 U/uL Ribolock RNase inhibitor, 1 mM of each dNTP and 10 U/uL RevertAid reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), in a final volume of 20 uL. The reaction was performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler thermocycler machine (Eppendorf France, Montesson, France), for 5 min at 25℃ and then 60 min at 42℃. Reaction was stopped by heating at 70℃ for 5 min. Quantitative PCRs were performed with 1 µL of 1/5 diluted first strands of cDNA in a total volume of 15 uL of 1X ABsolute SYBR Capillary Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AB-1285), with 73 nM of each PCR primer. Reactions were performed in 20 uL LightCycler capil-
laries (Roche). Primer sequences were as follows: AXIN2-F 5’-GCTGACGGATGATTCCATGT-3’, AXIN2-R 5’-ACTGCCCACACGATAAGGAG-3’[52], ACTB-F 5’-GAGCTACGAGCTGCCTGAC-3’ and ACTB-R 5’-GCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3’. PCR amplification was performed with a LightCycler 1.5 thermocycler and analyzed with LightCycler Software 3.5 (Roche, Boulogne-Billancourt, France). Cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation of enzyme 95℃ for 15 minutes, and 50 amplification cycles (95℃ for 15 sec, 60℃ for 30 sec and 72℃ for 20 sec) before annealing of all samples and gradual temperature increase to 95℃ to trace the melting curve. Assays were performed in technical triplicates on RNAs extracted from three independent experiments.
Abbreviations
ACC, Adrenocortical carcinoma; COSMIC, Catalogue of Somatic Mutations In Cancers; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2’- deoxyuridine; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; HR, Homologous Recombination; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; OS, Overall Survival; RFS, Relapse Free Survival; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; RSEM, RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceived and designed the experiments: DH, JCC, CM, GB, FF. Performed the experiments: DH, SK, TD, LBD, FF. Analyzed the data: DH, SK, TD, FF, GB. Contributed to analysis tools: DH, TD, SK, FF. Wrote the paper: DH, GB and FF.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Anne-Lise Haenni (CNRS-UMR 7592, Institut Jacques-Monod, Paris, France) for attentive reading and correction of the manuscript. We acknowledge Tamara Advedissian and Frédérique Deshayes (CNRS-UMR 7592, Institut Jacques-Monod) for helpful discussions and suggestions, and also Griselda Wentzinger of the ImagoSeine core facility of the Institut Jacques Monod, member of IBiSA and France-BioImaging (ANR-10-INBS-04) insfrastruc- tures, for her technical help. We are grateful to all the patients and families who contributed to The Consortium Genome Atlas study.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors of this manuscript declare no conflicts of interest.
FUNDING
The project was supported by La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (RS16/75-108 and RS17/75-135), the Groupement des Entreprises Françaises contre le Cancer (GEFLUC), and by the generous legacy from Mrs Suzanne Larzat to the group.
REFERENCES
1. Kebebew E, Reiff E, Duh QY, Clark OH, McMillan A. Extent of disease at presentation and outcome for adrenocortical carcinoma: have we made progress? World J Surg. 2006; 30:872-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0329-x
2. Else T, Kim AC, Sabolch A, Raymond VM, Kandathil A, Caoili EM, Jolly S, Miller BS, Giordano TJ, Hammer GD. Adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Rev. 2014; 35:282- 326. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2013-1029
3. Ip JC, Pang TC, Glover AR, Soon P, Zhao JT, Clarke S, Robinson BG, Gill AJ, Sidhu SB. Immunohistochemical validation of overexpressed genes identified by global expression microarrays in adrenocortical carcinoma reveals potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Oncologist. 2015; 20:247-56. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0392
4. Beuschlein F, Weigel J, Saeger W, Kroiss M, Wild V, Daffara F, Libé R, Ardito A, Al Ghuzlan A, Quinkler M, Oßwald A, Ronchi CL, de Krijger R, et al. Major prognostic role of Ki67 in localized adrenocortical carcinoma after complete resection. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100:841-49. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-3182
5. Morimoto R, Satoh F, Murakami O, Suzuki T, Abe T, Tanemoto M, Abe M, Uruno A, Ishidoya S, Arai Y, Takahashi K, Sasano H, Ito S. Immunohistochemistry of a proliferation marker Ki67/MIB1 in adrenocortical carcinomas: Ki67/MIB1 labeling index is a predictor for recurrence of adrenocortical carcinomas. Endocr J. 2008; 55:49-55. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.K07-079
6. Allolio B, Fassnacht M. Clinical review: Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91:2027-37. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005- 2639
7. Giordano TJ, Kuick R, Else T, Gauger PG, Vinco M, Bauersfeld J, Sanders D, Thomas DG, Doherty G, Hammer G. Molecular classification and prognostica- tion of adrenocortical tumors by transcriptome profiling. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15:668-76. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1067
8. de Reyniès A, Assié G, Rickman DS, Tissier F, Groussin L, René-Corail F, Dousset B, Bertagna X, Clauser E,
Bertherat J. Gene expression profiling reveals a new classification of adrenocortical tumors and identifies molecular predictors of malignancy and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:1108-15.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5678
9. Assié G, Guillaud-Bataille M, Ragazzon B, Bertagna X, Bertherat J, Clauser E. The pathophysiology, diagnosis and prognosis of adrenocortical tumors revisited by transcriptome analyses. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 21:325-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.009
10. Zheng S, Cherniack AD, Dewal N, Moffitt RA, Danilova L, Murray BA, Lerario AM, Else T, Knijnenburg TA, Ciriello G, Kim S, Assie G, Morozova O, et al, and Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Compre- hensive Pan-Genomic Characterization of Adreno- cortical Carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016; 29:723-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.002
11. Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Charlab R, Chen W, Palmby T, Tilley A, Zirkelbach JF, Yu J, Liu Q, Zhao L, Crich J, Chen XH, Hughes M, et al. FDA approval: palbociclib for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2- negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21:4760-66. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078- 0432.CCR-15-1185
12. Walker A, Wedam S, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Sridhara R, Chen W, Palmby T, Fourie Zirkelbach J, Fu W, Liu Q, Tilley A, Kim G, et al. FDA Approval of Palbociclib in Combination with Fulvestrant for the Treatment of Hormone Receptor- Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 1:1-14. 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
13. Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, Ettl J, Patel R, Pinter T, Schmidt M, Shparyk Y, Thummala AR, Voytko NL, et al. The cyclin- dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA- 1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16:25-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3
14. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im SA, Gelmon K, Harbeck N, Lipatov ON, Walshe JM, Moulder S, Gauthier E, Lu DR, Randolph S, et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:1925-36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607303
15. Infante JR, Cassier PA, Gerecitano JF, Witteveen PO, Chugh R, Ribrag V, Chakraborty A, Matano A, Dobson
JR, Crystal AS, Parasuraman S, Shapiro GI. A Phase I Study of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib (LEE011) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors and Lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22:5696-705. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078- 0432.CCR-16-1248
16. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Blackwell KL, André F, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, et al. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:1738-48.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1609709
17. Hiroyuki O, Susumu G, Kazushige S, Wataru F, Hidemasa B, Minoru K. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27: 29- 34.
18. Assié G, Letouzé E, Fassnacht M, Jouinot A, Luscap W, Barreau O, Omeiri H, Rodriguez S, Perlemoine K, René-Corail F, Elarouci N, Sbiera S, Kroiss M, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014; 46:607-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2953
19. Abiven G, Coste J, Groussin L, Anract P, Tissier F, Legmann P, Dousset B, Bertagna X, Bertherat J. Clinical and biological features in the prognosis of adrenocortical cancer: poor outcome of cortisol- secreting tumors in a series of 202 consecutive patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91:2650-55. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2730
20. Germano A, Rapa I, Volante M, De Francia S, Migliore C, Berruti A, Papotti M, Terzolo M. RRM1 modulates mitotane activity in adrenal cancer cells interfering with its metabolization. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015; 401:105-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2014.11.027
21. Ragazzon B, Libé R, Assié G, Tissier F, Barreau O, Houdayer C, Perlemoine K, Audebourg A, Clauser E, René-Corail F, Bertagna X, Dousset B, Bertherat J, Groussin L. Mass-array screening of frequent mutations in cancers reveals RB1 alterations in aggressive adrenocortical carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014; 170:385-91. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0778
22. Sumi NJ, Kuenzi BM, Knezevic CE, Remsing Rix LL, Rix U. Chemoproteomics Reveals Novel Protein and Lipid Kinase Targets of Clinical CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Lung Cancer. ACS Chem Biol. 2015; 10:2680-86. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.5b00368
23. Leal LF, Bueno AC, Gomes DC, Abduch R, de Castro M, Antonini SR. Inhibition of the Tcf/beta-catenin complex increases apoptosis and impairs adreno-
cortical tumor cell proliferation and adrenal steroidogenesis. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:43016-32. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5513
24. Fernandez-Vidal A, Guitton-Sert L, Cadoret JC, Drac M, Schwob E, Baldacci G, Cazaux C, Hoffmann JS. A role for DNA polymerase 0 in the timing of DNA replication. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4285. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5285
25. Baldacci G, Hoffmann JS, Cadoret JC. Impact of the DNA polymerase Theta on the DNA replication program. Genom Data. 2014; 3:90-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2014.11.014
26. Goullet de Rugy T, Bashkurov M, Datti A, Betous R, Guitton-Sert L, Cazaux C, Durocher D, Hoffmann JS. Excess Pole functions in response to replicative stress in homologous recombination-proficient cancer cells. Biol Open. 2016; 5:1485-92. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.018028
27. Ceppi P, Novello S, Cambieri A, Longo M, Monica V, Lo lacono M, Giaj-Levra M, Saviozzi S, Volante M, Papotti M, Scagliotti G. Polymerase eta mRNA expression predicts survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15:1039-45. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1227
28. Wang J, Cazzato E, Ladewig E, Frattini V, Rosenbloom DI, Zairis S, Abate F, Liu Z, Elliott O, Shin YJ, Lee JK, Lee IH, Park WY, et al. Clonal evolution of glioblastoma under therapy. Nat Genet. 2016; 48:768-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3590
29. Zhou W, Chen YW, Liu X, Chu P, Loria S, Wang Y, Yen Y, Chou KM. Expression of DNA translesion synthesis polymerase n in head and neck squamous cell cancer predicts resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin- based chemotherapy. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e83978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083978
30. Zhang X, Chen Q, Chen J, He C, Mao J, Dai Y, Yang X, Hu W, Zhu C, Chen B. Association of polymorphisms in translesion synthesis genes with prognosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24103
31. Peng C, Chen Z, Wang S, Wang HW, Qiu W, Zhao L, Xu R, Luo H, Chen Y, Chen D, You Y, Liu N, Wang H. The error-prone DNA polymerase k promotes temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma through Rad17-dependent activation of ATR-Chk1 signaling. Cancer Res. 2016; 76:2340-53. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1884
32. Dai CH, Chen P, Li J, Lan T, Chen YC, Qian H, Chen K, Li MY. Co-inhibition of pol 0 and HR genes efficiently synergize with cisplatin to suppress cisplatin-resistant
lung cancer cells survival. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:65157- 70. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11214
33. Srivastava AK, Han C, Zhao R, Cui T, Dai Y, Mao C, Zhao W, Zhang X, Yu J, Wang QE. Enhanced expression of DNA polymerase eta contributes to cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112:4411-16. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421365112
34. Huang KK, Jang KW, Kim S, Kim HS, Kim SM, Kwon HJ, Kim HR, Yun HJ, Ahn MJ, Park KU, Ramnarayanan K, McPherson JR, Zhang S, et al. Exome sequencing reveals recurrent REV3L mutations in cisplatin- resistant squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:19552. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19552
35. Wang W, Sheng W, Yu C, Cao J, Zhou J, Wu J, Zhang H, Zhang S. REV3L modulates cisplatin sensitivity of non- small cell lung cancer H1299 cells. Oncol Rep. 2015; 34:1460-68. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4121
36. Yang L, Shi T, Liu F, Ren C, Wang Z, Li Y, Tu X, Yang G, Cheng X. REV3L, a promising target in regulating the chemosensitivity of cervical cancer cells. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0120334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120334
37. Xie K, Doles J, Hemann MT, Walker GC. Error-prone translesion synthesis mediates acquired chemo- resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107:20792- 97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011412107
38. Wang T, Rainey WE. Human adrenocortical carcinoma cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012; 351:58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.08.041
39. Leibovitz A, McCombs WM 3rd, Johnston D, McCoy CE, Stinson JC. New human cancer cell culture lines. I. SW-13, small-cell carcinoma of the adrenal cortex. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973; 51:691-97.
40. Shanahan F, Seghezzi W, Parry D, Mahony D, Lees E. Cyclin E associates with BAF155 and BRG1, components of the mammalian SWI-SNF complex, and alters the ability of BRG1 to induce growth arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19:1460-69. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.2.1460
41. Dean JL, Thangavel C, Mcclendon AK, Reed CA, Knudsen ES. Therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: key mechanisms of response and failure. Oncogene. 2010; 29:4018-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.154
42. Konecny GE, Winterhoff B, Kolarova T, Qi J, Manivong K, Dering J, Yang G, Chalukya M, Wang HJ, Anderson L, Kalli KR, Finn RS, Ginther C, et al. Expression of p16 and retinoblastoma determines response to CDK4/6 inhibition in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;
17:1591-602.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078- 0432.CCR-10-2307
43. Logan JE, Mostofizadeh N, Desai AJ, VON Euw E, Conklin D, Konkankit V, Hamidi H, Eckardt M, Anderson L, Chen HW, Ginther C, Taschereau E, Bui PH, et al. PD-0332991, a potent and selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, demons- trates inhibition of proliferation in renal cell carcino- ma at nanomolar concentrations and molecular markers predict for sensitivity. Anticancer Res. 2013; 33:2997-3004.
44. Michaud K, Solomon DA, Oermann E, Kim JS, Zhong WZ, Prados MD, Ozawa T, James CD, Waldman T. Pharmacologic inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 arrests the growth of glioblastoma multi- forme intracranial xenografts. Cancer Res. 2010; 70:3228-38. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008- 5472.CAN-09-4559
45. Schwartz GK, LoRusso PM, Dickson MA, Randolph SS, Shaik MN, Wilner KD, Courtney R, O’Dwyer PJ. Phase I study of PD 0332991, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, administered in 3-week cycles (Schedule 2/1). Br J Cancer. 2011; 104:1862-68. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.177
46. Nguyen L, Zhong WZ, Painter CL, Zhang C, Rahavendran SV, Shen Z. Quantitative analysis of PD 0332991 in xenograft mouse tumor tissue by a 96- well supported liquid extraction format and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010; 53:228-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.02.031
47. Team RR. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2015. Available from https://www.r-project.org/
48. Warnes G, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Huber W, Liaw A, Lumley T, Maechler M, Magnusson A, Moeller S, Schwartz M, Venables B. gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. 2015.
49. Oksanen J, Blanchet G, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’Hara RB, Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens H, Wagner H. vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2016. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan
50. Shilin Z, Guo Y, Sheng Q, Shyr Y. heatmap3: An Improved Heatmap PackageNo Title. 2015. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/package=heatmap3
51. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York; 2009. Available from http://ggplot2.org
52. Okabe H, Kinoshita H, Imai K, Nakagawa S, Higashi T, Arima K, Uchiyama H, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Itoh S,
Ishiko T, Yoshizumi T, Beppu T, et al. Diverse basis of B-catenin activation in human hepatocellular carcinoma: implications in biology and prognosis. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0152695.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152695
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Please browse the link in Full text version to see
Supplementary Table 1. Association of 136 genes involved in G1/S phase transition, DNA replication and DNA damage response with overall survival and relapse free survival) in ACC patients of the TCGA consortium.
Data from n=54 and n=79 ACC samples were used for the log-rank correlation test for RFS and OS, respectively. Log-Rank tests the difference of RFS or OS time between “High” and “Low” expression groups of patients. The cutoff is the value of gene expression maximizing the significance of the difference between those two groups. The percentile is the proportion of individuals below the cutoff value. Adjusted p (Adj p) values have been obtained following the Benjamini Hochberg method. Significant Adj p values are written in bold characters. The correlation with MKI67 gene expression value was tested with Pearson test. Correl. coef. is the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient that estimates the correlation of the expression level of each gene and of MKI67.
Clusters of genes
Pearson correlation coefficient
with MKI-67
1
2
3
4
-1
0
+1
ORC3L
CCND3
CDKNIA
RRM2B
REV1
CCND1
POLI
ATR
E2F4
TP53
ABL2 POLK
1
RAD50
RB1
CCND2
POLN
POLL
POLD4
CDKNIC
ATM
MCM9
POLM
FAN1
CDK6
REV3L
ORC2L
ORC4L
ATRIP
POLG2
SMARCAL1
TFDP2
RPA1
RMI1
E2F5
2
RPA4
WRN
HDAC3
ORC5L
CDKN2B
E2F3 HUS1
CDKN1B RFC1
RAD17
TP53BP1
GINS3
TOP1
NBN
H2AFX
XRCC3
MAD2L2
POLDS
POLA2
CHEK1
RFC2 BLM
CCNE1
GENT POLE PCNA
E2F1
ORC6L
GINS1
GINS2
GMNN
LIG1
RMI2
TOP2A EXO1
MCM10
MKI67
ORC1L
CDC45
RAM2 E2F2 RAD51
3
MCM7 MCM3
MCM6 CDC7
FEN1 MCM5
EME1
COT1
TICAR
CDC6
POLD1 POLE2
GINS4
POLQ
FANCD2
RFC4 MCM2 BRCA1 CHEK2
CDK2 RFC5
XRCC2
WDHD1 MCM4
TIMELESS
CLSPN
BRCA2
RRM1
MDC1
PARP1
RFC3
FANCM
TFDP1
POLE3
DBF4
POLD2 POLG
HDAC2
POLE4
POLH
RAD51C
CDKN2D
4
RAD1
TIPIN
BPA2
RPA3
1.0
POLA1
TOP3A
RBL1 TOPBP1
RAD51L3
0.5
MRE11A MCM8 MUS81
CDKN2A
0.0
RADSA
CDKN2C
HDAC1
POLB
CDK4
-0.5
Supplementary Figure 1 Pearson correlation coefficient-based heatmap representing the similarity of 137 gene expression values in 79 ACCs. The 137 genes (right side) are involved in G1/S transition, and in DNA replication and repair. Colors indicate the Pearson correlation coefficient values between genes, as indicated by the color scale at the bottom-right. Dissimilarities between clusters are indicated by the dendrogram (right side). Hierarchical clustering of genes based on Pearson correlation coefficient values resulted in four clusters of genes, as indicated in the dot plot at the right side, and at the top of the heatmap. In the dot plot, dots indicate the Pearson correlation coefficient values between each gene and MKI67. Grey colored dashed lines indicate the threshold correlation coefficient values for a significant Pearson correlation test (+/- 0.21).
a
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
64
128
IP Area
192
256
0
64 128 192 256
IP Area
0
64
128
IP Area
192
256
0
64
128
IP Area
192
256
0
64
128
IP Area
192
Eth
Palbociclib 1uM
Palbociclib 5uM
Eth
Palbociclib 10uM
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
Counts
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
64 128 192 256
IP Area
0
64
128
IP Area
192
256
0
64
128
IP Area
192
256
0
64
128
Ribociclib 1uM SW13
IP Area DMSO
192
256
0
64 128 192 256
IP Area
DMSO
Ribociclib 5uM
Ribociclib 10uM
NCI-H295R
b
50 μm
[PD033291] = 1µM
[PD033291] = 5μM
[PD033291] = 10μM
Ethanol = 0,1%
Ethanol = 0,5%
[P5039201} 4%0PM
[LEE011] = 1µM
[LEE011] = 5M
[LEE011] = 10μM
DMSO = 0,1%
DMSO = 0,5%
DMSO = 1%
SW13
NCI-H295R
256