Metastatic Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma Presenting as an Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Case Report with Review of Literature

International Journal of Surgical Pathology 2025, Vol. 33(5) 1128-1134 @ The Author(s) 2025 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/10668969241308234 journals.sagepub.com/home/ijs

S Sage

Sonali Dixit, MD, DNB, Pathology1, Nayantrishna Nath, MD Pathology1 (D, Shipra Agarwal, MD Pathology, MNAMS1 (D , Sameer Rastogi, MD, DM Medical Oncology”, Shamim Ahmed Shamim, MD, Nuclear Medicine3, Rishi Nayyar, MS, MCh, Urology4, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, MD, Radiology5, and Mehar Chand Sharma, MD, Pathology1

Abstract

Background. Metastasis of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) to the adrenal gland is infrequent, with only eight patients reported in the literature. Here we present an ASPS in an adolescent girl presented as a hypervascular adrenal incidentaloma along with a review of the available literature. This study aims to serve as a reference to aid in the pre- operative radiological and histopathological diagnosis of this rare entity. Case presentation. A 17-year-old adolescent girl presented to the Department of Urology after the detection of a hypervascular left adrenal incidentaloma on follow-up PET-CT, five months post-surgery for frontal bone ASPS. The radiological differential diagnoses were adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and metastatic ASPS. The post-operative adrenalectomy specimen, on gross exami- nation, revealed a solid, variegated tumor replacing the entire normal adrenal parenchyma. Haematoxylin and eosin- stained sections showed a tumor with cells dispersed in nests separated by large fibrovascular septae. The tumor cells were large, polygonal with abundant clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli. Occasional mitotic figures, foci of necrosis, dystrophic calcification, and sinusoidal and vascular invasion were noted. Histopathological dif- ferential diagnoses were metastatic ASPS, a primary adrenocortical carcinoma, and local infiltration/metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Ancillary studies including immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and ultrastructural examination helped to confirm the diagnosis of alveolar soft part sarcoma metastatic to the adrenal gland. Conclusion. ASPS presenting as a hypervascular incidentaloma is rare and is likely to be misdiagnosed, especially as adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and renal cell carcinoma. The differential diagnosis is further com- plicated by an overlap of pathological features among these entities. A relevant clinical history and ancillary tests are mandatory to diagnose these tumors. Early detection can help timely therapeutic intervention that can improve patient outcome.

Keywords

alveolar soft part sarcoma, adrenal, metastatic, incidentaloma, hypervascular

Introduction

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare malignancy of young adults, accounting for < 1% of soft tissue sarcomas. It is commonly associated with lung, bone, and brain metastases.” There are only eight published examples of ASPS metastatic to the adrenal gland.2-9 Here we discuss an ASPS in an adolescent girl presenting as a hypervascular adrenal incidentaloma, along with a discussion of the possible pitfalls in diagnosis during pre- operative radiological evaluation and histopathological examination.

1Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

2Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

3Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

4Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

5Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Corresponding Author:

Shipra Agarwal, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.

Email: drshipra0902@gmail.com

Case Presentation

A 17-year-old adolescent girl was referred to the Department of Urology after detecting a hypervascular left adrenal mass on a PET-CT examination. The latter had been performed as a work-up during the follow-up post- surgery for ASPS involving the frontal bone five months prior to the current presentation (Figure 1). The pre- operative radiological differential diagnoses were adreno- cortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and metastatic ASPS. The serum hormonal profile was normal, ruling out a functional tumor. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core biopsy of the mass were inadequate and yielded only fibro-collagenous tissue, following which a left diagnostic and therapeutic adrenalectomy was done. On gross examination, the specimen measured 4.5× 4.1 x 1.2 cm and weighed 39 gm. The cut surface revealed a solid, variegated tumor almost entirely replacing the adrenal gland but without any capsular breach (Figure 2).

Histopathological examination revealed a tumor with cells dispersed in nests separated by large fibrovascular septae. The tumor cells were large, polygonal with abun- dant clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucle- oli (Figure 2). Occasional mitosis, foci of necrosis, dystrophic calcification, and sinusoidal and vascular

invasion were noted. There was microscopic infiltration of tumor into peri-adrenal fat. A histopathological differen- tial diagnosis of ASPS, adrenocortical carcinoma, pheo- chromocytoma, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) and local infiltration/metastases from renal cell carcinoma was considered. On immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were negative for keratin (Bio SB, clone: AE1/AE3), melanA (Dako, clone: A 103), SF1 (Zeta corp., clone: N1665), calretinin (Bio SB, clone: EP1798), inhibin (Biocare, clone: 13CR1), synaptophysin (Bio SB, clone: EP158), and chromogranin (Thermo, clone: LK2H10), arguing against adrenocortical carcinoma, pheo- chromocytoma, and PEComa. The cells were also negative for CD10 (Biocare, clone: 56c6), and PAX8 (Cell marque, clone: 3F9), arguing against a clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

There was, however, diffuse immunopositivity for Cathepsin K (Cell marque, clone:3F9) and TFE3 (GenomeMe, clone: IHC 672), and negative reaction for vimentin (Bio SB, clone: V9), confirming the possibility of a metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma. Ki67 prolifera- tion index was 6%-7%. Periodic Acid-Schiff with diastase stain revealed intracytoplasmic crystals and coarse gran- ules, that were confirmed to be rhomboid-shaped crystals on ultrastructural examination (Figure 2).

Figure 1. A & B: Pre & post-surgery FDG PET/CT maximum intensity projection images (MIP). Presurgical MIP image (A) showing focal abnormal FDG uptake in left suprarenal location (white arrow). Post-surgical MIP image (B) shows abnormal focal FDG uptake in left suprarenal (white arrow) region, in left lung & in liver (black arrow). C-F: Presurgical CT (C) shows heterogeneous adrenal lesion (white arrow). (D) fused pre-surgery FDG PET/CT showing mildly FDG-avid heterogeneously enhancing left suprarenal lesion (thick white arrow). (E) Showing ill-defined thickening with surgical clips at adrenal bed region, on fused PET-CT images (F) revealed FDG- avid heterogeneously enhancing lesion at adrenal bed region (thick solid arrow). G-J: Pre-surgery CT (G) and fused PET/CT (H) images in lung window with no lung lesion. Post-surgical CT (I) and fused post-surgical FDG PET-CT (J) show soft tissue density nodule in left lung nodule. K-M: T2 weighted MRI image in the sagittal plane (K), post-contrast T1 weighted images in coronal (L) and sagittal (M) planes showing a mass lesion arising from the skull vault in the midline (thin arrow) which is mildly T2 hyperintense and showing post-contrast enhancement. Associated enhancing dural tail (thick solid arrow) and changes (white arrowhead) secondary to frontal bone surgery are seen.

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

K

L

M

1

1

FISH assay performed using TFE3 break-apart probe (CT-PAC013-10-OG, LSP TFE3 5 CytoOrange / LSP TFE3 3 CytoGreen probe) confirmed TFE3 gene rearrangement involving 15% of the cells (Figure 2), against the suggested cut-off of %> 7.15% positive nuclei with any pattern of break-apart signals.10

Hence a final diagnosis of alveolar soft part sarcoma met- astatic to the left adrenal gland was made. The patient was referred to medical oncology, where a follow-up PET-CT scan revealed metastases to the lung, liver, and skull. An FDG-avid soft tissue density lesion was also noted in the left suprarenal region, suggestive of residual disease. MRI brain showed the metastatic diseases involving the skull vault (Figure 1).

In view of the widely metastatic and non-treatable disease, the patient’s relatives were appraised about the poor prognosis.

Literature Search Strategy

A systematic search of the literature was conducted on PubMed, PubMed Central, and Ovid Medline, with the fol- lowing restrictions: date (1 January 1957 to 31 March 2024), studies (humans), and language (no limitations). Search terms included “Alveolar soft part sarcoma meta- static to adrenal”, “metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma”, and “Alveolar soft part sarcoma AND adrenal”.

Literature Review and Analysis

Only eight examples of ASPS with adrenal metastasis have been reported in the international literature.2-9 Of these, merely three presented as an adrenal mass, with the rest being documented at autopsy. Table 1 enlists the details of all these eight tumors and the present patient.

Figure 2. (A) Cut surface of the adrenal gland shows a solid tumor with variegated appearance almost replacing the normal adrenal parenchyma. (B) H & E section shows a tumor, with cells dispersed in nests and alveolar pattern separated by thin fibrovascular septae. There are foci of necrosis. (C) The tumor cells are large, polygonal with abundant clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli. (D) Tumor cells are immunopositive for TFE3 (TFE3, 400X), TFE3 break-apart FISH shows TFE3 gene rearrangement. One yellow signal (fused) with red and green break-apart signals (Inset). (E) Tumor cells are immunopositive for Cathepsin K (CathepsinK, 200X). (F) Electron micrograph reveals intracytoplasmic rhomboid-shaped crystals.

A

B

HE,40X

TFE3, FISH

C

HE,400X

D

TFE3,400X

E

CathepsinK,400X

F

EM

Table 1. Details of published examples of alveolar soft part sarcoma metastatic to the adrenal gland.
SNAuthors (Year)Age (years)/ SexPrimary site of the tumorSites of metastasis other than the adrenalDetection of adrenal involvementAncillary testing on adrenal tumorTherapy givenFollow-up after detection of adrenal disease
1Macfarlane et al® (1957)6 / ManLeft thighLeft cerebral hemisphere, spinal cord, inguinal LN Autopsy - Liver, lung, vertebral column, skull, palateAt autopsyNoneExcision of left thigh massNA
2Karnauchow Magne et al (1963)23 / WomanLeft forearmBrain, heart, lungs, paratracheal lymph node, left kidney, left adrenal and left ovaryAt autopsyNoneExcision of the primary tumor (left forearm) massNA
3Liberman et al (1966)26 / ManLeft brachioradialisLiver, brain, and skin on autopsyAt autopsyNoneRadical muscle resection of primary tumor (left brachioradialis)NA
4Ho et al8 (1979)96 / WomanRight upper neckBrain, liver, lung, cardiac, spleenAt autopsyNonePartial resection of the primary tumor (right side of upper neck) followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapyNA
5Pak et al7 (1987)23 / ManThighCerebral hemisphere, ocular, lungs, brain, kidneys, liver, spleen, pancreas, small intestine and left upper extremityAt autopsyNonecisplatin and doxorubicin hydrochloride for primary tumorNA
6Selvarajah S et al3 (2014)41 / WomanNANot mentionedDuring follow-upEM and FISHNot availableNA
7Niu L et al2 (2016)36 / ManRight lower extremityLung, kidney, cardiacDuring follow-upNone. Histopathological findings- not availableResection of primary tumor (right lower extremity), Systemic chemotherapy Cyberknife treatment for adrenal and cardiac metastasisFOD; 3 months

(continued)

Table 1. (continued)
disease of adrenal Follow-up after detectionmonths No follow-up AWD; 14
givenpalliative and
Therapyprimary masses
to of
Referred Excision chemotherapy adrenal
tumor testing onCathepsin- K crystals rearrangement gene 3 Positive for Intracytoplasmic
adrenalTFE TFE Positive
AncillaryTFE3, rhomboidal FISH: IHC: IHC: EM:
involvement of adrenalsystemic on adrenal with follow-up
Detectionnon-specific incidentaloma hypervascular Presented During radiology symptoms;
adrenal otherliver
lung,
the metastasis
than ofvault,
SitesSkull None
of
site tumorregion bone
Primary theGluteal Frontal mass
Sex Age (years)/Woman 17 / 23 / Man
(Year)(2018) M patient
Authorsal Goroshi Current
et
SN9 8

ASPS- alveolar soft part sarcoma, DOD- died of disease, FOD- free of disease, AWD- alive with disease, IHC- immunohistochemistry, FISH- fluorescent in situ hybridization, EM- electron microscopy, NA- not applicable.

Discussion

ASPS is a rare sarcoma of uncertain histogenesis, espe- cially prevalent in female patients aged 15-35 years.3, It is characterized by the nonreciprocal chromosomal trans- location t(X;17) (p11.2; q25), resulting in ASPL :: TFE3 fusion.12 The most common primary sites of involvement are deep soft tissues of the thigh, buttock, and trunk (11). Distant metastases are common, particularly to the lung, bone, and brain (1). We present here a rare example of an adolescent girl who presented to the urology department with a hypervascular adrenal incidentaloma, diagnosed 5 months post-surgery for ASPS of the frontal bone. Only one other example of ASPS presenting as a hypervascular adrenal mass has been reported in the literature (4). Adrenal tumors that commonly show a heterogeneous bright enhancement on PET-CT are adrenocortical carci- noma, pheochromocytoma, metastases from renal cell car- cinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (4). ASPS is histopathologically characterized by the presence of large polygonal cells with abundant granular eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm arranged in a nested or pseudoalveolar growth pattern (12). Notably, all the tumors considered in the differential diagnosis of hypervascular adrenal mass show a similar morphological appearance, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis on small specimens. In the current patient, FNAC and core biopsy were attempted but were unsatisfactory for evaluation, and an accurate diagnosis could be made only on resection. Extensive ancillary testing was employed for confirmation. This included immunohistochemistry to rule out other differential diag- noses with clear cell morphology including clear cell renal cell carcinoma and adrenocortical carcinoma, molec- ular analysis demonstrating fusion involving the TFE3 gene, and ultrastructural evaluation documenting the diag- nostic intracytoplasmic rhomboid crystals.

Of the eight published ASPS metastatic to the adrenal gland, only one was subjected to ultrastructural examina- tion and FISH analysis (3). The prevalence of adrenal involvement is low. Selvarajah et al reported adrenal metastasis in one of their 17 (6%) ASPS patients (3). In another study, adrenal metastasis was noted in only one of the 53 (2%) patients with ASPS (5). A comprehensive evaluation of all such tumors including the current patient revealed that the age of presentation is wide, varying from six years to 96 years (Table 1; mean age, 32.33 ± 25.9 years; median age, 23 years). Thus, excluding our patient, to date only eight reported examples of ASPS metastatic to the adrenal exist in the literature (Table 1). The primary site has been variable and includes lower extremity (27,9), upper extremity in (5,6), upper neck (8), gluteal region (4), and frontal bone (current patient). In five of these patients, adrenal metastases were detected on autopsy. There was associated multi-organ involvement in all these patients (5-9). In the current patient and two

Table 2. IHC panel for the differential diagnoses of hypervascular adrenal tumors.
TFE3+ ± +
CathepsinK
+ + +
Arginase/HepPar1/Glypican+− − −
CD10+++
CA9±+
PAX8+− − −
GATA3+− − −
Chromogranin Synaptophysin+− − −
+±+− − −
Calre-tinin+±− − ±
MelanA+− − +
Inhibin+±
SF1+
KeratinK7: ± K20: -K7: ± K20: ±− − −
14,15,16cell18 carcinoma
Diagnosis13 carcinoma AdrenocorticalPheochromo-cytomaClear cell Renal 17 carcinomaHepatocellularIndex patient ASPS 19,20 PEComa

others with available details, adrenal disease was detected during follow-up radiology (2,4). Such patients have been variably managed with surgical excision (2) and palliative chemotherapy (4). A short follow-up of 3 months was available only in one published report, at the end of which the patient was free of disease (2). Our current patient is alive with widely metastatic disease, 14 months following the detection of adrenal disease.

Conclusions

Alveolar soft part sarcoma presenting as an adrenal inci- dentaloma is a typical example of ‘an uncommon disease having a common presentation. A wide age range with overlapping clinical, radiological, and histomorphological findings complicates and delays accurate diagnosis and patient management. A high index of suspicion is, hence, essential, keeping in mind that adrenal involvement usually indicates a widely metastatic disease.

Histopathological evaluation supplemented with immu- nohistochemistry (Table 2), ultrastructural, and molecular analysis is imperative for differentiating ASPS from other commoner primary and metastatic neoplasms involv- ing the adrenal gland.

The best treatment option for this entity is still unknown. Hence, we encourage clinicians to report their experience with adrenal ASPS to understand this entity better and plan appropriate management.

Abbreviations

ASPSAlveolar soft part sarcoma
FISHFluorescent in situ hybridization
PEComaPerivascular epithelioid cell tumor

Authors’ Contributions

SD, NN, and SA wrote the main manuscript text and prepared Figures and Table. SA, MCS did the critical review and editing of the manuscript and analysis of electron microscopy. SR, SAS, RN, and DK provided clinical and radiological inputs during manuscript preparation.

Consent for publication was given as per institutional policy.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate Informed consent was given as per institutional policy.

Ethical Approval

No data that can potentially and clearly identify the patient was included in the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, author- ship, and/or publication of this article.

Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.

Trial Registration

Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.

ORCID iDs

Nayantrishna Nath İD https:/orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-6709 Shipra Agarwal ID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7037-4444

References

1. Randazzo MJ, Thawani JP, Manur R, Brooks JS, Ozturk AK. Metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma of the spinal cord: a case report and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:953.e1-953.e5.

2. Niu L, Luo X, Zeng J, et al. Cryoablation combined with iodine-125 implantation in the treatment of cardiac metasta- sis from alveolar soft part sarcoma: a case report. Biomed Hub. 2016;1(3):1-8.

3. Selvarajah S, Pyne S, Chen E, et al. High-resolution array CGH and gene expression profiling of alveolar soft part sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(6):1521-1530.

4. Goroshi M, Lila AR, Bandgar T, Shah NS. Alveolar soft part sarcoma presenting as hypervascular adrenal metastasis. World J Nucl Med. 2018;17(1):62-64.

5. Lieberman PH, Foote FW Jr, Stewart FW, Berg JW. Alveolar soft-part sarcoma. JAMA. 1966;198(10):1047-1051.

6. Karnauchow PM, Magner D. The histogenesis of alveolar soft part sarcoma. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1963;86(1):169-177.

7. Pak W, Glasgow BJ, Brown HH, Foos RY. Intraocular metastasis of alveolar soft-part sarcoma. Case report. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(7):894-895.

8. Ho KL. Sarcoma metastatic to the central nervous system: report of three cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1979;5(1):44-48.

9. Macfarlane A, Macgregor AR. Malignant non-chromaffin paraganglioma of the thigh. Arch Dis Child. 1958;33(167):55-57.

10. Pradhan D, Roy S, Quiroga-Garza G, et al. Validation and utilization of a TFE3 break-apart FISH assay for Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma. Diagn Pathol. 2015;10:179.

11. Fletcher CDM, Jambhekar N, Ladanyi. Alveolar soft part sarcoma. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumors. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. (WHO classification of tumors series, 5th ed .; vol. 3).

12. Kumar A, Alrohmain B, Taylor W, Bhattathiri P. Alveolar soft part sarcoma: the new primary intracranial malignancy: a case report and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(1):23-29.

13. Wang R, Solomon B, Luen SJ, et al. Pitfalls and progress in adrenocortical carcinoma diagnosis: the utility of a multidisciplinary approach, immunohistochemistry and genomics. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2022;1(1):21-81.

14. Mete O, Pakbaz S, Lerario AM, Giordano TJ, Asa SL. Significance of alpha-inhibin expression in pheochromocyto- mas and paragangliomas. Am J Surg Pathol. ☒ 2021;45(9):1264-1273.

15. Jorda M, De MB, Nadji M. Calretinin and inhibin are useful in separating adrenocortical neoplasms from pheochromocy- tomas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2002;10(1):67-70.

16. Perrino CM, Ho A, Dall CP, Zynger DL. Utility of GATA3 in the differential diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Histopathology. 2017;71(3):475-479.

17. Courcier J, de la Taille A, Nourieh M, Leguerney I, Lassau N, Ingels A. Carbonic anhydrase IX in renal cell carcinoma, implications for disease management. Int J Mol Sci. ☒ 2020;21(19):7146.

18. Lau SK, Prakash S, Geller SA, Alsabeh R. Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2002;33(12):1175-1181.

19. Hamberlain BK, McClain CM, Gonzalez RS, Coffin CM, Cates JM. Alveolar soft part sarcoma and granular cell tumor: an immunohistochemical comparison study. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(5):1039-1044.

20. Martignoni G, Gobbo S, Camparo P, et al. Differential expression of cathepsin K in neoplasms harboring TFE3 gene fusions. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(10):1313-1319.