Open Access ☒ CrossMark
A novel FOXO1-mediated dedifferentiation blocking role for DKK3 in adrenocortical carcinogenesis
Joyce Y. Cheng1+, Taylor C. Brown1+, Timothy D. Murtha1, Adam Stenman3, C. Christofer Juhlin3,
Catharina Larsson3, James M. Healy1, Manju L. Prasad2, Wolfram T. Knoefel4, Andreas Krieg4, Ute I. Scholl5, Reju Korah1 and Tobias Carling1,6* (D
Abstract
Background: Dysregulated WNT signaling dominates adrenocortical malignancies. This study investigates whether silencing of the WNT negative regulator DKK3 (Dickkopf-related protein 3), an implicated adrenocortical differentiation marker and an established tumor suppressor in multiple cancers, allows dedifferentiation of the adrenal cortex.
Methods: We analyzed the expression and regulation of DKK3 in human adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) by qRT-PCR, immunofluorescence, promoter methylation assay, and copy number analysis. We also conducted functional studies on ACC cell lines, NCI-H295R and SW-13, using siRNAs and enforced DKK3 expression to test DKK3’s role in blocking dedifferentiation of adrenal cortex.
Results: While robust expression was observed in normal adrenal cortex, DKK3 was down-regulated in the majority (>75%) of adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) tested. Both genetic (gene copy loss) and epigenetic (promoter methylation) events were found to play significant roles in DKK3 down-regulation in ACCs. While NCI-H295R cells harboring ß-catenin activating mutations failed to respond to DKK3 silencing, SW-13 cells showed increased motility and reduced clonal growth. Conversely, exogenously added DKK3 also increased motility of SW-13 cells without influencing their growth. Enforced over-expression of DKK3 in SW-13 cells resulted in slower cell growth by an extension of G1 phase, promoted survival of microcolonies, and resulted in significant impairment of migratory and invasive behaviors, largely attributable to modified cell adhesions and adhesion kinetics. DKK3-over-expressing cells also showed increased expression of Forkhead Box Protein O1 (FOXO1) transcription factor, RNAi silencing of which partially restored the migratory proficiency of cells without interfering with their viability.
Conclusions: DKK3 suppression observed in ACCs and the effects of manipulation of DKK3 expression in ACC cell lines suggest a FOXO1-mediated differentiation-promoting role for DKK3 in the adrenal cortex, silencing of which may allow adrenocortical dedifferentiation and malignancy.
Keywords: DKK3, FOXO1, Adrenocortical carcinogenesis
* Correspondence: tobias.carling@yale.edu
+Equal contributors
1Department of Surgery & Yale Endocrine Neoplasia Laboratory, Yale
University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, FMB130A, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
☐ BioMed Central
Background
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare (0.5-2 cases per million/year) endocrine malignancy that carries a poor prognosis at diagnosis due to its propensity to metastasize before detection. Even with aggressive surgi- cal and oncologic therapy, the 5-year survival rate is an abysmal 16-38% [1-4]. A major reason for the lack of an effective targeted treatment strategy for ACCs is an inadequate understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of the disease [3, 4].
Genetic and epigenetic dysregulations of the WNT, p53, and IGF2 pathways appear to dominate various cancer- driving anomalies in the majority of ACCs [5-7]. Recent findings from comprehensive genetic analyses of ACCs confirmed a signature role for WNT dysregulation in the origin and/or progression of ACCs [4, 6, 8, 9]. Physiologic- ally, both canonical and non-canonical WNT signaling pathways play global and zone-specific roles in the devel- opment, differentiation, and homeostasis of the adrenal gland [10, 11]. In particular, endocrine homeostasis of the adrenal glomerulosa and fasciculata zones is largely controlled by WNT-differentiation signaling mediated by the Wnt4-Fz1/2-Dvl3-ß-Catenin-SF1 axis [12-16]. Regula- tory components of this proposed adrenal cortex-specific Wnt4 axis include the secretory factors, frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) and the putative tumor suppressor, DKK3 [14, 17, 18]. Aberrant WNT signaling has been well-established in the origin of many tumor types and is strongly associated with stabilization of ß-catenin in the cytoplasm and/or in the nucleus and constitutive activa- tion of WNT target genes [19, 20]. Similar stabilization and nuclear accumulation of ß-catenin is seen in benign ad- renocortical adenomas (ACAs) and frequently in malignant ACCs [10, 21]. However, only 10% of ACCs with constitu- tively active ß-catenin carry mutations in the ß-catenin gene (CTNNB1), suggesting alternate mechanisms of aberrant WNT activation, including dysregulation of WNT inhibi- tors such as Wif-1 [22]. Other WNT regulatory mutations found in ACCs include PRKAR1A [23] and recently identi- fied KREMEN1 and ZNRF3 gene deletions [8, 24].
Although implicated in zonal differentiation and hor- mone biosynthesis [14, 25], a definitive role for the ubiqui- tous WNT inhibitor DKK3 in promoting functional differentiation and/or blocking tumor dedifferentiation of the adrenal cortex has yet to be clarified. The inhibitory role of DKK3 in WNT signaling is context-dependent and appears to be influenced by a repertoire of cell surface re- ceptors and co-expressed ligands [26]. DKK3, a 38 kDa se- creted glycoprotein with an N-terminal signal peptide, is also implicated in eliciting distinct intracellular roles in addition to its secretory functions [27]. Reduced DKK3 ex- pression is observed in a variety of solid tumors, and re- expression studies in multiple cancer cell types mostly re- sulted in cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis, strongly
suggesting a global tumor suppressor role for this WNT regulator (reviewed in [26]). Furthermore, ectopic expression of DKK3 in a variety of cancer cell types stifled aggressive malignant behavior, reversed epithelial- mesenchymal transition (EMT), and impaired cell motility, pointing towards a comprehensive dedifferentiation- blocking role for DKK3 [28, 29]. This study investigates a potential tumor suppressor role for the implicated adrenal differentiation factor DKK3 in blocking dedifferentiation of adrenocortical cells.
Methods
Tissue acquisition
Written informed consent was obtained from patients prior to surgical resection of adrenal tissue according to protocols approved by Institutional Review Boards at (a) Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, (b) Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, and (c) Karo- linska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Tissue samples were flash-frozen (FF) in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 ℃ until processed for study. Specimens displaying unequivo- cal histopathological characteristics of ACCs (n = 38) and histologically normal adrenal tissue (n = 14) samples ex- cised with ACAs were selected for study. Consecutive un- stained/hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained 5 uM sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sam- ples underwent immunohistochemistry analyses. All sam- ples were histopathologically confirmed by experienced endocrine pathologists before processing.
DNA, RNA, and protein preparation
Genomic DNA and total RNA were isolated from FF sam- ples using AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein Mini Kit (Qiagen) as per manufacturer’s recommendations. Quantity and quality of prepared nucleic acids were assessed by spectro- photometry (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc.). Total protein from cultured cells was extracted using Laemmli buffer (BioRad) as cell lysis buffer; protein concentrations were quantified using Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo- Fisher Scientific) and GloMax multidetection system (Pro- mega), as per manufacturer’s instructions.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA (100 ng) was reverse transcribed using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) as per manufacturer’s in- structions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was per- formed in triplicate using TaqMan PCR master mix with FAM fluorophore and probe/primer pairs specific to hu- man DKK3 (Hs00951307_m1), FOXO1 (Hs01054576_m1), and RPLP0 (Hs99999902_m1) (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s cycling conditions using CFX96 thermal cyclers (Bio-Rad). Gene expression levels were normalized to mean RPLP0 expression levels. Relative gene expression values were calculated using recommended
Livak method (Bio-Rad). Fold-change expression values were calculated by base-two logarithmic transformations of relative gene expression values.
For pathway-focused gene expression analysis, (a) RT2 Profile PCR Array Human WNT Signaling Pathway and (b) RT2 Profiler PCR Array Human Transcription Factors were used according to protocol outlined in RT2 Profiler PCR Array Handbook (Qiagen). Briefly, 100 ng of DNA- free RNA from each sample was used for 84 target genes listed in gene lists (available at www.qiagen.com) using 96-well RT2 profiler array format D. cDNA was prepared using RT2 first strand kit and amplified using RT2 SYBR Green Mastermix (both from Qiagen) using CFX96 ther- mal cycler. Differential expression of target genes was cal- culated using AACT method on data web portal at www.SABiosciences.com/pcrarraydataanalysis.php.
Methylation-specific PCR
Methylation status of CpG island A of DKK3 promoter (Chr11:12029737-12030841) was assessed by MethylScreen technology using EpiTect Methyl II PCR Assay (Qiagen) as previously described [30]. Briefly, 125 ng of genomic DNA was mock-digested or digested with methylation-sensitive and methylation-dependent restriction enzymes individu- ally or together, and methylation status of target DNA se- quence was measured using qRT-PCR with probes specific to target DKK3 promoter sequence. CT values were con- verted into percentages of unmethylated, intermediate- methylated, and hypermethylated CpG values using a quan- titation algorithm from EpiTect Methyl II PCR Assay Handbook (Qiagen). Tissue samples were designated as hypermethylated (>5% alleles with hypermethylation), intermediate-methylated (>5% alleles with intermediate methylation), or unmethylated (no methylation detected).
DNA copy number analysis (CNA) by qRT-PCR
DNA from 27 ACC samples that passed specified test quality criteria were analyzed in quadruplicate with TaqMan Copy Number Assay using a primer / probe pair specific to target gene DKK3 or housekeeping gene RPPH1. Normal adrenal tissue was used for diploid (2n) reference. Copy numbers were predicted using CopyCaller software v2.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific). TaqMan Copy Number Assay used was Hs00228043_cn. Target gene DKK3 located on Chr.11:11989984 on NCBI build 37. Housekeeping gene Ribonuclease P RNA Component H1, RPPH1 located on Chr.14:20811565 on NCBI build 37.
Immunofluorescence (IF) detection of proteins
Five M-thick FFPE sections were processed for im- munofluorescence detection of DKK3 and ß-catenin proteins as described previously [31]. Goat anti-DKK3 polyclonal (SC14959; 1:100 dilution) or mouse anti-ß ca- tenin monoclonal (SC47778; 1:200 dilution) primary
antibodies and anti-goat FITC (fluorescein isothiocyan- ate) and anti-mouse TR (Texas Red) secondary anti- bodies (1:1000) were used, followed by Ultracruz mounting agent containing 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylin- dole (DAPI) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for indirect immunodetection. A Zeiss AX10 confocal microscope with AxioVision 4.8 program was used for IF analysis, and photomicrographs were taken at a total magnification of 100x or 400x, as noted.
Cell culture, expression vectors, transfections, and western blot detection
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)-authenticated human ACC cell lines SW-13 (CCL-105) and NCI-H295R (CRL-2128) were maintained in growth conditions recom- mended by ATCC, as reported previously [31]. For DKK3 treatments, a working concentration of 5 µg/mL (in PBS) of human recombinant DKK3 (R&D Systems) was used. RNAi silencing was carried out with 3 unique 27-mer siRNA duplexes (designated siA, siB, and siC) targeting DKK3 (Human) and FOXO1 (Human) transcripts. Univer- sal scrambled negative control siRNA was used as non- specific control (all from Origene). Lipofectamine2000- mediated transfection was carried out in Opti-MEM ac- cording to manufacturer’s recommendations (Thermo- Fisher Scientific) in 6-well plates with starting densities of 50,000 cells/well for SW-13 and 80,000 cells/well for NCI- H295R. Transfection medium was replaced with regular growth medium after 24 h of transfection. Cells were lysed for RNA extraction (after 24 h) or protein extraction (after 48 h), and assays were done 48 h post-transfection.
Myc-DDK tagged pCMV6-Entry, pCMV6-Entry/GFP, and pCMV6-Entry/DKK3 plasmid vectors (Origene) were used for transient and stable expression. Transient transfec- tion was carried out in Opti-MEM medium using Lipofec- tamine2000 according to manufacturer’s recommendations (ThermoFisher Scientific) in 6-well plates with starting densities of 50,000 cells/well for SW-13 and 80,000 cells/ well for NCI-H295R cells. Cells were transfected one day after plating. Transfection medium was replaced with ap- propriate growth medium 6 h post-transfection, and cells were assayed for cell behaviors 24 h post-transfection. Total cell numbers and viability were calculated by staining cells with 0.4% Trypan Blue (ThermoFisher Scientific) and counting with hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific Co.). Ex- periments were performed in triplicate, and parallel pCMV6-Entry/GFP transfections were used to determine transfection efficiency.
Stable Geneticin (G418)-resistant pCMV6-Entry, pCMV6-Entry/GFP, and pCMV6-Entry/DKK3 transfected clones were selected in 800 µg/mL G418-containing growth medium (ThermoFisher Scientific). Multiple clones were then pooled into populations to avoid expression variability and selection bias between clones. Established populations
designated SW-Neo (from pCMV6-Entry transfections) and SW-DKK3 (expressing Myc-DDK/DKK3) were com- pared to parental SW-13 cells to determine effects of con- stitutive DKK3 expression on SW-13 cells’ malignant properties. Constitutive DKK3 expression was confirmed via qRT-PCR using TaqMan primer/probe pairs (Thermo- Fisher Scientific) and Western blotting using anti-DKK3 mAb (1:500; Abcam), anti-mouse-HRP (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Inc.), Mini-PROTEAN TGX gel, PVDF blotting membrane (Bio-Rad), and enhanced chemilumin- escence (ECL) detection reagents (ThermoFisher Scientific) as per manufacturer’s protocols. Unless specified, 100 µg protein was loaded per well of 4-10% SDS gels (Bio-Rad). Equal protein loading was confirmed by staining PVDF membranes with GelCode Blue Safe Protein stain (Thermo- Fisher Scientific) after chemiluminescence detection.
Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle
SW-13, SW-Neo, and SW-DKK3 cells were fixed in cold 70% ethanol for 30 min at 4 ℃, washed twice with PBS, treated with ribonuclease (100 µg/mL), and stained with propidium iodide (PI; 50 µg/mL in PBS). Using bandpass filter 605 nm (for PI), forward and side scatter were measured in a BD LSRII Flowcytometer. Pulse process- ing was used to exclude cell doublets from the analysis. FlowJo software was used to analyze the best Gaussian distribution curve to each peak for the cell populations of G0-G1 and G2-M.
Cell invasion, migration, adhesion, and clonogenic growth assays
To assess invasive proficiencies, 100,000 SW-13, SW-Neo, or SW-DKK3 cells were allowed to invade through Matri- gel from upper chambers containing serum-free medium to lower chambers containing 10% FBS medium in BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chambers (BD Biosciences). After 24 h, Matrigel was removed, and invaded cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS (10 min), stained with 0.05% crystal violet (30 min), and counted at 100X magni- fication with light microscope. Matrigel invasion assay was performed twice in triplicate chambers. In migration assays, 100,000 cells were allowed to migrate through 8 µM-pore size modified Boyden Chambers (BD Biosci- ences) from upper chambers containing serum-free medium to lower chamber with 10% FBS medium. After 4 or 8 h, cells that migrated to lower side of the membrane were fixed, stained, and counted as above.
Cell adhesion assays were carried out in 6-well plates. One hundred thousand cells were seeded per well, allowed to grow overnight, washed with warm PBS, and incubated with 0.5 mL of 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA for 1 min; Trypsin- EDTA was then removed, plates were tapped gently to re- move loosely attached cells, cells were washed with 10% FBS medium, fixed, stained and counted as above. For
clonogenic growth assays, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at low densities (5,000 cells/well) and allowed to grow 7 days in appropriate growth medium (SW-Neo and SW-DKK3) with medium change every 3 days. On day 7, cells were washed with PBS, fixed, and stained as above. Colonies with 12 ± 2 or 4 + 2 cells were counted as separ- ate groups and averaged from 6 wells. Experiments were repeated 3 times, and data from a representative experi- ment is presented.
Statistical analysis
Normal distribution of continuous variables was assessed using D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus tests. Normally distributed variables were analyzed using 2-tailed t test; Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally dis- tributed variables. For variables with greater than 2 dependent values, a 1-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for normally and non- normally distributed populations, respectively. Matched continuous variables were compared using Pearson cor- relation. Survival data were assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods, and differences were compared by Mantel-Cox test. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software).
Results
Reduced expression of DKK3 in adrenocortical carcinoma
Recent comprehensive genetic analyses identified WNT signaling as the most common target of genetic aberra- tions in ACCs. To identify novel WNT targets, we com- pared the expression pattern of selected positive and negative WNT regulators in 7 ACC samples using an ex- panded WNT expression array. Among various differen- tially expressed WNT regulators, the expression of DKK3, a negative WNT regulator and a putative tumor suppres- sor in a wide variety of tumors, was found significantly re- duced in the majority (6/7) of the ACC samples tested (Fig. 1a; Additional file 1: Figure S1). Further, compared to the robust expression pattern in adrenal cortex, DKK3 protein expression was found to be nearly absent in ACCs by indirect immunofluorescence analysis (Fig. 1b; a&h). DKK3 was observed to be expressed in the zona fascicu- lata and zona reticularis (data not shown) in normal ad- renal cortex, though to a lesser extent going inward from the zona glomerulosa (Fig. 1b). In contrast to the near ab- sence of DKK3, ß-catenin appeared to be over-expressed in ACC (Fig. 1b; h). Moreover, both robustly expressed DKK3 and weakly expressed ß-catenin proteins were found predominantly in the cytoplasmic compartment of normal adrenal cortex (Fig. 1b; b-g), while increased ß- catenin levels were found both in the cytoplasm and the nuclei of ACC cells (Fig. 1b; i-n). Due to the rarity of the disease and scarcity of fresh-frozen samples, an inter- national patient cohort (n = 38) was assembled for DKK3
A
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5a
T5b
T6
T7
N1
N2
N3
Magnitude of gene expression
min
avg
max
B
a
b
C
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
I
m
n
C
D
10-
5
Fold Change Gene Expression
Fold Change Gene Expression
*
5
0
0
-5
-5.
-10
15
11
3
43
7
75
37
47
13.
63
17-
45
65
29
53-
21
41
35-
19 25
57
1.
5
31- 39-
77 69
49
23
33-
59.
27
55
51-
61-
73-
71-
-10
Normal (n=14)
ACC (n=37)
Sample ID
+ p <0.01
expression analysis (Table 1). Quantitative RT-PCR ana- lysis of 37 ACC samples confirmed reduced mRNA ex- pression in the majority (70%; 26/37) of ACC samples (Fig. 1c). The mean expression of DKK3 in 37 ACCs was significantly decreased (p=0.002) compared to mean DKK3 expression in 14 normal adrenal tissue samples (Fig. 1d). The high frequency of DKK3 silencing (70%) observed in ACCs is very similar to that observed in other malignancies including thyroid [32] and pancreatic cancers [33].
To determine whether reduced DKK3 expression corre- lated with disease presentation and/or outcome, we ana- lyzed statistical correlation to various patient characteristics (Table 1), including age, gender, tumor size, tumor weight, ENSAT stage, and hormone secretion phenotypes. Despite the limited cohort size (n = 38), reduced DKK3 expression showed a non-significant trend (p = 0.062) towards female gender (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also did not reveal a significant effect on survival in
patients with reduced DKK3 expression (p=0.19) (Additional file 1: Figure S3).
DKK3 promoter methylation and gene copy number alterations in ACC
Promoter methylation has been identified as the principal mechanism of DKK3 silencing in multiple tumor types [34-39]. Moreover, we have previously shown potential involvement of global and gene-specific promoter methy- lation changes in ACCs [40]. Using the EpiTect protocol [31], we analyzed methylation status of the DKK3 pro- moter in 9 normal adrenal tissue and 29 ACC samples. Compared to the DKK3 promoter methylation status in normal adrenal DNA, 4 ACC samples (14%) showed marked levels of hypermethylation, and 14 samples (48%) showed intermediate-range methylation (Table 2). Twelve of 18 ACC samples with hyper- or intermediate promoter methylation (67%) also showed significant reduction in DKK3 expression, concurring with the established role of
| characteristics | gene copy number | alterations in | adrenocortical carcinoma | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Number of Cases | Percentage | Sample | Gene Expression | Promoter | Methylation | Gene Copy Number | |
| Total Number | 38 | NA | 1 | L | IM | 2 | ||
| Gender | 3 | L | HM | 2 | ||||
| Male | 14 | 35.8% | 5 | L | HM | 2 | ||
| Female | 24 | 63.2% | 7 | L | UM | 1 | ||
| Age ± SD (y) | 57.7 ±13.2 | NA | 11 | L | UM | 1 | ||
| Cohort | 13 | L | UM | 2 | ||||
| Yale | 10 | 26.3% | 15 | L | UM | ND | ||
| Karolinska | 25 | 65.8% | 17 | L | UM | 1 | ||
| Düsseldorf | 3 | 7.9% | 19 | L | HM | 1 | ||
| Tumor Size (cm) | 21 | L | IM | 2 | ||||
| Mean ± SD | 12.8 ±4.4 | NA | 25 | L | IM | 2 | ||
| Range | 5.5-21.0 | NA | 29 | L | IM | 1 | ||
| ENSAT 2008 Stage | 31 | L | IM | 2 | ||||
| I | 0 | 0.0% | 35 | L | ND | ND | ||
| II | 18 | 47.4% | 37 | L | ND | ND | ||
| III | 11 | 28.9% | 39 | L | ND | ND | ||
| IV | 9 | 23.7% | 41 | L | IM | 2 | ||
| Hormone Hypersecretion | 43 | L | ND | ND | ||||
| Aldosterone | 1 | 2.6% | 45 | L | UM | ND | ||
| Cortisol | 9 | 23.7% | 47 | L | IM | 1 | ||
| Androgen/DHEA | 4 | 10.5% | 53 | L | IM | 1 | ||
| Estrogen | 1 | 2.6% | 57 | L | HM | 6 | ||
| Multi-secretingª | 5 | 13.2% | 63 | L | UM | 2 | ||
| Non-functional | 14 | 36.8% | 65 | L | UM | 3 | ||
| No information available | 4 | 10.5% | 75 | L | ND | ND | ||
| Outcome | 77 | L | ND | ND | ||||
| Alive, no recurrence | 11 | 28.9% | 9 | ND | IM | 2 | ||
| Alive, recurrence | 5 | 13.2% | 23 | N | UM | 2 | ||
| Death from disease | 16 | 42.1% | 33 | N | IM | 2 | ||
| Death from other causes | 4 | 10.5% | 49 | N | IM | 2 | ||
| Lost to follow-up | 2 | 5.3% | 71 | N | ND | ND | ||
| ªTumors secreting two or more of | the following hormones: | aldosterone, | 27 | H | IM | 1 | ||
| cortisol, testosterone, or DHEA | ||||||||
| y years, cm centimeter, SD standard | deviation, ENSAT European | Network for | 51 | H | IM | 3 | ||
| the Study of Adrenal Tumors, DHEA not applicable | dehydroepiandrosterone, | NA | 55 | H | IM | 1 | ||
| 59 | H | UM | 2 | |||||
| promoter methylation in | DKK3 silencing in | other tumors | 61 | H | UM | 2 | ||
| [36, 37]. Interestingly, | 8/11 samples with | non-methylated | 69 | H | ND | ND | ||
| promoters also showed | comparable frequency | of DKK3 si- | 73 | H | ND | ND | ||
| lencing (72%), suggesting | alternate mechanisms | for DKK3 | Abbreviations: | DKK3 Dickkopf-related | protein | 3, L low | expression, N normal | |
expression, H high expression, UM unmethylated, IM intermediate methylation, HM hypermethylation, ND not determined
down-regulation in ACC.
Recent genetic analyses of ACCs by us and others have shown significant copy number alterations in genes po- tentially involved in various signaling pathways [30]. To determine if gene copy loss contributed to reduced ex- pression of DKK3 in this cohort of ACC samples, we
analyzed copy number variations using the TaqMan copy number assay. We found copy losses in 9 samples (33%) and copy gains in 3 of 27 ACC samples tested (Table 2;
Additional file 1: Figure S4). Seven of the 9 samples with copy loss (78%) showed marked reduction in DKK3 ex- pression; 4 showed concurrent DKK3 promoter methyla- tion. Interestingly, one ACC sample (ID #57) with 6 copies of the DKK3 gene also showed promoter hyper- methylation and reduced expression of DKK3.
DKK3 silencing reduces clonogenic growth and promotes migration of ACC cells
To test whether DKK3 plays a tumor suppressor role in ACC in vitro, we investigated the expression pattern and regulation of DKK3 in two ACC cell lines, SW-13 and NCI- H295R. Western blot analysis showed modest expression of DKK3 in SW13 cells, while NCI-H295R cells showed low expression (Fig. 2a). Despite carrying TP53 gene mutations, non-hormone-secreting SW-13 cells maintain an
unperturbed and modifiable WNT signaling pathway, whereas the adrenal hormone-producing NCI-H295R cells harbor CTNNB1 and axin1 mutations, resulting in consti- tutive WNT activation [31, 41]. To test whether suppressing endogenous DKK3 will influence malignant properties of ACC cells, we used a transient siRNA-silencing method. Si- lencing of DKK3 expression in SW-13 (Fig. 2b, d) and NCI- H295R (Fig. 2c) cells with siRNA was confirmed by qRT- PCR (Fig. 2b-c) and Western blot (Fig. 2d). DKK3 silencing did not result in significant loss of viability in either cell type for the duration of study (48 h). Due to low baseline levels of DKK3 in H295R (Fig. 2a), siRNA-mediated silencing has no detectable effect observable by Western (data not shown). Next, we examined whether silencing of DKK3 modulates clonal growth or migratory potential of ACC cells. Partial silencing (40% suppression; Fig. 2c) of DKK3
A
B
C
D
1.20
SW13
1.20
H295R
1.00
1.00
Relative Expression
0.80
Relative Expression
0.80
0.60
0.60
DKK3
DKK3
0.40
0.40
1
2
3
4
5
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
SW13
H295R
Scrmbl-si
DKK3-si
Scrmbl-si
DKK3-si
E
F
G
H
4100
H295R
350
H295R
1000
SW13
120
SW13
*
3600
900
300
# of cells migrated in 12 hours
800
100
Clones with 12 ± 2 cells
3100
# of cells migrated in 4 hours
250
Clones with 12 ± 2 cells
700
2600
80
200
600
2100
500
60
150
1600
400
300
40
1100
100
200
600
50
*
20
100
100
0
Lipo
S-ive
DKK3
Lipo
S-ive
DKK3
0
0
Lipo
S-ive
DKK3
Lipo
S-ive
DKK3
*p=0.001
*p=0.001
(Fig. 2a) did not appear to influence clonogenic growth or migratory potentials of NCI-H295R cells (Fig. 2e-f). It is conceivable that the constitutively active WNT signaling in these cells may have conferred inherent resistance to DKK3 signaling. On the other hand, DKK3 silencing in SW-13 cells (75% suppression; Fig. 2b; lane 5 of Fig. 2d) signifi- cantly impaired the cells’ ability to form colonies in isolation (p=0.001) (Fig. 2g) and promoted their motility behavior (p =0.001) (Fig. 2h; Additional file 1: Figure S7). These re- sults suggest a potential role for DKK3 silencing in adrenal carcinogenesis, which could be overrun by gain-of-function WNT mutations.
Exogenous DKK3 promotes migration of SW-13 cells
Reports suggesting distinct roles for endogenous and se- creted DKK3s in cell behavior [17, 42] prompted us to test the effect of exogenous DKK3 addition to ACC cells. Cells grown in the presence of exogenous human recombinant DKK3 did not show a difference in their overall growth potentials (Additional file 1: Figure S5). However, migra- tory potential of SW-13 cells was found to be accentuated with exogenous DKK3 (Fig. 3a). The exogenous DKK3 in this instance appears to have a dominant effect over the motility-impeding effect of endogenous DKK3 (Fig. 3a & f). NCI-H295R cells with constitutively active ß-catenin appeared to be resistant (Fig. 3a) to the exogenous DKK3- induced migration-promoting effects on SW-13 cells.
Constitutive over-expression of DKK3 stifles malignant behavior of ACC cells
DKK3 is constitutively expressed and persistently present during zonal differentiation of adrenal cortex [14]. To test whether constitutive over-expression of DKK3 promotes redifferentiation of ACC cells, we generated a stable popu- lation of SW-13 cells engineered to over-express DKK3. Since NCI-H295R cells exhibited no appreciable response to either endogenous or exogenous DKK3 (Figs. 2e-f and 3a), we limited our attention to SW-13 cells. Expression of ectopic DKK3 was confirmed (Fig. 3b), and SW-DKK3 cells were assessed for various malignant properties com- pared to parental SW-13 and control SW-Neo cells.
SW-DKK3 cells grew at a slower rate compared to both parental SW-13 and SW-Neo cells (Fig. 3c). The slow rate of growth of SW-DKK3 cells was found to be caused by an increase in the percentage of cells accumulated in G1 phase (47.5% SW-Neo compared to 56.3% SW-DKK3 cells) of the cell cycle (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Since suppression of endogenous DKK3 expression resulted in reduced clonogenic growth and increased motility of SW- 13 cells, we compared clonal growth and migratory poten- tial of SW-DKK3 cells to that of SW-Neo cells, using parental SW-13 cells as reference. Compared to their vector-transfected controls, SW-DKK3 cells showed an overall increase in clonal growth efficiency (Fig. 3d).
Interestingly, 52% of the clones were small (4 ±2 cells) and composed of larger, slow-growing, or growth-arrested cells (Fig. 3e; right). In SW-Neo, this fraction of small clones represented only 9% of the clones (p < 0.001), while the remaining 91% constituted large colonies comprised of 12 ± 2 cells (Fig. 3e; left).
Next, we assessed the effect of constitutive DKK3 over-expression on migratory potential of SW-13 cells. SW-DKK3 cells exhibited significantly decreased migra- tory potential compared to parental SW13 and SW-Neo cells (p<0.001) (Fig. 3f). To test whether DKK3- promoted reduction in SW-13 cells’ migratory potential has a potential in vivo implication, we performed an in vitro invasion assay. As reported previously in other can- cer types [26], over-expression of DKK3 significantly im- paired SW-13 cells’ ability to invade through reconstituted matrix (p <0.001) (Fig. 3g).
DKK3 promotes a more differentiated phenotype in ACC cells
To test whether decreased invasive behavior of DKK3- over-expressing SW-DKK3 cells is due to signaling changes that can potentially modulate cell spreading and thereby migration kinetics, cell morphology was ob- served under light microscopy. SW-DKK3 cells appeared to be larger with an extensive spreading phenotype aided by dysregulated cell edge attachments (Fig. 4a-c). While the parental SW-13 and SW-Neo cells displayed a sig- nificantly higher number of filopodia in a planar orienta- tion, SW-DKK3 cells displayed a significantly higher proportion of lobopodial extensions (p <0.01) (Fig. 4a- d). To test whether the differential expression of cell extensions alters cell attachment characteristics, we per- formed a cell-detachment assay. SW-DKK3 cells showed a significantly stronger attachment to substratum com- pared to both SW-13 and SW-Neo cells (p<0.01) (Fig. 4e). Whether increased attachment strength to sub- stratum or multidirectional polarity conferred by the multitude of lobopodial attachments acts independently or in tandem towards reduced invasive behavior of SW- DKK3 cells needs to be studied further.
FOXO1 as a potential DKK3 target to effect redifferentiation
Towards understanding the potential transcriptional modu- lation of cell adhesion and motility by DKK3 over- expression, we compared global difference in the expression pattern of 84 transcription factors using an expanded tran- scription array. Relative expression of 3 transcription factors, ID1, JUN, and FOXO1, consistently demonstrated >4-fold difference in expression between SW-DKK3 and SW-Neo/SW-13 cells (Additional file 1: Figure S8 A&B). Transcription factors ID1 and JUN have been shown to me- diate a variety of phenotypic effects, including apoptosis via
A
B
C
2.5
500
Fold Increase in Cell Migration
450
… SW-13 — SW-Neo — SW-DKK3
2.0
.
Number of viable cells x 10
400
350
1.5
Myc-ddk/DKK3
300
1.0
DKK3
250
200
:
0.5
150
100
0.0
SWIN-
SW/N+
SW/D- SW/D+
295-
295+
50
1
2
3
0
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Number of days in culture
D
E
F
G
4000
**
3500
# of cells migrated in 4 hours
160
Total number of clones
# of cells invaded in 24 hours
60
140
3000
50
120
40
2500
100
80
*
30
2000
60
20
1500
40
*
100 um
3
100 μm
20
10
*
1000
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
0
SW-13
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
0
SW-13
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
500
*
p <0.001
0
*p <0.001
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
12 ± 2 cells
= 4 ± 2 cells
*p <0.01; ** p <0.001
Fig. 3 ACC cells were either treated with exogenous recombinant DKK3 (a) or enforced to express Myc-DDK tagged DKK3 (b) and assayed for cell behaviors. a SW-13 N/D (left) or NCI-H295R (right) cells were untreated (SW N/D-, 295-) or treated (SW N/D+, 295+) with exogenous DKK3 for 24 h and allowed to migrate through modified Boyden chamber for 4 h. Cells migrating to lower surface were fixed, stained, and counted. b Western immunoblot detection of endogenous DKK3 and ectopically expressed DKK3 (Myc-DDK/DKK3) in vector control (lane 1), SW-DKK3 (lane 2), or Myc-DDK/GFP control (lane 3) cells. c SW-13, SW-Neo, and SW-DKK3 cells plated in 24-well plates (5000 cells/well) were grown 8 days. Quadruplicate wells from each cell type were trypsinized, incubated in 0.2% Trypan blue, and viable cells were counted using hemocytometer. Data shown represent one of three independent experiments. d and e, Five thousand SW-13 or SW-DKK3 cells plated in 6-well plates were allowed to grow 7 days; clones were fixed, stained, and enumerated into 2 classes of (a) 12± 2 cells (filled light grey) and (b) 4+2 cells (filled black). Majority of clones formed from SW-Neo cells were large (e; left), while SW-DKK3 cells produced a significant number of small colonies (4± 2) comprised of large cells (e; right). f One hundred thousand SW-13, SW-Neo, and SW-DKK3 cells were allowed to migrate through modified Boyden chamber for 4 h; cells that migrated to the lower side of the membrane were fixed, stained, and counted. g One hundred thousand SW-13, SW-Neo, and SW-DKK3 cells were allowed to invade through Matrigel in modified Boyden chambers for 24 h. Cells that invaded through Matrigel and migrated to the lower side of the membrane were fixed, stained, and counted
DKK3 signaling, in multiple cancers (44, 45). DKK3-stifled invasive behavior independent of loss of viability observed in SW-13 cells prompted us to investigate a potentially novel role for FOXO1 transcription factor in DKK3- promoted redifferentiation of ACCs. Increased expression of FOXO1 in SW-DKK3 cells was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Additional file 1: Figure S8C). Using siRNA, we transiently silenced FOXO1 expression in SW-DKK3 and control SW- Neo cells (Additional file 1: Figure S9A&B) and assessed the effect of silencing on cell motility. Irrespective of DKK3 expression (Fig. 3b), both cell types showed an increase in migratory potential upon FOXO1 silencing (Fig. 5). The
magnitude of relief in migratory inhibition was found to be more pronounced in SW-DKK3 cells (45% increase in mo- tility with 43% FOXO1 suppression) than in SW-Neo cells (30% increase in motility with 66% FOXO1 suppression; Additional file 1: Figure S10). These results clearly suggest a role for FOXO1 in mediating DKK3-promoted redifferen- tiation and/or anti-invasive signaling in SW-13 ACC cells.
Discussion
DKK3 expression is down-regulated in many human cancers, including that of the thyroid, lung, prostate, colon, breast, and liver [32, 33, 36, 43], but its
A
B
C
100 um
100 um
A
100 um
SW-13
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
D
- Lamellipodia
Filopodia
20
Lobopodia
18
E
16
25000
Average number of extensions/cell
SW-13
14
20000
**
# of cells remaining attached
SW-Neo
12
15000
SW-DKK3
**
10
**
*
10000
8
*
6
5000
**
õ
4
*
0
2
1
2
3
5
10
15
Time (minutes)
0
*p=0.01; ** p=0.001
SW-13
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
Lamellipodia
Filopodia
Lobopodia
*p <0.01
Fig. 4 Constitutive over-expression of DKK3 reorganizes cellular extensions and cell spreading. a-c SW-13 (a), SW-Neo (b), and SW-DKK3 (c) cells were grown on glass cover-slips, fixed, stained, and photographed. SW-13 and SW-Neo cells show a predominance of filopodia (red arrowheads) around edges; SW-DKK3 shows more lobopodia (small green arcs), absence of lamellipodia (blue arc), and few filopodia around edges. While cells in a and b appear to be polarized with filopodia at leading edge and lamellipodia at lagging edge, SW-DKK3 cells (c) show evenly spread flat lobopodia with extensive spreading and absence of polarity. Photomicrographs are taken using light microscope at 400x magnification. d Average number of lamellipodia, filopodia, and lobopodia per cell calculated from manual counting of cell extensions. Twenty randomly taken (400x magnification) photomicrographs of SW-13, SW-Neo, and SW-DKK cells used for quantification. e One hundred thousand SW-13, SW-Neo, and SW-DKK3 cells/well of 6-well plates were allowed to grow overnight, detached at specified times, cells remaining attached were fixed, stained, and counted manually
regulation in ACC is unclear. In this study, we uti- lized comprehensive genetic, epigenetic, and func- tional approaches to identify and characterize a potential tumor suppressor role for DKK3 in adrenal carcinogenesis. Our study showed a significant de- crease in DKK3 expression in 70% (25/37) of ACCs, strongly suggesting a tumor suppressor role for DKK3 in human adrenal tissue. Whether the observed silen- cing in malignant samples represents an earlier dedif- ferentiation or a later malignancy-promoting event needs to be determined. Despite the relatively small cohort size, this study did not find an association be- tween DKK3 silencing and prognosis, unlike in gastric cancer [35]. Of note, the majority of this cohort of ACCs was previously shown not to harbor mutations in DKK3 or FOXO1 genes while <10% carried beta- catenin mutations [24].
Epigenetic modifications, including promoter methyla- tion and chromatin condensation, have been proposed as major DKK3 silencing mechanisms in a variety of tu- mors [43]. This study also supports a role for promoter hypermethylation in DKK3 silencing in ACCs. Interest- ingly, DKK3 expression was also significantly decreased in many samples with intermediate methylation (48%), suggesting that even intermediate levels of methylation may be adequate to silence DKK3 expression. Whether the DKK3 promoter methylation observed in this study is a component of the global methylation changes ob- served in ACCs [9, 40] or a specific DKK3 gene-targeted event needs to be clarified. A large proportion of the ACC study cohort with non-methylated promoters but with reduced DKK3 expression led us to seek alternate mechanisms for DKK3 down-regulation in ACC. In light of recent findings that gene copy number variations may
180
-Cells Migrated
450
Foxo1 Expression
160
400
140
350
Relative # of cells migrated
Relative Foxo1 Expression
120
300
100
250
80
200
60
150
40
100
20
50
0
0
Neg.
Si-RNA
Neg.
Si-RNA
SW-Neo
SW-DKK3
*p=0.01
contribute to adrenocortical carcinogenesis [8, 24], we analyzed a portion of our samples for DKK3 gene copy number variations. The majority of samples identified with DKK3 copy loss also had significantly reduced DKK3 expression. Only a handful of these samples had concurrent promoter methylation, indicating a possible independent role for gene copy loss in causing DKK3 down-regulation in ACC. One ACC sample with 6 cop- ies of DKK3 and a hypermethylated promoter had sig- nificantly reduced expression of DKK3, suggesting that copy number variations may occur earlier in ACC onco- genesis than gene-specific methylation events.
Statistical correlation to patient characteristics and out- comes did not reveal any prognostic association of reduced DKK3 expression in ACC patients, although reduced DKK3 expression was found to trend non-significantly to- ward female gender. This study did not reveal a relationship between DKK3 expression and aldosterone biosynthesis, as reported earlier [25]. In addition, no significant correlation was observed in our tumor cohort between DKK3 expres- sion, metastasis, and tumor grade.
We used functional approaches to characterize the ef- fects of DKK3 on human ACC cells. Silencing of DKK3 in SW13, a human ACC cell line with intact and induc- tile WNT signaling and endogenously expresses DKK3,
did not affect growth or viability of cells but resulted in reduced clonogenic growth and increased motility, con- sistent with a tumor suppressor role for DKK3 [31, 41]. In contrast, exogenous addition of DKK3 to SW-13 cells resulted in increased motility, suggesting distinct roles for intracellular and secreted DKK3s. This observation is consistent with recent suggestions that DKK3 potentially has distinct intracellular signaling partners independent of canonical WNT-B-catenin circuitry [26]. Overall, intracellular DKK3 appears to confer a more differenti- ated phenotype to SW-13 cells. Whether the observed DKK3-promoted more differentiated phenotype is through (a) reactivation of the proposed adrenocortical differentiation pathway [14], (b) blocking of malignancy signaling networks, or (c) activation of a novel rediffer- entiation pathway needs to be clarified.
Light microscopic analysis revealed drastic changes in organization of cell outgrowths on the edges of slow- moving SW-DKK3 cells. While parental SW-13 and SW- Neo cells produced an overwhelming number of dynamic filopodia that confer polarity and promote directional movement (41-43), SW-DKK3 cells showed predomin- antly lobopodia, indicative of multipolar spreading and hence arrested motility [44-46]. Although DKK3 has pre- viously been shown to influence migratory and invasive phenotypes in multiple cancer cell types, an association of cell surface modifications that can impact cell mobility has not been shown. The mechanism(s) that elicit the ob- served changes in cell extension repertoire need to be in- vestigated further. The association of the dedifferentiated phenotype and loss of DKK3 expression in ACC, com- bined with the re-acquisition of a relatively more differen- tiated phenotype in SW-13 ACC cells overexpressing DKK3, suggest a global differentiation role for DKK3 in adrenal cortex and the possibility that DKK3 could serve as a re-differentiation therapeutic target.
To explore potential pathways involved in eliciting the observed DKK3-promoted redifferentiated phenotype of ACC cells, we compared the expression pattern of 84 hu- man transcription factors. Of the 3 transcription factors found to be over-expressed in SW-DKK3 cells (ID1, JUN and FOXO1), FOXO1 secured our immediate attention for 3 primary reasons: (1) FOXO1 is known to promote func- tional differentiation of myofibroblasts [47], (2) FOXO1 in- hibits osteosarcoma malignancy via WNT inhibition [48], and (3) FOXO1 transcription has been suggested in re- sponse to steroid hormones [49]. We hypothesized that intracellular DKK3 promotes cellular differentiation signal- ing encompassing cellular spreading and stifled motility, at least in part, via FOXO1 up-regulation. FOXO1 RNAi silen- cing resulted in partial reversal of the motility suppression, suggesting that FOXO1 may indeed play a role in DKK3- promoted redifferentiation of ACC cells. Based on the in- verse relationship observed in ACC tissue between DKK3
and beta-catenin expression, it can be assumed that DKK3/ FOXO1 regulation of malignant behavior of SW-13 cells is mediated through beta-catenin signaling. However, the pre- cise DKK3-FOXO1 signaling circuitry in the context of ad- renocortical differentiation needs to be investigated further.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time that DKK3 expression is frequently reduced in ACC, poten- tially contributing to adrenal dedifferentiation and/or pro- gression of malignancy. Further, we identified FOXO1 as a downstream effector of DKK3 that may play a role in blocking adrenocortical dedifferentiation. These results suggest a potential for developing novel redifferentiation- focused pharmaceuticals that could allow successful treatment of ACCs when used in concert with existing treatment regimens.
Additional file
Additional file 1: Figure S1-S10. Supplementary Figures S1-S10. (PPTX 34931 kb)
Abbreviations
ACC: Adrenocortical carcinoma; DKK3: Dickkopf-related protein 3; FBS: Fetal bovine serum; FF: Flash-frozen; FFPE: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded; FITC: Fluorescein isothiocyanate; FOXO1: Forkhead Box Protein O1; H&E: Hematoxylin & eosin; RPLP0: Ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0; RPPH1: Ribonuclease P RNA component H1; TR: Texas Red
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Drs. Irene Esposito and Henry Mayringer of Department of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany for their contributions.
Funding
This work was supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (T.C.), the Ohse Research Foundation (T.C.B.), and a Medical Student Research Fellowship from the NIH - NHLBI (J.C.). None of the funding bodies played a role in data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1: Figure S1-S10.
Authors’ contributions
JYC and TCB participated in all aspects of studies and contributed equally to the manuscript. TCB conducted DKK3 expression, promoter methylation, CNV assays, Yale cohort clinical correlations, and statistical analyses, and drafted pertinent manuscript sections. JYC performed cell culture, transfections, cell growth, migration and invasion assays, Western blots, FACS analyses, drafted the rest of the manuscript, and was responsible for revisions. TDM and AS carried out transcription array analysis and FOXO1 siRNA studies. JMH conducted WNT array analysis. AS, CCJ, and CL were responsible for KI patient recruitment, disease characterization, and collection of nucleic acids, while WTK, AK, and UIS were responsible for patient recruitment, disease characterization, and collection of nucleic acids in the Dusseldorf cohort. MLP performed histopathological analysis. RK performed light and fluorescence microscopy. TC conceived the research design, secured funding for the study, and participated in experimental design and data analysis. All authors read, participated in the critical revision of, and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from patients prior to surgical resection of adrenal tissue according to protocols approved by Institutional Review Boards at (a) Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, HIC#0812004538 (b) Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, and (c) Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Author details
1Department of Surgery & Yale Endocrine Neoplasia Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 2Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 3Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, CCK, Stockholm, Sweden. 4Department of Surgery, Medical School, Heinrich Heine University, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 5Department of Nephrology, Medical School, Heinrich Heine University, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 6Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, FMB130A, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Received: 7 April 2016 Accepted: 22 February 2017 Published online: 01 March 2017
References
1. Lebastchi AH, Kunstman JW, Carling T. Adrenocortical carcinoma: current therapeutic state-of-the-art. J Oncol. 2012;2012:234726.
2. Dackiw AP, Lee JE, Gagel RF, Evans DB. Adrenal cortical carcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25:914-26.
3. Ng L, Libertino JM. Adrenocortical carcinoma: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. J Urol. 2003;169:5-11.
4. Berthon A, Martinez A, Bertherat J, Val P. Wnt/beta-catenin signalling in adrenal physiology and tumour development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012; 351:87-95.
5. Lehmann T, Wrzesinski T. The molecular basis of adrenocortical cancer. Cancer Genet. 2012;205:131-7.
6. Simon DP, Hammer GD. Adrenocortical stem and progenitor cells: implications for adrenocortical carcinoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;351:2-11.
7. Fonseca AL, et al. Gene expression and regulation in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Biology (Basel). 2012;2(1):26-39.
8. Assie G, Letouze E, Fassnacht M, Jouinot A, Luscap W, Barreau O, Omeiri H, Rodriguez S, Perlemoine K, Rene-Corail F, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46:607-12.
9. Fonseca AL, Healy J, Kunstman JW, Korah R, Carling T. Gene expression and regulation in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Biology (Basel). 2012;2:26-39.
10. El Wakil A, Lalli E. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in adrenocortical development and cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;332:32-7.
11. Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/ß-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149: 1192-205.
12. Brisken C, Heineman A, Chavarria T, Elenbaas B, Tan J, Dey SK, McMahon JA, McMahon AP, Weinberg RA. Essential function of Wnt-4 in mammary gland development downstream of progesterone signaling. Genes Dev. 2000;14: 650-4.
13. Jordan BK, Shen JH, Olaso R, Ingraham HA, Vilain E. Wnt4 overexpression disrupts normal testicular vasculature and inhibits testosterone synthesis by repressing steroidogenic factor 1/beta-catenin synergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:10866-71.
14. Suwa T, Chen M, Hawks CL, Hornsby PJ. Zonal expression of dickkopf-3 and components of the Wnt signalling pathways in the human adrenal cortex. J Endocrinol. 2003;178:149-58.
15. Schimmer BP, White PC. Minireview: steroidogenic factor 1: its roles in differentiation, development, and disease. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:1322-37.
16. Heikkila M, Peltoketo H, Leppaluoto J, Ilves M, Vuolteenaho O, Vainio S. Wnt- 4 deficiency alters mouse adrenal cortex function, reducing aldosterone production. Endocrinology. 2002;143:4358-65.
17. Niehrs C. Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators. Oncogene. 2006;25:7469-81.
18. Bernichtein S, Petretto E, Jamieson S, Goel A, Aitman TJ, Mangion JM, Huhtaniemi IT. Adrenal gland tumorigenesis after gonadectomy in mice is a complex genetic trait driven by epistatic loci. Endocrinology. 2008;149:651-61.
19. Howe LR, Subbaramaiah K, Chung WJ, Dannenberg AJ, Brown AM. Transcriptional activation of cyclooxygenase-2 in Wnt-1-transformed mouse mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1572-7.
20. Valencia A, Roman-Gomez J, Cervera J, Such E, Barragan E, Bolufer P, Moscardo F, Sanz GF, Sanz MA. Wnt signaling pathway is epigenetically regulated by methylation of Wnt antagonists in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23:1658-66.
21. Gaujoux S, Pinson S, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Amar L, Ragazzon B, Launay P, Meatchi T, Libe R, Bertagna X, Audebourg A, et al. Inactivation of the APC gene is constant in adrenocortical tumors from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis but not frequent in sporadic adrenocortical cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5133-41.
22. Mitsui Y, Yasumoto H, Nagami T, Hiraki M, Arichi N, Ishikawa N, Araki A, Maruyama R, Tanaka Y, Dahiya R, Shiina H. Extracellular activation of Wnt signaling through epigenetic dysregulation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (Wif-1) is associated with pathogenesis of adrenocortical tumor. Oncotarget. 2014;5:2198-207.
23. Bertherat J, Groussin L, Sandrini F, Matyakhina L, Bei T, Stergiopoulos S, Papageorgiou T, Bourdeau I, Kirschner LS, Vincent-Dejean C, et al. Molecular and functional analysis of PRKAR1A and its locus (17q22-24) in sporadic adrenocortical tumors: 17q losses, somatic mutations, and protein kinase A expression and activity. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5308-19.
24. Juhlin CC, Goh G, Healy JM, Fonseca AL, Scholl UI, Stenman A, Kunstman JW, Brown TC, Overton JD, Mane SM, et al. Whole-exome sequencing characterizes the landscape of somatic mutations and copy number alterations in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E493-502.
25. El Wakil A, Bandulik S, Guy N, Bendahhou S, Zennaro MC, Niehrs C, Mari B, Warth R, Barhanin J, Lalli E. Dkk3 is a component of the genetic circuitry regulating aldosterone biosynthesis in the adrenal cortex. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:4922-9.
26. Veeck J, Dahl E. Targeting the Wnt pathway in cancer: the emerging role of Dickkopf-3. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1825;2012:18-28.
27. Lee EJ, Jo M, Rho SB, Park K, Yoo YN, Park J, Chae M, Zhang W, Lee JH. Dkk3, downregulated in cervical cancer, functions as a negative regulator of beta-catenin. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:287-97.
28. Hoang BH, Kubo T, Healey JH, Yang R, Nathan SS, Kolb EA, Mazza B, Meyers PA, Gorlick R. Dickkopf 3 inhibits invasion and motility of Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells by modulating the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2734-9.
29. Saeb-Parsy K, Veerakumarasivam A, Wallard MJ, Thorne N, Kawano Y, Murphy G, Neal DE, Mills IG, Kelly JD. MT1-MMP regulates urothelial cell invasion via transcriptional regulation of Dickkopf-3. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:663-9.
30. Brown TC, Juhlin CC, Healy JM, Stenman A, Rubinstein JC, Korah R, Carling T. DNA copy amplification and overexpression of SLC12A7 in adrenocortical carcinoma. Surgery. 2016;159:250-8.
31. Korah R, Healy JM, Kunstman JW, Fonseca AL, Ameri AH, Prasad ML, Carling T. Epigenetic silencing of RASSF1A deregulates cytoskeleton and promotes malignant behavior of adrenocortical carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:87.
32. Yin DT, Wu W, Li M, Wang QE, Li H, Wang Y, Tang Y, Xing M. DKK3 is a potential tumor suppressor gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:507-14.
33. Hsieh SY, Hsieh PS, Chiu CT, Chen WY. Dickkopf-3/REIC functions as a suppressor gene of tumor growth. Oncogene. 2004;23:9183-9.
34. Kobayashi K, Ouchida M, Tsuji T, Hanafusa H, Miyazaki M, Namba M, Shimizu N, Shimizu K. Reduced expression of the REIC/Dkk-3 gene by promoter- hypermethylation in human tumor cells. Gene. 2002;282:151-8.
35. Yu J, Tao Q, Cheng YY, Lee KY, Ng SS, Cheung KF, Tian L, Rha SY, Neumann U, Rocken C, et al. Promoter methylation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling antagonist Dkk-3 is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:49-60.
36. Veeck J, Bektas N, Hartmann A, Kristiansen G, Heindrichs U, Knuchel R, Dahl E. Wnt signalling in human breast cancer: expression of the putative Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-3 (DKK3) is frequently suppressed by promoter hypermethylation in mammary tumours. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R82.
37. Yang B, Du Z, Gao YT, Lou C, Zhang SG, Bai T, Wang YJ, Song WQ. Methylation of Dickkopf-3 as a prognostic factor in cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:755-63.
38. Lodygin D, Epanchintsev A, Menssen A, Diebold J, Hermeking H. Functional epigenomics identifies genes frequently silenced in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4218-27.
39. Chim CS, Pang R, Fung TK, Choi CL, Liang R. Epigenetic dysregulation of Wnt signaling pathway in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2007;21:2527-36.
40. . Fonseca AL, Kugelberg J, Starker LF, Scholl U, Choi M, Hellman P, Akerstrom G, Westin G, Lifton RP, Bjorklund P, Carling T. Comprehensive DNA methylation analysis of benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012;51:949-60.
41. Durand J, Lampron A, Mazzuco TL, Chapman A, Bourdeau I. Characterization of differential gene expression in adrenocortical tumors harboring beta- catenin (CTNNB1) mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E1206-11.
42. Papatriantafyllou M, Moldenhauer G, Ludwig J, Tafuri A, Garbi N, Hollmann G, Kublbeck G, Klevenz A, Schmitt S, Pougialis G, et al. Dickkopf-3, an immune modulator in peripheral CD8 T-cell tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:1631-6.
43. Liang L, He H, Lv R, Zhang M, Huang H, An Z, Li S. Preliminary mechanism on the methylation modification of Dkk-1 and Dkk-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:1245-50.
44. Petrie RJ, Yamada KM. At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:5917-26.
45. Krause M, Gautreau A. Steering cell migration: lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:577-90.
46. Petrie RJ, Gavara N, Chadwick RS, Yamada KM. Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2012;197:439-55.
47. Vivar R, Humeres C, Munoz C, Boza P, Bolivar S, Tapia F, Lavandero S, Chiong M, Diaz-Araya G. FoxO1 mediates TGF-beta1-dependent cardiac myofibroblast differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1863;2016:128-38.
48. Guan H, Tan P, Xie L, Mi B, Fang Z, Li J, Yue J, Liao H, Li F. FOXO1 inhibits osteosarcoma oncogenesis via Wnt/beta-catenin pathway suppression. Oncogenesis. 2015;4:e166.
49. . Qin W, Pan J, Qin Y, Lee DN, Bauman WA, Cardozo C. Identification of functional glucocorticoid response elements in the mouse FoxO1 promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450:979-83.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and we will help you at every step:
· We accept pre-submission inquiries
. Our selector tool helps you to find the most relevant journal
. We provide round the clock customer support
· Convenient online submission
· Thorough peer review
. Inclusion in PubMed and all major indexing services
· Maximum visibility for your research
Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit
BioMed Central