Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Complete Surgical Resection After 18 Years

Harsha V. Polavarapua, d, Sergio Casillasª, Pamela Edmondsb, Philip S. Lime, Christopher M. Pezziª

Abstract

Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare neoplasm often asso- ciated with an aggressive biological behavior. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy for ACC and offers the best chance for prolonged disease-free survival. We present an unusual case of a long-standing adrenal mass, well documented over a pe- riod of at least 18 years, without the development of metastatic dis- ease, and ultimately proven to represent ACC after successful sur- gical resection. Physicians should be aware that ACC can present with a wide spectrum of biological behavior, from very aggressive to more indolent disease.

Keywords: Adrenocortical carcinoma; Weiss criteria

Introduction

Adrenal cortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare neoplasm often associated with an aggressive natural history. As the second most aggressive endocrine malignancy after anaplastic car- cinoma of thyroid, ACC accounts for approximately 0.2% of all cancer deaths in the United States annually, with an incidence of approximately 1 to 2 cases per million people

Manuscript accepted for publication August 22, 2011

ªDepartments of Surgery, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA, USA

bDepartments of Pathology, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA, USA

“Departments of Radiology, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA, USA

Corresponding author: Harsha V. Polavarapu, Abington Memorial Hospital, Department of Surgery, 1200 Old York Road, Abington, PA 19001, USA. Email: hpolavarapu@amh.org

doi:10.4021/wjon369w

per year [1-4]. We present an unusual case of a long-standing adrenal mass, well documented over a period of at least 18 years, without the development of metastatic disease, which was ultimately proven to represent ACC after successful sur- gical resection.

Case Report

A 47-year-old woman was referred by her primary physician for a surgical opinion concerning an asymptomatic, 14 cm, right adrenal mass described on recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The right adrenal mass had been previously radiographically identified at least as far back as 1992. Surgi- cal resection had been recommended to the patient back in 1992 at another institution, but she had declined, reportedly because of a fear of the major surgery at the time. Therefore, the mass was simply followed intermittently over the ensu- ing 18 years at irregular intervals without a definitive diag- nosis or any treatment. Her past medical history included at- tention deficit disorder, asthma, benign cystic breast disease, breast reduction surgery and a recently identified 9 x 4.6 cm left adnexal mass. On careful questioning, she denied any symptoms from the large adrenal mass, including any pain, fullness, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia or increasing abdomi- nal girth. Abdominal examination was also normal, without any palpable mass or other related findings.

Laboratory studies revealed a serum cortisol level of 10.7 mcg/dL (normal 3-17), serum aldosterone of 2 ng/dL (normal 3-16), plasma renin of 1.46 ng/mL/h (normal 0.25- 5.82) and serum metanephrines of 131 pg/mL (normal <205) indicating that the tumor was non-functioning. MRI of the abdomen revealed a 14 cm, irregular, right adrenal mass with heterogeneous density and attenuation characteristics con- cerning for malignancy. Comparison with a previous MRI examination provided by the patient from 1992 revealed that the mass had slowly increased in size (from 6 cm to 14 cm) and changed in appearance over the period of 18 years (Fig. 1A, B). There was no evidence of metastatic disease seen to any lymph nodes, the liver, or the lungs.

Surgical resection of the large, and enlarging, right adre- nal mass was recommended both for diagnosis and for treat-

Figure 1. Serial MRI examinations spanning 18 years, showing low signal mass in the right adrenal gland which is irregular and heterogeneous on (A) Axial T1 spin echo measuring 6 cm in 1992 and (B) Axial T1 inphase gradient echo sequence measuring 14 cm in 2010.

SCA

+

29

5 0

D

H

M

A

B

ment. However, the patient first underwent a laparoscopic left salpingo-oophorectomy to exclude malignancy in the large, complex, left adnexal mass. Final pathology from the adnexal mass was a benign luteal cyst, hydrosalpinx, and endometriosis. After successful recovery from the salpingo- oophorectomy, elective right adrenalectomy was undertaken using an open, trans-abdominal approach through a generous right subcostal incision.

At laparotomy, the large adrenal mass was found adher- ent to the capsule of the liver posteriorly and inseparable from the right diaphragm. It did not involve the right kidney. A separate small mass was also palpable in the fundus of the gallbladder, distant from the adrenal mass. An en-bloc resec- tion of the entire adrenal mass, along with a portion of the right diaphragm and a portion of the capsule of the right lobe of the liver was performed. The diaphragm was closed pri- marily with permanent sutures without a chest tube. Simple cholecystectomy was also performed, with a benign intraop- erative frozen section of the gallbladder mass. The estimated blood loss was 100 cc, and she received 2 units of packed red blood cell transfusion intraoperatively.

The postoperative course was initially unremarkable. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 4. She was however readmitted 2 weeks postoperatively with shortness of breath secondary to a large, right-sided, pleural

effusion. The pleural effusion required drainage using a tem- porary pigtail catheter. She was again discharged, and then fully recovered.

The final pathology revealed the adrenal tumor to be 14 cm in maximum diameter, with a weight of 566 gm. Exten- sive necrosis was present, along with gross calcifications. The tumor was densely adherent and fibrosed to the dia- phragm, but not actually invading microscopically. Sections showed a neoplastic process consisting of large polygonal cells with abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. Nuclei were markedly variable in size, with some showing large intra-nuclear inclusions. Extensive zonal necrosis was pres- ent. Invasion into, but not through, the capsule was present. The nuclear grade was high (Fuhrmann grade IV). The tumor was oncocytic with less than 25% of clear cells. There was a diffuse growth pattern (Fig. 2A, B, C). Based on a Weiss Score of 5 (of 9) the final pathologic diagnosis was adreno- cortical carcinoma. Additional microscopic features that did not meet the Weiss criteria were as follows: the tumor did not exceed a mitotic rate of more than 5/50 high power fields, there were no atypical mitoses, the tumor was not sinusoidal, and there was no vascular invasion identified.

No adjuvant therapy was recommended. The patient continues to do well and no evidence of disease 7 months after the surgical resection.

Figure 2. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the tumor demonstrating 3 of the Weiss criteria of ACC: (A) tumor necrosis, 400x; (B) grade IV nuclei, 400x; (C) invasion into, but not through the capsule, 100x.

o

A

B

C

-

Discussion

ACCs are frequently large, and size has been reported to be a prognostic factor [5]. A very large ACC is concerning for a late or terminal stage in the natural history of the disease. However, despite the presence of a 14 cm tumor, and its ex- istence for at least 18 years, the patient reported had no evi- dence of distant metastasis and was ultimately still surgically resectable.

Although ACCs can develop at any age, there is a bi- modal age distribution, with disease peaks before the age of 5 years and in the fourth to fifth decade of life. In general, the level of aggressiveness and pace of disease progression are more rapid in adults than in children [6].

Nearly half of ACCs are functional, frequently result- ing in symptoms that lead to recognition and diagnosis. Many of the nonfunctional tumors will remain without signs or symptoms of the disease until the tumor either becomes large enough to cause symptoms from compression of near- by structures, or the patient develops symptoms from the metastatic disease. The remainder is identified incidentally on radiographic imaging done for other reasons. The patient reported was symptom-free and the mass was non-function- al. Her tumor was identified incidentally on radiographic imaging.

Computerized tomography (CT) is useful in distinguish- ing benign adrenal adenomas from ACC. MRI is a comple- mentary diagnostic modality to CT, in that local invasion and involvement of the vena cava are more readily identifiable. Imaging phenotype consistent with ACC include the follow- ing: irregular shape; large size (> 4 cm in diameter); intral- esional calcification; tumor heterogeneity on both plain films and contrast enhancement, which may indicate intralesional hemorrhage, necrosis, or both; unilateral location; high CT attenuation values (especially with > 20 HU) and evidence of tumor invasion of local structures or extension into major vessels [7]. Imaging of our patient showed many of the typi- cal characteristics of ACC, with a large, unilateral, irregular, partially calcified, heterogenous mass. However invasion of local structures or vascular invasion was not seen.

Despite multiple improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of other types of solid malignancies over the past 2 decades, ACC continues to be a highly lethal malignancy with poor overall survival and few effective treatment op- tions [8]. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy for ACC and offers the best chance for prolonged disease-free survival and cure. The principle prognostic fac- tors for ACC are complete surgical resection of the tumor and an early stage at diagnosis [9]. In our patient there was microscopic invasion of the tumor into, but not through, the tumor capsule. The portion of the diaphragm that was removed represented adherence by a fibrotic reaction from the longstanding tumor, but was without invasive tumor in- volvement into the muscle on microscopic examination.

Weiss proposed a scoring system which consists of nine criteria to aid in the diagnosis of adrenal cancer [10]. The presence of three or more of the nine features from the Weiss criteria is highly suggestive of ACC [11]. Our patient’s tu- mor demonstrated high nuclear grade, capsular invasion, less than 25% clear cells, diffuse growth pattern, and tumor ne- crosis (5/9 criteria); leading to the classification of the mass as ACC.

Adjuvant treatment with mitotane has been shown to be beneficial in patients with ACC [12]. Given that an R0 resection was achieved, and because of the very long his- tory suggesting a more indolent tumor, adjuvant therapy was not recommended in this case. Since the biological behav- ior of these tumors is often aggressive, and the development of local-regional recurrence and/or metastatic disease is not uncommon, hence long-term follow-up is important for all patients after treatment.

The existence of this malignant tumor for at least 18 years prior to resection is extremely unusual. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of ACC to be reported with a well-documented 18-year untreated interval prior to successful surgical resection.

Grant Support

None.

Financial Disclosures

None.

References

1. Ng L, Libertino JM. Adrenocortical carcinoma: diagno- sis, evaluation and treatment. J Urol. 2003;169(1):5-11.

2. Hsing AW, Nam JM, Co Chien HT, Mclaughlin JK, Fraumeni JF, Jr. Risk factors for adrenal cancer: an ex- ploratory study. Int J Cancer. 1996;65(4):432-436.

3. Allolio B, Fassnacht M. Clinical review: Adrenocorti- cal carcinoma: clinical update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(6):2027-2037.

4. Schteingart DE, Doherty GM, Gauger PG, Giordano TJ, Hammer GD, Korobkin M, Worden FP. Management of patients with adrenal cancer: recommendations of an in- ternational consensus conference. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12(3):667-680.

5. Lacroix A. Approach to the patient with adrenocortical car- cinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(11):4812-4822.

6. Dunnick NR, Korobkin M, Francis I. Adrenal radiology: distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(4):861-867.

7. Bilimoria KY, Shen WT, Elaraj D, Bentrem DJ, Win- chester DJ, Kebebew E, Sturgeon C. Adrenocortical car- cinoma in the United States: treatment utilization and prognostic factors. Cancer. 2008;113(11):3130-3136.

8. Wandoloski M, Bussey KJ, Demeure MJ. Adrenocorti- cal cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89(5):1255-1267.

9. Aiba M, Fujibayashi M. Histopathological diagnosis and prognostic factors in adrenocortical carcinoma. En-

docr Pathol. 2005;16(1):13-22.

10. Weiss LM. Comparative histologic study of 43 metasta- sizing and nonmetastasizing adrenocortical tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8(3):163-169.

11. Terzolo M, Angeli A, Fassnacht M, Daffara F, Tauch- manova L, Conton PA, Rossetto R, et al. Adjuvant mi- totane treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(23):2372-2380.